The House of Blue

Really?.....really......Are you serious? "MY GOD MAN"
With a comment like that, you obviously either dont remember that roster or just didnt watch that team.

We had Locke at RB. Ran for 1000 yards. Dont forget Moncell Allen who had a solid year too.
Hartline finished 3rd or better in nearly every passing stat in the conf. Had we won more games (which ill talk about shortly) he had a legit shot at SEC offensive player of the year. You can argue the only QB better that yeat was Mallet...SEC wise.
At WR we had Cobb, King, and Matthews. Matthews btw lead the SEC in TD receptions and had a better year stat wise than Alshon Jeffries.
Our O line (Burden, Hines, Smith, Warford, and Durham) was fantatic leading the SEC in fewest sacks allowed.

On D, we had players. Ukwu and Evans on the ends, and yeah, Dequin Evans had a disappointing year but really turned in on late. Winston Guy, Randell Burden, Danny T, Sneed, Neloms, Avery Williamson played as a frosh....we had talent all over that team...both sides of the ball.

Harline plays against Pitt and we easilly win that game. Period. Thats 7 wins. And as Hop posted, Ole Miss, Miss St., and UT were all games we could have easily won.

That team should have won 9-10 games....

I think "MY GOD MAN" was completely and entirely waaay off base.

Thats fair considering that had we won any of the reg season games (Miss St., Ole Miss, or UT) that we should have or could have then we wouldnt have played a terrible Pitt (a game we wouldve won with Mikey) team as we would have played in a different bowl game. My main point was imo we were better than 6 wins. As well as the fact we were much better than the poster was insinuating.