In partnership with CBSSports.com
Online Now 1976
Online now 126 Record: 6210 (3/13/2012)
You have no favorite boards.
The most viewed topics.
The most replied to topics.
The most up-voted topics.
The most down-voted topics.
The most up-voted posters.
The most down-voted posters.
The most followed posters.
100 - 50 UK
Here is a page 2 link to the Prediction Summary Table for this game so you can view it without returning to the OP to find the link.
Still about 1 hour to get in your last minute prediction
Here we go.
Any last minute predictions, prior to tip off, will be added to the table.
You can find the results at the following link. During the second half, the standings shown will be based on projected final scores. The final results will appear after the end of the game.
UK scored its 43 points in a total of 37 possessions for the half, and LIPSCOMB scored its 29 points on a total of 37 possessions. Kentucky and Lipscomb each grabbed 19 rebounds in the first half, but Kentucky controlled the offensive glass,9-7 Kentucky converted its offensive rounding advantage into a 12-4 advantage in second chance points. LIPSCOMB had an offensive efficiency of 0.676 ppp on its 37 first chance possessions and 0.571 ppp for its 7 second chance possession. UK had 0.838 ppp on its 37 first chance possessions and 1.333 ppp on its 9 second chance possessions. With respect to the offensive rebounding, UK grabbed a low 42.9% of its misses as offensive rebounds while LIPSCOMB was able to convert 41.2% of its misses into bonus possessions with offensive rebounds.
UK hit poorly from the free throw line in this half, after making 8-12 (66.7%). LIPSCOMB finished 2-5 [40.0%] for the half. Field goal shooting for UK was 16-37 overall [43.2%] and 3-10 from long range [30.0%]. For LIPSCOMB, their field goal shooting from inside the arc was a strong 9-19 [47.4%] and from long range, LIPSCOMB hit 3-7 [42.9%].
The Cats committed 5 turnovers, one for every 7.4 possessions. The Cats forced 15 LIPSCOMB turnovers, one for every 2.5 possessions.
UK scored its 88 points in 73possessions [1.21 ppp] for the game, and LIPSCOMB scored its 50 points on 72 possessions [0.69 ppp].
Kentucky won the boards, with a rebounding edge 42-32, and Kentucky won the offensive glass with a 18-12 offensive rebounding advantage. LIPSCOMB converted its 12 second chance possessions into 7 second chance points while Kentucky converted their 18 second chance possessions to score 20 second chance points. LIPSCOMB had an offensive efficiency of 0.597 ppp on its 72 first chance possessions and 0.583 ppp for its 12 second chance possessions. UK had 0.932 ppp on its 73 first chance possessions and 1.111 ppp on its 18 second chance possessions. With respect to the offensive rebounding, UK grabbed 47.4% of its misses as offensive rebounds while LIPSCOMB was able to convert 33.3% of its misses into bonus possessions with offensive rebounds.
UK hit poorly from the free throw line in this game, making 16-26 [61.5%]. LIPSCOMB made 13-24 [54.2%] for the game. Field goal shooting for UK was 32-66 overall [48.5%] and 8-22 from long range [36.4%]. For LIPSCOMB, their field goal shooting from inside the arc was a weak 14-38 [36.8%] and from long range, LIPSCOMB hit 3-10 [30.0%].
The Cats who committed 14 turnovers, one for every 5.2 possessions. The Cats forced 24 LIPSCOMB turnovers, one for every 3.0 possessions.
Prior to the game, the NGE analysis predicted a 30 point UK win, 88-58 at a pace of 73 possessions for UK and 73 possessions for Lipscomb. The final score was 88 (88) to 50 (58) at a pace of 73 possessions for the Cats and 72 possessions for LIPSCOMB. The UK offensive efficiency for the game was 1.205 ppp (1.205 ppp) and the UK defensive efficiency was 0.694 ppp (0.795 ppp).
Next Game On Schedule: Saturday afternoon against Marshall at Rupp Arena
Here are the standings after 10 games.
You missed my prediction of 88-54. On the 1st page, 2nd prediction.
I am sorry, but I did miss it. It happens, and that is why I ask every player to verify that I got their prediction on the prediction summary table before the game. I can correct any error prior to a game in less than a minute, but after the game, the correction process takes between 30 and 60 minutes depending upon the number of players.
Please, all players, verify that I got your prediction entered correctly prior to all future games.
I have corrected the results for the Lipscomb game to include kdale's prediction that I did not see, and therefore did not place on the Prediction Summary Table.
To all players, please check the Table before each game to make sure I did not overlook you, or that I did not make a mistake entering your prediction. Such errors occur. I am human. However, the ability to correct a mistake prior to the game is simple. The process to correct the error after I have updated the cumulative standings is very complex.
Thanks Professor. I did not get a chance to check it last time.
247Sports In partnership with CBS Sports