-
bug said...
Hagan killed the Louisville link for uk by not hiring Schnelly when he almost begged for the job. one of the reasons Howard was not hired by UK (and this is truly unforgettable and unforgiveable) is that Howard wanted to emphasize the city of Louisville and even suggested that he may live there to mine the donors available to UK at that time. The Lex. big wigs and sports adm. were afraid Louisville support would undermine the Lex. big wigs' control over UK sports. Truly SAD!! However, i know Dennis Emery will do a fantastic job in his role as money maker for UK. Having known him since 1989, he is truly a great person and one of the best i have ever been associated with insports. Good luck Coach Emery.
-
hoptownukfan said...
Fundraising overall is amazingly better. Louisville or no Louisville uk is much better off than if they had never hired Barnhart. Brooks for all his good traits allowed his loyalty to get the best of him. Look to the comments of Steve brown for all the perspective you need into the attitude of brooks and "his guys" when he left.
-
MoC said...
A whole lot of revisionist history going on in this thread.
I honestly don't know where to begin. You can probably start with the fact that UK has ranked at the bottom of fundraising in the SEC going back at least 25 years. Or you can start with the fact that the two single largest donations in UK Athletics history didn't come until the last 7 years. Or you can ask yourself what was the last major football facility not paid for by a bond issuance.
At some point folks you're going to have to acknowledge it's more about Kentucky, the culture and politics of the school, Lexington and the state itself, than any one variable. The constants are what matter.
MinterWonderlnd
- 4 stars Rating: 63
757 votes total - (1794)
- 26 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 4 stars
-
5368ppi said...
Where do you get your information? Dead ass wrong!
With the exception of some of the fundraising movements Coach Cal has made, UK fundraising is abysmal. It is like a well that has dried up.
Mitch Barnhart has personally brought in NOTHING from a fundraising perspective.
hoptownukfan
- 3 stars Rating: 56
1136 votes total - (4128)
- 32 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 3 stars
-
hoptownukfan said...
Moron posts like this don't deserve a response. But I'll do it anyway. Ever heard of the kfund? Have you looked at howard capital improvements have been made to our football facilities since mitch got to uk. Last time I'll list them. Here goes.
1. New ribbon boards and jumbo trons and sound system. 2. New practice and game day lockers. 3. New practice fields. 4. Completely renovated nutter indoor facility. 5. Completely renovated nutter football complex including new players lounge, new meeting rooms and new av/video equipment
We need a recruiting room and a bit of a face lift to Cws that includes club level seating, new press box and new sky boxes.
To say Barnhart has done nothing for fundraising at uk shows how miserably uninformed you are. Fundraising didn't exist for the most part before Barnhart got to Lexington!
All of the football improvements I just listed involved NO government funds.
-
5368ppi said...
You are the one miserably informed or maybe your nose is so far up Mitch's ass, you can't see.
So you are going to give Mitch credit for inventing fundraising at UK? Ever heard of the Blue-White fund? It has been around for years. Mitch just renamed it the "K-Fund".
I consider the K-Fund a tax.....not a fundraising measure. It is a luxury tax on ticket sales. When I speak of fundraising, I am referring to raising money through relationships with willing, wealthy alums or friends of UK athletics.
Your statement that "fundraising didn't exist for the most part before Barnhart got to Lexington" is moronic.
This post was edited by hoptownukfan on 9/8/2012 at 11:20 PM
hoptownukfan
- 3 stars Rating: 56
1136 votes total - (4128)
- 32 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 3 stars
-
5368ppi said...
At least we are both UK fans. Besides that, we probably do not agree about much else.
I do not wish to discount Mitch Barnhart. I wish to be fair in properly giving him credit for what he has done, and also note what he hasn't done.
It is late and time for me to go to bed, so my response is very brief.
I will say that Mitch had nothing to do with getting Joe Craft to put up that money for the center. You carefully say he "organized the fundraising". If that would be he graciously accepted the gift, that would be accurate. He had NO role in securing the contribution.
Good night.....GO CATS!
hoptownukfan
- 3 stars Rating: 56
1136 votes total - (4128)
- 32 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 3 stars
-
hoptownukfan
- 3 stars Rating: 56
1136 votes total - (4128)
- 32 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 3 stars
-
hoptownukfan said...
He absolutely had a ton to do with it and Barnhart also worked hard to secure the rest of the funding. Every bit of thy project happened under barnhart's watch. As I said before. You are no different than the rest of The Barnhart bashers. Something bad happens? Mitch's fault. Something good happens? Mitch had nothing to do with it.
We get it. You dont care about reality. Just your misguided and stupid agenda.
-
hoptownukfan
- 3 stars Rating: 56
1136 votes total - (4128)
- 32 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 3 stars




Interesting comment by Mitch Barnhart on fundraising