-
MinterWonderlnd ●
- 4 stars Rating: 63
757 votes total - (1794)
- 26 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 4 stars
-
Matt May said...
But TCU, Boise and Oregon are different situations. They don't recruits against Alabama, LSU, Florida, Auburn, Georgia, Tennessee, Arkansas, South Carolina, etc., etc. just inside their own conference. Oregon fights USC but that's about it from a consistently elite standpoint. Boise's conference brethren are terrible. TCU is the same way. I think we would all agree it's easier to build when you don't have to beat your head against 8 of those type teams each and every week, and on the recruiting trail.
This post was edited by kycatwclaws63632 on 9/19/2011 at 10:35 AM
-
Matt May said...
So Vandy has two nice games and all the sudden it is being used as something to further unhappiness with UK's administration? That's ridiculous. Hal Mumme played a 'nice brand of football' and you saw how long that lasted and what ultimately happened. A lot of coaches have had a few nice games and then reality sets in.
The fact of the matter is the people who don't like Barnhart won't ever like Barnhart. It will always be something. First it's he won't put money into football, then he does and it becomes, well, he doesn't care because he didn't do more. Nothing will ever be good enough for the part of the fan base that thinks Kentucky ought to be competing for the SEC crown every year. No amount of money is suddenly going to change that.
I just wonder if the ones who constantly complain that he doesn't care about football or won't put anything into it have actually ever spent any real time talking to the man. Because if you did, you'd know that's about the most inaccurate thing out there. Just because it's not as easy as people on the outside seem to think or want it to be doesn't mean they don't care and don't WANT to be consistently good.

I'll never attend another game or give money to the K Fund