Online Now 634

The House of Blue

The home for all discussion on UK athletics

On this Board 316
Record: 3046 (4/11/2012)

Online now 565
Record: 6210 (3/13/2012)

Boards ▾

The House of Blue

The home for all discussion on UK athletics

The Paddock

The place to discuss general topics outside of Kentucky

UK Ticket Exchange

Buy, sell or swap tickets

Reply

Football Predictions after Spring game.

  • Glimmer: with Smith at helm the offense resembled our offense.

    Gloomer: without DT/WG and an established punter, one can expect many negative plays due to inexperience.

    Kooky Kats 247

  • 3-4 wins is just a silly predictino. As silly as somebody who tries to say 10

    here is the logic behind my prediction.

    A. Our offense was THE WORST since the curry era last year. Not necesarily because of coaching but because of NO qb play, o-line injuries, running back injuries and awful recruiting at receiver. Our offense will make huge strides this year.

    B. Our defense will be better, much better earlier in the season than they were early last season. Our defense was good at the end of last year. It was bad in the begining. That's because of the new scheme. Defense should be pretty good all year.

    My predictions based on this?

    Sept. 1, 2012 at Louisville W - Louisville lost about the same amount of production as us. i think we upgrade significantly on offense. They don't. We had a shot at the end last year and we were an AWFUL team at the time.
    Sept. 8, 2012 Kent State W -Obvious
    Sept. 15, 2012 Western Kentucky W - obvious
    Sept. 22, 2012 at Florida L - this is the year I think we get it back to a "competitive" game. UF isn't quite as good and we're better.
    Sept. 29, 2012 South Carolina W - I think we start a little streak with wins at our place. They are losing some VERY special players. They are good, but they aren't nearly as good and I think we're better. We get them at home too.
    Oct. 6, 2012 Miss. State w - same situation as last year. They lost one of the best players in the conference off of their d-line. WE played them close at our place. Are they better? No. Are we? yes. It will be close but I think we win.
    Oct. 13, 2012 at Arkansas L - This is one I think we have a shot at but it's at there place and they are very talented on offense.
    Oct. 20, 2012 Georgia L - This game could go to overtime but I think Murray is simply too good.
    Oct. 27, 2012 at Missouri L - This is a game that we will have a shot it. But Mizzou is a tough place to play and it will be a tough scheme to prepare for. I think we lose a close one. Maybe overtime.
    Nov. 3, 2012 Vanderbilt W - We exact revenge for last year. They were improved but they only won 2 conference games. We did the same. The difference is that we are much improved. With all they lost off of their defense I don't see them as being as good. Franklin will take a step back in year 2.
    Nov. 17, 2012 Samford W - obvious
    Nov. 24, 2012 at Tennesse W - Yes, two in a row and a win at neyland. Tennessee likely has an interim coach at this point. Da'rick rodgers might be kicked off the team by this point too...

    There you have it... that's my prediction. Nice start to the year, mid-season swoon, but three straight wins at the end of the year send us to a bowl game...

    This post was edited by hoptownukfan on 4/24/2012 at 3:09 PM

    hoptownukfan

  • hoptownukfan said...

    3-4 wins is just a silly predictino. As silly as somebody who tries to say 10

    here is the logic behind my prediction.

    A. Our offense was THE WORST since the curry era last year. Not necesarily because of coaching but because of NO qb play, o-line injuries, running back injuries and awful recruiting at receiver. Our offense will make huge strides this year.

    B. Our defense will be better, much better earlier in the season than they were early last season. Our defense was good at the end of last year. It was bad in the begining. That's because of the new scheme. Defense should be pretty good all year.

    My predictions based on this?

