-
UKlaw82 said...
I have been a backer of Joker from the beginning, and with the added injury problems I know its even tougher now for him to succeed. And with that, I have not seen the type of play on the field that I thought we would see. It would be easy to say that our offense and defense are simple and vanilla because of injuries/youth and it would have a ring of truth to it. But like back in the days of Claiborne, if we run ONE play with any success, we run it again and again until the defense knows the play better then we do. Heck, sometimes we run the same plays over and over with no success. When you have lesser talent on the field, you better have coaches who can draw up plays in the dirt or in their minds, (think Boise St),because playing by the seat of your pants against teams ranked in the top 20 every week might be the only hope you have. Plus remember, Curry started replacing staff after a period of continuing losing and we know how that worked out. Let the season play out, and lets watch the comedy, I mean the parade of coaches begin, in hopes that this administration can finally get the football problems solved. And it must be a clean house, lets not hinder a new coach by telling him who he must have on his staff. A positive; we are not under any rule violations for once.
-
bluedynasty said...
Even though I felt like bringing back Joker this year was a frutiless and futile effort that was destined to produce what we are now seeing, I supported Mitch and gave him the benefit of the doubt since Joker only had two years in the head seat, I didn't believe the stuff floating around that Mitch doesn't care about football. If Barnhart doesn't make a serious move to bring a legitimate head coach in here and turn this thing around the he needs to be hit by the same door as Joker when they both go next year. I can't believe he would do anything as mindlessly assinine as prolong the pain another year.
Sure, the perpetually addle-brained say "Oh the injuries!... Oh we have no upperclassmen! He needs another year!" What they choose not to grasp though is that we were talking about having mostly freshmen and sophmores two years ago and (if a change isn't made) we'll be saying the same damn thing two years from now.
Every year we hear how we only have 14, 15, 16 schollies to give, but then come February after the annual comedy carousel of attrition, we're handing out 23-25 schollies. And as for injuries Yeah, maybe there is some bad luck involved, but maybe its also because we have to throw a dozen or more true freshmen into the SEC sausage grinder every year without a redshirt year to gain the physical conditioning and knolwedge of the system needed to succeed.
Change needs to be made and if Mitch isn't willing to make it then I'm willing to join the chorus of those saying his position needs to be part of that change. I say "if" though because I simply don't accept he will be that bloody stupid.
And as for bringing two top, firey, hungry young coordinators in here? What promising young guys are gonna risk their careers for a lame duck year of this train wreck. We have older guys like Minter and Cassity now, because young guys saw the writing on the wall and wanted nothing to do with it. You want hungry young coordinators? Bring in a new HC that can at least give them some hope for a future.
You don't bring in coordinators to motivate and prepare the team. You hire a new hea coach who can and will do it.
-
Catmando said...
"And as for bringing two top, firey, hungry young coordinators in here? What promising young guys are gonna risk their careers for a lame duck ear of the train wreck. We have older guys like Minter and Cassity now, because young guys saw the writing on the wall and wanted nothing to do with it."
Good point. There is a reason T Martin left, and part of it is he saw the writing on the wall.
This post has been edited 2 times, most recently by shauner17 on 10/9/2012 at 2:33 PM
-
Catmando said...
"And as for bringing two top, firey, hungry young coordinators in here? What promising young guys are gonna risk their careers for a lame duck ear of the train wreck. We have older guys like Minter and Cassity now, because young guys saw the writing on the wall and wanted nothing to do with it."
Good point. There is a reason T Martin left, and part of it is he saw the writing on the wall.
-
shauner17 said...
So tell me why any already proven Head coach would come here to do the same? IT AIN"T HAPPENING folks. Basketball, we are the destination school. Football, we are what Auburn is in basketball. We are not getting a Gruden or even a Petrino. They have bigger fish to fry then coming to a "basketball" (perception or not) school with and almost non-exsistant home recruiting base.
This post has been edited 3 times, most recently by bluedynasty on 10/9/2012 at 5:21 PM
-
jeffries123 said...
The problem is the administration and fans like being top dog in basketball. Which is fine but its a second rate sport in today's culture. Football is top dog around the country and we should get with the program. We currently have one of the worst head coaches in the country. Our facilities are lacking compared to the rest of the sec but yet we will collect a fat check from the sec. Which will then be distributed to the non revenue sports. Don't get me wrong I like basketball and think it deserves what it gets but we need to better ourselves in football. We need something unique that will bring in fans and recruits. Not a dull head coach and a revolting fanbase.
This post has been edited 3 times, most recently by bluedynasty on 10/9/2012 at 5:47 PM
-
shepp2700 said...
I already tried to tell everyone that he has already been told he has one more year, but changes have to be made on his staff, or he has to go as well.... Per Jake Trenton... Which is a lead pipe lock, so it's whatever... I don't argue about it anymore, gave up getting pissed on by a handful of people that call u an idiot for even saying something other than hire Petrino lol. Go cats, beat the hogs baby!!
"Ignorance is constricted awareness" - Deepak Chopra
-
Deeeefense said...
I would like to know what changes on the staff they think would actually help this program. You can't really complain about the offensive production when we have had players to run it. The Phillips/Sanders era of offense has been fairly good except of 2011 IMO.
Minter has done about as well as can be expected with the deficiency in experienced players. So we change DCs and all of a sudden we win 7 games next year?
The problems with this program IMO are much more structural and managerial from the head coaching side of things not the assistants. It's illogical to give this head coach one more year with the thought that one or two new assistant coaches are all of a sudden going to cure things.
This post was edited by hoptownukfan on 10/10/2012 at 9:01 AM
hoptownukfan
- 3 stars Rating: 56
1137 votes total - (4130)
- 33 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 3 stars
-
bluedynasty said...
