-
dj-ky-cat said...
It's hard to say how bad a death penalty would be for Penn State. The only comparison we have is SMU, and it effectively did kill the program--it's been 25 years and it's nowhere close to the level they were at. Think of how many track and volleyball scholarships have not been funded there over that period of time.
Penn State would fare much better, I think, but it's just impossible to say how long they'd wander in the wilderness before becoming competitive again.
-
dj-ky-cat said...
It's hard to say how bad a death penalty would be for Penn State. The only comparison we have is SMU, and it effectively did kill the program--it's been 25 years and it's nowhere close to the level they were at. Think of how many track and volleyball scholarships have not been funded there over that period of time.
Penn State would fare much better, I think, but it's just impossible to say how long they'd wander in the wilderness before becoming competitive again.
-
ukaveman said...
Hadn't heard that PSU signed off but if they did, then that answers the due process part of my question. Again, in the end they probably got what they deserved and I'm not shedding a tear over this. Just a bit curious as to PSU options since this really was an unprecedented action by the NCAA.
BigBlueNation 7
- 5 stars Rating: 96
31 votes total - Tyler M
- (170)
- 33 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
ukaveman said...
Now here here is the next logical question. Does everybody here trust the NCAA NOT to use this precedent of action in the future given the NCAA's penchant for irregular decision making. That's probably the only issue I have in basically giving Emmert defacto powers like Goodell or Stern. In short, I don't trust the NCAA and regardless of whether they got this right or not, there is now an opportunity for them to act in this fashion in the future as precedent has been established. Thoughts??


Here are the Penn St. Sanctions...