    Sept. 1, 2012 at Louisville W - Louisville lost about the same amount of production as us. i think we upgrade significantly on offense. They don't. We had a shot at the end last year and we were an AWFUL team at the time. Sept. 8, 2012 Kent State W -Obvious Sept. 15, 2012 Western Kentucky W - obvious Sept. 22, 2012 at Florida L - this is the year I think we get it back to a "competitive" game. UF isn't quite as good and we're better. Sept. 29, 2012 South Carolina W - I think we start a little streak with wins at our place. They are losing some VERY special players. They are good, but they aren't nearly as good and I think we're better. We get them at home too. Oct. 6, 2012 Miss. State w - same situation as last year. They lost one of the best players in the conference off of their d-line. WE played them close at our place. Are they better? No. Are we? yes. It will be close but I think we win. Oct. 13, 2012 at Arkansas L - This is one I think we have a shot at but it's at there place and they are very talented on offense. Oct. 20, 2012 Georgia L - This game could go to overtime but I think Murray is simply too good. Oct. 27, 2012 at Missouri L - This is a game that we will have a shot it. But Mizzou is a tough place to play and it will be a tough scheme to prepare for. I think we lose a close one. Maybe overtime. Nov. 3, 2012 Vanderbilt W - We exact revenge for last year. They were improved but they only won 2 conference games. We did the same. The difference is that we are much improved. With all they lost off of their defense I don't see them as being as good. Franklin will take a step back in year 2. Nov. 17, 2012 Samford W - obvious Nov. 24, 2012 at Tennesse W - Yes, two in a row and a win at neyland. Tennessee likely has an interim coach at this point. Da'rick rodgers might be kicked off the team by this point too...

    There you have it... that's my prediction. Nice start to the year, mid-season swoon, but three straight wins at the end of the year send us to a bowl game...

    It's great to say "3-4 wins is just a silly predictino"... but why is it silly?

    Yes, the offense was awful last year. Unless I missed something, that doesn't guarantee that it won't be this year. In fact, it probably will be. The receivers will still be bad, the QB is unlikely to be great, we lost three senior OL starters. The defense might allegedly be better, but remember that we lost a lot-- by my count, at least 39 of our 64 tackles for loss last year were by guys who aren't around, and at least 10 of the 20 sacks, and 13 of our 15 INTs.

    Yes, UK was 5-7 last year. And Ole Miss, by far the worst non-UK team in the SEC is off the schedule, with Arkansas coming on. That shifts the paradigm to 4-8. I think the three cupcakes stay the same (although bear in mind, last year we beat the three cupcakes by 11, 14, and 24). Can we beat UT again? It's possible, but I wouldn't gamble on it. Could we beat Louisville? We could, but we lost to them in our house last year, and they're out recruiting us pretty severely.

    Vanderbilt did more with less last year than any team I can remember. Franklin had a big recruiting year, so I doubt they're getting worse.

    South Carolina? You do remember that it was 54-3 last year? I mean, think about this... if we're 2 TD better, and they're 2 TD worse (and both of those would be wildly optimistic), we'd lose 40-17.

    Mississippi State is always a swing game, but I've seen nothing to make me think we start winning these kinds of games.

    Look, I hope you're right. I'd love an 8-4 season. But I think 4-8 is about a hundred times more likely. UK hasn't won eight games in a regular season since 1977. What makes you think this team is the exception?

    Gridiron_Joe

  • Gridiron_Joe said...

    Says who? Newton will still be awful. Smith will probably be better, but how much better? The alternative is a true freshman at QB, which is suicide in the SEC. Our OL was terrible last year, but three starters are gone, paving the way for guys who weren't good enough to beat them out in 2011. Our WR corps is about as bad as any I've ever seen-- while I do think it'll be better than next year, again, how much better?

    Defensively, I don't see this team stopping the run or the pass. We lost most of our experience at LB and DB, including Trevathan and Guy, who made about 80% of the plays that were made on defense last year. Also, our punter is gone and the replacement is either a true freshman or somebody who is terrible.

    "neither UL nor Vandy are THAT much better than us". OK, I'll bite. UL beat us in our house last year, and has since brought in a great deal more talent than we have, without losing very much. How will this team beat them in the first game of the season? As for Vandy, they did beat us 38-8 last year (outgained us 410-211 yards). Meanwhile, Vandy did go 6-7, but played Georgia, Florida, and Arkansas to the wire. We lost to Florida by 38, Georgia by 9, and would've had our teeth knocked out by Arkansas.

    Also, let's not forget that Ole Miss went off of our schedule.

    We will beat WKU, Kent State, and Samford, although I might take WKU in an upset if they hadn't been hammered pretty hard by graduation. The WKU team from the end of last year would beat UK. We are not winning at Gainesville, or Fayetteville. I don't care if John L. Sullivan gets hired to coach the Hogs. They'll kill us. I don't see us going to Missou and winning, and either UT will kill us, or the game will be the battle of exiled coaches, and no one will care. At home, I don't see Georgia, USC, or Mississippi State losing to us. I think we might play one of the three close. Vandy is the weakest of the bunch, but look at what I said above, and consider that James Franklin is bringing the best recruiting class in school's history to Nashville.