Even though I felt like bringing back Joker this year was a frutiless and futile effort that was destined to produce what we are now seeing, I supported Mitch and gave him the benefit of the doubt since Joker only had two years in the head seat, I didn't believe the stuff floating around that Mitch doesn't care about football. If Barnhart doesn't make a serious move to bring a legitimate head coach in here and turn this thing around the he needs to be hit by the same door as Joker when they both go next year. I can't believe he would do anything as mindlessly assinine as prolong the pain another year.
Sure, the perpetually addle-brained say "Oh the injuries!... Oh we have no upperclassmen! He needs another year!" What they choose not to grasp though is that we were talking about having mostly freshmen and sophmores two years ago and (if a change isn't made) we'll be saying the same damn thing two years from now.
Every year we hear how we only have 14, 15, 16 schollies to give, but then come February after the annual comedy carousel of attrition, we're handing out 23-25 schollies. And as for injuries Yeah, maybe there is some bad luck involved, but maybe its also because we have to throw a dozen or more true freshmen into the SEC sausage grinder every year without a redshirt year to gain the physical conditioning and knolwedge of the system needed to succeed.
Change needs to be made and if Mitch isn't willing to make it then I'm willing to join the chorus of those saying his position needs to be part of that change. I say "if" though because I simply don't accept he will be that bloody stupid.
And as for bringing two top, firey, hungry young coordinators in here? What promising young guys are gonna risk their careers for a lame duck year of this train wreck. We have older guys like Minter and Cassity now, because young guys saw the writing on the wall and wanted nothing to do with it. You want hungry young coordinators? Bring in a new HC that can at least give them some hope for a future.
You don't bring in coordinators to motivate and prepare the team. You hire a new head coach who can and will do it.
"Ignorance is constricted awareness" - Deepak Chopra
-
hoptownukfan
- 3 stars Rating: 56
1137 votes total - (4130)
- 33 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 3 stars
-
dj-ky-cat said...
But I also assume he had sense enough to know Guy wasn't the kind of coach you wanted to open the purse strings to lock him down. I think that's been borne out. and if there's anybody around who cares to light the match, Guy is probably on the hot seat at Texas A&M Commerce. As bad as it is to get beat down by Florida, I'd hate to think how awful it would be to lose to Incarnate Word by 3 touchdowns.
hoptownukfan
- 3 stars Rating: 56
1137 votes total - (4130)
- 33 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 3 stars
-
nawlinsbaby said...
Good posts by multiple people on here.
If you've read any of my previous posts then you know my stance on this. Without at least 3 more wins down the stretch I believe he is done. You can preach all you want about youth and injuries. Blah blah blah is all I hear. Every team deals with injuries. It's part of big boy football. Joker has been heavily involved in recruiting all of these players so while he may not have been recruiting coordinator (as was pointed out to me) he did have a hand in all of these players coming here. If this team finishes with 2 wins (assuming we beat Samford) then Joker is done.
It won't be that Mitch wants to fire him. Ticket sales, donors, and sponsorhips will dictate he be fired. Anyone who disagrees with this is just being foolish. In today's game losing the program significant amounts of money will get you canned long before losing games will. If Joker is at the helm next season after a 2 win year, ticket sales will once again drop. While I don't have hard numbers since I do not work for UK, I do know that they lost around $5 million on ticket sales alone this year. I think it is safe to say that the athletic program will lose roughly $10 million this year. He won't get the chance to make that $15-20 million loss next year. Let's not forget, the athletic department at UK is self-sustaining and gets no help from the University. In fact, the University has actually borrowed money from the athletic department. With ideas being tossed around such as renovating Rupp, improving football facilities, building a new baseball stadium, etc..., do you really think they will keep someone on as coach who is essentially responsible (at least in the public's eye) for costing all sports programs money?
As someone else said, it's time people around here realize that football is king in America. It is the cash cow that feeds all the other sports programs. A good football program at UK would do nothing but help improve UK's basketbal program. I can't believe people say that it would hurt it. There is no competition for attention. You have football season and basketball season. Yeah, they overlap a few weeks but it's no big deal. This isn't 1970 people. Or the 50's when Bear Bryant was here. Calipari would love nothing more than for him to be able to bring recruits in here during football season (which is when basketball recruits are allowed to commit) for big games and have a packed stadium with a great atmosphere. He would simply tell the recruits, "if you think this is crazy, wait til you see how they act with basketball." It's simply ridiculous that people think like this today. It's working pretty well at Ohio State. I'm not saying we have to win national titles in football. Just be freakin competitive!
Another thing, what would firing and hiring new coordinators actually accomplish? He has already done that. I guess 4 straight bowl games wasn't good enough for him so he brought in "his people". That is working out well. As someone else said, new coordinators would only add a couple of years to Joker's contract. Because then you have to give him time to get his players working in a new system.
Look, Lexington is a small town and a lot of people on here do know some people with some generally good information. But I will tell you with extreme confidence that unless this team finds a way to win roughly 3 more games this year that there will be a new coach. Now I couldn't tell you if it would be Chuck Smith or Jon Gruden, just to throw out stupid names at completely opposite ends of the coaching spectrum. What do you think makes more sense? Running the risk of losing $10-$20 million next year, or spending another $1-$2 million and offering a coach $4 million a year (I think Jokers salary is $1.8 mil if I'm not mistaken, but that may not be right). It's finally starting to hit the athletic department in the one place that it never has, and the one place it simply can't afford it...the checkbook. Money talks. Without improvement, someone will walk.
-
hoptownukfan
- 3 stars Rating: 56
1137 votes total - (4130)
- 33 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 3 stars
- Post a New Topic
- Back to Topics
- « Previous Topic
- Next Topic »
- Boards ▾
- Pages: 1 | 2 | 3 | 4


Hearing a movement