-
bigbluerules ●
- 5 stars Rating: 88
250 votes total - (1524)
- 32 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
bmac said...
Obviously you missed the joke there. I'm well aware of what position Robinson plays. That ball that Gene threw was going to be picked if Robinson didn't bat it out of the defender's hands. I really do believe that was the only pass breakup yesterday. Of course to break up a pass you probably need to be within 10 yards of it or looking for it.
-
Chris Fisher
- 5 stars Rating: 94
2957 votes total - (16755)
- 32 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
MadCard05 said...
I come in peace, here's what I saw you guys did well:
First of all Maxwell Smith was pretty accurate. I think UK planned on slowing UofL's defense down by throwing a lot of screens and using draw plays to keep us from pinning our ears back. For the most part it worked, but your guys just couldn't hold onto the ball. The Card's seem to play conservatively after a while. The only concern I would have is how well Smith is actually reading the defense. He really didn't test the Card's secondary too much (as in 1v1 coverage), but there wasn't a ton of play calling over the top.
YAC, YAC, YAC. UK's WRs actually did a good job of running after the catch. The routes you all ran under-neath I think were meant to abuse zone coverage, and you did that pretty well, but Louisville is a very good tackling team, so it kept the damage to a minimum once we caught up.
You all actually ran quite well against us, and really abused the fact that we spread our defensive line out to rush off the edge. Playing Smith in the shotgun was probably a good idea, and should be continued.
Causes for concern:
Secondary - Obviously you guys need help there. No one seemed to be a play maker at that position. Now I think your defensive play calling was very conservative, just as ours was. You didn't give up anything big over the top, but we abused you guys in the mid-ranged passing game.
Turn overs - If UK holds onto the ball the game is close, and Strong can't just kneel on the ball for a quarter and a half.
Important stuff:
Honestly guys I wouldn't get too down on the Cats after that performance, I think it's obvious you all have a lot of work to do on defense, but really you have to understand how good Teddy Bridgewater really is. I've been watching football for a long time, and I've never seen a QB on either of our teams, or nearly any college team, play at the level Bridgewater has been playing since the Spring as a Sophomore. If you see a replay, watch as he scrambles around and keeps his eyes down field, the moves he makes to avoid the pressure. How do you guard against that? I'd be terrified to have to defend him, it simply isn't fair at times. If you can't get pressure on him, it's hard to make him miss. Even more, he had some chances to go deep on the run, but instead checked it down to a guy under-neath because he knew mentally that trying to force it over the top on the run, even to a guy that had a few steps, could lead to an under-thrown ball and a turn over. He just didn't make the mental mistakes you'd expect out of a young QB, and his eyes where always down field. I was really stunned at how well he played, it was kind of surreal.
Our WRs aren't slouches either, and neither was our TE. I think we had a lot of experience returning at WR, and it really helped us out against your young secondary.
You want to hear a Louisville fan drink some blue cool aid real fast?
Okay, so I think you're going to win you're next 3 games, and yes that means against Florida. Against Kent State you defensive line is going to get pressure, and help your secondary out, and you guys are going to win easily. You'll get a scare against WKU, but win. Then you're going to roll into the Florida game with a little confidence and break the streak. I don't know what happens after that, and I for one wouldn't blame you for wanting to get rid of Joker even after all of that, but I think the Cats played much better than the score-board indicated, and if you guys can hold onto the ball you can rattle some chains if you don't have to chase a QB like Teddy around all day.
I know you guys are our rivals, but it's not fun when you all are down. Good luck the rest of the way.
-
tWhit said...
If people still don't believe that Bridgewater is for real then I don't know what to tell them. I didn't buy into the preseason hype but I'm a believer now. Not only is he an accurate passer but he has some wheels if needs to use them. He's spectacular moving around in the pocket or to the outside. Also sounds like he's a great leader as evidenced by the fact that he continues to say that this is about Da Ville and not him. Sounds like he's got a great head on his shoulders as well. The NFL will love that part. I put him over every QB we will face this year outside of Wilson from Arky and he's two years younger. Definitely a special talent.
I do however find it interesting that Strong was able to pull a QB like Teddy as a first year head coach. Matter of fact before he ever coached a game and must we forget how bad UofL was the year before Bridgewater. He had no interest in Louisville. Combine that with the fact that Clint Hurtt served player up to Nevin Shapiro and actually borrowed money from him I obviously have some serious questions. It remains to be seen whether the NCAA will have the same questions but we shall see.
-
UKlaw82 said...
I don't disagree that Teddy is a very good QB, BUT if you are taking this game as a Heisman game for him, forget it. I could have throw most of his passes for catches with the pressure we put on him. Let him face a good defense, probably will be only one, S.FLA, and if he throws 90% completions I will agree with you.







Defense undermines Cats in opener