    I'll take 4-8. I think we beat the three cupcakes, and somebody else will slip up. Maybe UL (probably not), maybe UT or Vandy or Miss. St. But I think we've got a better chance at 3-9 than we do at, say, 7-5.

    Fair enough, I guess. But I'm willing to stand by my prediction, and as convinced as you are we will suck something awful I assume you are as well. Shall we make it fun? Any amount of money you want. I say UK wins more than 3. You in?

    PHCD

  • JHB4UK said...

    Overall UK will likely be slightly better, IMO. Better on offense, slighly less on defense due to the losses and inexperience at linebacker and cornerback, special teams might take a step back with questions on the punting game.

    From what little preseason analysis I've seen, think the predictions are that UL, Florida, Georgia, Miss State, and Tennessee will be better in 2012 than in 2011.

    I believe we will be a better prepared and coached team. How do those 2 play out on the field? We will be improved---somewhat. However, most everybody (UL and SEC teams with exception of TN) will be way better. If I had to make a prediction right now I see us getting thumped in the opener and struggling to win 5 again. Best case is 7 & 5; worst case 4 & 8. I so hope I am wrong. I would love to see both sides of the ball show improvement throughout the season---beginning with Louisville. Go Blue!

    catdaddy4uk

  • Gridiron_Joe said...

    Says who? Newton will still be awful. Smith will probably be better, but how much better? The alternative is a true freshman at QB, which is suicide in the SEC. Our OL was terrible last year, but three starters are gone, paving the way for guys who weren't good enough to beat them out in 2011. Our WR corps is about as bad as any I've ever seen-- while I do think it'll be better than next year, again, how much better?

    Defensively, I don't see this team stopping the run or the pass. We lost most of our experience at LB and DB, including Trevathan and Guy, who made about 80% of the plays that were made on defense last year. Also, our punter is gone and the replacement is either a true freshman or somebody who is terrible.

    "neither UL nor Vandy are THAT much better than us". OK, I'll bite. UL beat us in our house last year, and has since brought in a great deal more talent than we have, without losing very much. How will this team beat them in the first game of the season? As for Vandy, they did beat us 38-8 last year (outgained us 410-211 yards). Meanwhile, Vandy did go 6-7, but played Georgia, Florida, and Arkansas to the wire. We lost to Florida by 38, Georgia by 9, and would've had our teeth knocked out by Arkansas.

    Also, let's not forget that Ole Miss went off of our schedule.

    We will beat WKU, Kent State, and Samford, although I might take WKU in an upset if they hadn't been hammered pretty hard by graduation. The WKU team from the end of last year would beat UK. We are not winning at Gainesville, or Fayetteville. I don't care if John L. Sullivan gets hired to coach the Hogs. They'll kill us. I don't see us going to Missou and winning, and either UT will kill us, or the game will be the battle of exiled coaches, and no one will care. At home, I don't see Georgia, USC, or Mississippi State losing to us. I think we might play one of the three close. Vandy is the weakest of the bunch, but look at what I said above, and consider that James Franklin is bringing the best recruiting class in school's history to Nashville.

    I'll take 4-8. I think we beat the three cupcakes, and somebody else will slip up. Maybe UL (probably not), maybe UT or Vandy or Miss. St. But I think we've got a better chance at 3-9 than we do at, say, 7-5.

    LOL. Well I guess we might as well throw in the towel because good 'ol "Gridiron Joe" says so. Classic LOD, every positive comes with a disclaimer, and every negative is intensified. Pretty funny stuff.

    People will be better, but how much!? LOL.

    MossCat15

  • PHCD said...

    Fair enough, I guess. But I'm willing to stand by my prediction, and as convinced as you are we will suck something awful I assume you are as well. Shall we make it fun? Any amount of money you want. I say UK wins more than 3. You in?

    I didn't say UK would win three. I actually said they'll win four, but that I thought the chance of 3-9 was better than 7-5. I would bet this UK team won't win seven regular season games. Six is within the realm of possibility, but is the best of all possible world short of divine intervention. Five wouldn't shock me, but I'm calling for four.

    Gridiron_Joe

  • MossCat15 said...

    LOL. Well I guess we might as well throw in the towel because good 'ol "Gridiron Joe" says so. Classic LOD, every positive comes with a disclaimer, and every negative is intensified. Pretty funny stuff.

    People will be better, but how much!? LOL.

    Well, when you're losing by 30 and 40, it's a legitimate issue. Does better matter? I'm sure Sophomore Max Smith is better than freshman Max Smith... but is he enough better to make UK viable? Doubtful.

    Gridiron_Joe

  • BlueGhost said...

    Well, when you look at the "for sure" wins, you start at three. Then you have the "no way" games- Florida, South Carolina, Arkansas, Jawja.

    That leaves several possible games- Louisville, Miss State, Missouri, Vandy, Tennessee.

    I guess I could see us winning 40-50% of those games, but our track record in the SEC isn't great. I would say that two of those is a stretch at this point, but the telling game will be the U of L game. If we win that on their turf it could be an interesting season. If not, I think you're looking at 3-5 wins, max.

    While I think your logic is sound and realistic, I still think anywhere from 4 to 8 wins is possible, with 5 to 7 being much more realistic. I predict 6, with 7 being slighty more likely than 5.

    One thing I disagree with is that we will automatically be worse on defense just because we lost Danny and Winston. I think that our young guys up front are going to be much better and we are going to be better on the outside on the D-Line as well. This will make life easier for our young LBers, which are equal prospects to Danny and Winston physically. Only time will tell how they perform, but they should have an easier time, as our D line should command more blockers and set the edge better.

    MossCat15

  • Gridiron_Joe said...

    It's great to say "3-4 wins is just a silly predictino"... but why is it silly?

    Yes, the offense was awful last year. Unless I missed something, that doesn't guarantee that it won't be this year. In fact, it probably will be. The receivers will still be bad, the QB is unlikely to be great, we lost three senior OL starters. The defense might allegedly be better, but remember that we lost a lot-- by my count, at least 39 of our 64 tackles for loss last year were by guys who aren't around, and at least 10 of the 20 sacks, and 13 of our 15 INTs.

    Yes, UK was 5-7 last year. And Ole Miss, by far the worst non-UK team in the SEC is off the schedule, with Arkansas coming on. That shifts the paradigm to 4-8. I think the three cupcakes stay the same (although bear in mind, last year we beat the three cupcakes by 11, 14, and 24). Can we beat UT again? It's possible, but I wouldn't gamble on it. Could we beat Louisville? We could, but we lost to them in our house last year, and they're out recruiting us pretty severely.

    Vanderbilt did more with less last year than any team I can remember. Franklin had a big recruiting year, so I doubt they're getting worse.

    South Carolina? You do remember that it was 54-3 last year? I mean, think about this... if we're 2 TD better, and they're 2 TD worse (and both of those would be wildly optimistic), we'd lose 40-17.

    Mississippi State is always a swing game, but I've seen nothing to make me think we start winning these kinds of games.

    Look, I hope you're right. I'd love an 8-4 season. But I think 4-8 is about a hundred times more likely. UK hasn't won eight games in a regular season since 1977. What makes you think this team is the exception?

    UL beat the worst offense at UK in the past 7 years, by 7, with UK having a shot to tie the game but a dropped pass ended the drive & the game. And don't forget we did play under a new DC with a new scheme. It that an excuse? No but just remember those factors. Plus a OL that was not 100%. Not a excuse but a factor.

    2006 - 31 ranked offense
    2007 - 24 ranked offense
    2008 - 106 ranked offense (Hartline's first season as starter)
    2009 - 93 ranked offense(Hartline injured UK forced to play "others" at QB)
    2010 - 27 ranked offense
    2011 - 118 ranked offense (Out of 120 teams, Newton & Smith combined. Smith as a true frosh)

    The Vandy game was a fluke. And by fluke I mean something was wrong from the start besides a poor offense and a defense that looked lost. Something was wrong with that team and it's been talked about the locker room and the distractions within it.

    UK had beaten Vandy 7 times from 2002-11 and beat them 38-20 last season.

    When we get decent QB production we do much better vs teams like Vandy & UL. That's not my opinion but a fact, go look it up. We even do ok vs other SEC schools not named UF.

    2006 24-20
    2007 13-24
    2008 38-42
    2009 34-27
    2010 33-44
    2011 10-19

    If you haven't guessed that's the six games vs UGA. 2 wins and very competitive games. Games we could have won but for whatever the reason didn't. The point is UGA recruiting classes are much better than ours and it's not even close. But when we have the right mix on offense & defense we can beat them or be in a position to win. Vandy & UL don't recruit like UGA and don't have the depth.

    Now why go through all this you say? What I'm getting at is with decent QB production and hopefully a solid defense in it's second full season we should have a better product on the field. Even with a new LT, LG and RT. We seem to have found a few TE's, we have RB depth, we have some promising Wr's, a solid DT tandem and some nice looking athletes at all three levels.

    Whitaker568

  • Excellent post, Whitaker. Spot on.

    PHCD

  • Gridiron_Joe said...

    Well, when you're losing by 30 and 40, it's a legitimate issue. Does better matter? I'm sure Sophomore Max Smith is better than freshman Max Smith... but is he enough better to make UK viable? Doubtful.

    Listen man, you have resigned to view UK football in a completely negative light, and it's not without reason, and it's obvious. That being said, the same team that ended the year at 8-4 (after a bowl), and arguably our "best" team in 2007 was still getting blown out on occasion.

    It's undeniable that the offense will be improved from last year, and your right, how much is in question. It's also undeniable that the defense started playing much better toward the end of the year and the D-line will be a strength this year. It's also undeniable that almost every player that is now gone is being replaced by a higher rated or more physically ready prospect. if you look at our team as a whole, it is starting to look more like an SEC team should look (and that is my opinion).

    This post was edited by MossCat15 on 4/24/2012 at 7:32 PM

    MossCat15

  • tWhit said...

    I don't see any scenario where our offense isn't much better than last year. Even if Max Smith goes out and we have to play Newton or Towles we should still be better. Robinson is starting to come on, hopefully King will step it up, We need a couple more WR's to step up out of Collins, Fields, Sweat, Bookie, Legree, or Cunningham. Surely we can get two of those guys to give us some production. Stretching the field with Kendrick and Shields should really make us hard to defend if we use them properly and we can protect Max. We've got plenty of backs that can play. I think our D will be about the same or slightly better than last year. With an improving offense they shouldn't be on the field nearly as long as they were at times last year. Plus all the guys having a year in Minters system should help.

    I see 5 wins at the worst and 7 wins at best. Regardless I'm excited for some football.

    I agree with this, but I will put it more simply. We have won between 5 and 7 games the last 6 years in a row (regular season). This team looks similar to the last couple, maybe a little better than last year. Therefore, I predict between 5 and 7 wins again. I really don't understand the doomsayers.

    old jim

  • At the end of the day we still have the worste O-lines and wr core's we've had. By far the weakest in the SEC in a lomg time. Too answer someones question, I do think Whitlow willl be a stud once he starts running good routes.

    todd

  • MossCat15 said...

    Listen man, you have resigned to view UK football in a completely negative light, and it's not without reason, and it's obvious. That being said, the same team that ended the year at 8-4 (after a bowl), and arguably our "best" team in 2007 was still getting blown out on occasion.

    It's undeniable that the offense will be improved from last year, and your right, how much is in question. It's also undeniable that the defense started playing much better toward the end of the year and the D-line will be a strength this year. It's also undeniable that almost every player that is now gone is being replaced by a higher rated or more physically ready prospect. if you look at our team as a whole, it is starting to look more like an SEC team should look (and that is my opinion).

    It's picking at straws, but that 2007 team was NOT blown out. That team's five losses were by 15, 8, 17, 11, and 2. That's a total of 53. We lost to USC by 51 last year. Last year's team lost by 7, 38, 28, 51, 12, 30, and 9. That's a total of 175, making an average margin of loss of 25 points-- more than the 2007 team lost ANY game by.

    Gridiron_Joe

  • todd said...

    At the end of the day we still have the worste O-lines and wr core's we've had. By far the weakest in the SEC in a lomg time. Too answer someones question, I do think Whitlow willl be a stud once he starts running good routes.

    Exactly. The fact that we were awful last year doesn't magically mean we'll be good this year. It means we'll probably still be bad this year.

    Look, for anyone who gets the wrong perspective, I apologize. I would LOVE to eat crow on this. Folks, I was in tears after the UT win last year. I don't say these things because I don't like UK football or don't care. I care very much. I'm just being honest about what I see. I think we have arguably the worst players in the SEC, arguably the worst recruits in the SEC, and arguably the worst coaches in the SEC. I don't see how those three things align to form an 8-4 team.

    I will be rooting for 12-0. I hope Joker is a much better coach than he's shown, that Max Smith will have an Andre Woodson in 2006 kind of jump, that Collins and Sweat turn into Keenan Burton and Stevie Johnson, that the green LBs and DBs are all they're supposed to be, and that special teams somehow arises from the dead.

    But until this staff and this team show me something, I'm erring on the side of suspecting that what my brain says, instead of what my heart says, is true.

    Gridiron_Joe

  • This just isn't true. Our o-line's core of actual talent is probably the best we have had. West and miller are two of the most sought after linemen we have had. The "inside" of our line is probably the best in years.

    In terms of our receivers... Did you not read any reports of the spring game or off season? Yes, last year our receivers were bad. But Robinson and Collins are likely to make a nice impact and king is solid. Add bookie and our incoming freshmen and we will have an obvious upgrade over last year.

    Include max's clear improvement and only a fool would think our offense won't be making a nice step forward.

    Our overall schedule is actually a bit weaker this year than last. Uofl will be a bit better but I think we will be better too. We replace lsu and ole miss with mizzou and an interesting Arkansas squad.

    These discussions of 3-4 wins with a better team are silly. They are based on a hope of some of our fans who are hoping we lose so they can say I told you so, now let's get a new coach.

    If we win 5 or less joker should be replaced. But 3 wins just won't happen.

    hoptownukfan

  • I did a little bit of skimming here, so I could have missed it, but I haven't seen anyone mention special teams. If the punting is as poor as some are making out, special teams could be atrocious this year. No punter to flip field position and a suspect OL spells disaster, IMO. I give us a 20% chance of going 3-9, 55% chance of going 4-8 and 25% chance of going 5-7.

    at Louisville -- ? -- 55%/45% edge to them because it's at their place

    Kent -- W

    Western Kentucky -- W

    at Florida -- L -- Gators have beat us by 30+ four straight years, including the last 2 when they have been very average for them. Put their players in any other uni and I think we'd have a much better chance. We generally psyche ourselves out and lose this game well before it is even played. This streak might reach 50. Really.

    South Carolina -- L -- They are coming off a school record number of wins. Spurrier is already talking ish, so you know he thinks he has a team to contend for the East

    Miss. State -- L

    Arkansas -- L -- top 10 team at their place. No chance whatsoever

    Georgia -- L -- They won 10 straight at one point last year. Little to no chance here.

    at Missouri -- L

    Vanderbilt -- ?

    Samford -- W

    at Tennessee -- L

    Beavis13

  • I'm not trying to downplay the loss of Guy and Trevathan, but I think our D will be okay with the rotation we have at DT. Throw in the hopes of a better offense and the D won't have to see nearly as many reps as they did last season. it's not hard for a very athletic LB to make a thousand tackles when he is only on the sidelines for three downs and a punt.

    I definitely think this team will be better than last year but our schedule is brutal. We could actually field a better team and end up with fewer wins than we had last year. I'm not going to make a prediction for this season but I do expect to see overall improvement in the program. I'm just hoping to see something to build on for 2013.

    rob65

  • Beavis13 said..

    at Louisville -- ? -- 55%/45% edge to them because it's at their place

    Kent -- W

    Western Kentucky -- W

    at Florida -- L -- Gators have beat us by 30+ four straight years, including the last 2 when they have been very average for them. Put their players in any other uni and I think we'd have a much better chance. We generally psyche ourselves out and lose this game well before it is even played. This streak might reach 50. Really.

    South Carolina -- L -- They are coming off a school record number of wins. Spurrier is already talking ish, so you know he thinks he has a team to contend for the East

    Miss. State -- L

    Arkansas -- L -- top 10 team at their place. No chance whatsoever

    Georgia -- L -- They won 10 straight at one point last year. Little to no chance here.

    at Missouri -- L

    Vanderbilt -- ?

    Samford -- W

    at Tennessee -- L

    I'll give you UF until we beat them. Who knows, maybe this is the year?

    But Miss St must replace a lot of production on both sides of the ball.

    Must replace:

    1. Vic Ballard(RB) 1,189 yds & 10 tds
    2. Chris Relf(QB) 1,212 yds passing & 375 yds rushing and 12 total tds.
    3. Starting TE and 3 OL starters & 1 reserve.
    4. Fletcher Cox - Maybe the biggest loss from last seasons team.
    5.. Sean Ferguson(DE)
    6. 2 Key LB's(1 starter & 1 key reserve)
    7. Both starting safeties.

    They do return Tyler at QB but still a lot of production lost on both sides. This is a winnable game and one UK needs to win.

    UT?

    I don't see it myself and to be honest I believe UK wins the second year in a row. They have a decent OL returning and some skill players but the defense will be of UT's low points in many years. UT doesn't scare me at all. UK wins in Knoxville!

    UGA - ?

    UGA is a talented team but we seem to play them pretty tough most of the time. If our offense stays healthy to that point in the schedule we have a "shot" at winning the game. I'm not saying it will be a win or will be easy but we can win this game.

    Ark.?
    At this point they have the better team and that is a fact. But how will things shake out for that program this season with so many things going on within the program? Will they bond closer or fall under the pressure? Only time will tell.

    I can't wait for this season to start. I'm looking forward to the incoming class and getting a look at who comes in ready to help. I believe this team can have a 2006 type season if the offense gets the production that many feel is within reach. Should be fun.

    Whitaker568

  • MossCat15 said...

    While I think your logic is sound and realistic, I still think anywhere from 4 to 8 wins is possible, with 5 to 7 being much more realistic. I predict 6, with 7 being slighty more likely than 5.

    One thing I disagree with is that we will automatically be worse on defense just because we lost Danny and Winston. I think that our young guys up front are going to be much better and we are going to be better on the outside on the D-Line as well. This will make life easier for our young LBers, which are equal prospects to Danny and Winston physically. Only time will tell how they perform, but they should have an easier time, as our D line should command more blockers and set the edge better.

    Winston and Danny were great but its not like we're replacing a couple first rounders. So I agree that our D should be better. Here's why I think so, improved Dupree, Cobble, Rumph, Williamson IMO is an upgrade over Sneed, Neloms becomes a leader in the secondary, and most of all we've finally got some guys that could do some damage in pass rushing situations which is the key to Minters scheme. Not to mention they've all got a year in the system.

    tWhit

  • Gridiron_Joe said...

    It's picking at straws, but that 2007 team was NOT blown out. That team's five losses were by 15, 8, 17, 11, and 2. That's a total of 53. We lost to USC by 51 last year. Last year's team lost by 7, 38, 28, 51, 12, 30, and 9. That's a total of 175, making an average margin of loss of 25 points-- more than the 2007 team lost ANY game by.

    Go check the last UK team to go .500 in the SEC and see what some of their losses looked like....

    WildcatGG24

  • WildcatGG24 said...

    Go check the last UK team to go .500 in the SEC and see what some of their losses looked like....

    Yes he completely failed to address that (I mentioned them together).

    MossCat15

  • tWhit said...

    Winston and Danny were great but its not like we're replacing a couple first rounders. So I agree that our D should be better. Here's why I think so, improved Dupree, Cobble, Rumph, Williamson IMO is an upgrade over Sneed, Neloms becomes a leader in the secondary, and most of all we've finally got some guys that could do some damage in pass rushing situations which is the key to Minters scheme. Not to mention they've all got a year in the system.

    Exactly what I was trying to say. They were great players, but they played ALOT of snaps so the numbers are quite misleading.

    Also, I believe some of Guy's gaudy numbers are due to the position he played in the system (Talking TFL here and also some of his picks were complete misreads by the QB due to scheme).

    This is a whole different animal all together than when we has to field a completely new offense personell wise and a completely new defense scheme wise. Yet we still won 5 games!!

    This post was edited by MossCat15 on 4/25/2012 at 3:50 AM

    MossCat15

  • UK will sweep their OOC foes and beat Mississippi St. and Vandy in conference play. The 'Cats will also beat either SCe or UGa in Commonwealth. Big Blue will be 7-5.

    signature image signature image signature image

    "Nothing great was ever achieved without enthusiasm." ~ Emerson

    alphacat93