-
princeuk21 said...
This is getting so old. Our fans (more like boosters) do not realize how important football is to the athletic budget. Right now it's baskeball, basketball, basketball. Don't get me wrong I LOVE our basketball team. But it sucks that the FB team does not get any support from our boosters, and once again ZERO from the state.
E-mail: JDRUM@247SPORTS.COM Follow me on Twitter: http://twitter.com/#!/JDrumUK
Jeff Drummond
- 5 stars Rating: 91
960 votes total - Jeff Drummond
- (16232)
- 33 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
MinterWonderlnd said...
For UK fans, strengthening the football program seems like a more hopeless endeavor than ever based on this news coming out of Frankfort. There are simply too many roadblocks in place to ever allow Mitch or any other AD get the program the capital it needs. Finally, these roadblocks are transparent.
Curious, is Mitch giving Joker more time than planned because he knows these "Frankfort Roadblocks" make the UK job even less appealing than it's been perceived?
E-mail: JDRUM@247SPORTS.COM Follow me on Twitter: http://twitter.com/#!/JDrumUK
Jeff Drummond
- 5 stars Rating: 91
960 votes total - Jeff Drummond
- (16232)
- 33 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
MinterWonderlnd
- 4 stars Rating: 63
759 votes total - (1800)
- 27 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
-
MinterWonderlnd said...
For UK fans, strengthening the football program seems like a more hopeless endeavor than ever based on this news coming out of Frankfort. There are simply too many roadblocks in place to ever allow Mitch or any other AD get the program the capital it needs. Finally, these roadblocks are transparent.
Curious, is Mitch giving Joker more time than planned because he knows these "Frankfort Roadblocks" make the UK job even less appealing than it's been perceived?
-
MinterWonderlnd said...
I guess you're right. You gotta admit though, JDrum......it's absolutely a damn embarrassment that UK officials are still pondering the specifics of a GD "recruiting room" 8 years after it was proposed. LoL. I know the recruiting room really isn't that big of a deal, but to think that this program has had 8 yrs to raise money and plan it out, and is truly still in the "planning stages" is sadly hilarious. That just sums up the ability of lack thereof to get ANYTHING of significance accomplished in that program.
E-mail: JDRUM@247SPORTS.COM Follow me on Twitter: http://twitter.com/#!/JDrumUK
Jeff Drummond
- 5 stars Rating: 91
960 votes total - Jeff Drummond
- (16232)
- 33 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
MoC said...
Keep saying that and you'll keep being wrong.
There's a reason why Mitch and Co. had to create a new donor base even for basketball.
The problem is Kentucky and people no longer here who worked on the fundraising campaigns for both major sports will tell you the same. It's a testament to the team they had that things even got anything done in the first place. Sadly, most of those guys have gone on to greener pastures and are running their own programs now...and having ZERO issues with fundraising for capital projects.
I've been beating this drum since way back in 2003 and everyone just dismissed it as "That's not true So and So has a lot of money, he'll give it." False. Our donor base is and has always been crap. The legislative roadblocks and certain powerful elements on the BoT who see Athletics as the piggy bank for the rest of the University are just a part. Even with those things, a strong and rich donor base could get things done..just like they do at many other schools.
I
-
OptimusBlue5716
- 4 stars Rating: 72
91 votes total - (537)
- 33 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 4 stars
-
JDHLaw11 said...
Is asking for $100MM+ for football-specific improvements from the Legislature not demonstrating commitment?
If it is not, what is "commitment" to you?
Prior to the most recent legislative session, the University had no approval to expend funds, no matter the source (edit: This is incorrect, the statute refers to funds coming from financial instruments, meaning bonds, loans, etc.), to improve Commonwealth Stadium. See Matt's post on page 4. There may or may not have been approval from the Legislature, required by statute, to expend funds in the past, specifically the IMG deal that went south a few years ago. As a matter of fact, I would be very interested to know whether our prior financing proposal with IMG went so far as to seek approval from the Legislature to expend funds, or whether it died before ever reaching that point.
In any event, as it stands today the use of funds, in the amount of nearly $90MM, is approved. While there may be some question as to where the funds will come from, the reality is that our administration requested, and the Legislature approved, the use of these funds for specific football-related improvements.
That demonstrates commitment, certainly far and away above the level of commitment you (and, until recently, I) believe the administration is giving to UK football. The question is now whether the fans, boosters, or corporate sponsors want to demonstrate the same commitment to football as our administration.
OptimusBlue5716
- 4 stars Rating: 72
91 votes total - (537)
- 33 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 4 stars
-
JDHLaw11 said...
Passing the buck to who, exactly? Asking for funds, if those funds are going to be from any type of financial instrument, including bonding, is mandated by statute for UK. The first choice of financial instrument funds, obviously, was to use its own bonding capacity, which has been denied. That does not foreclose the possibility of other financing.
Unless you think there's someone (or group of someones) out there ready to write a donation check for $100MM, asking for funds has to happen every single time.
Read the statute, if UK wants to get money (over $400,000) from any source other than a private donation, to be expended on any real property, it has to ask the Legislature for permission first.
Matt May, speaking with whomever he does within the administration, has told you that, now that it has the legislature's approval, the administration is seeking financing.
You have stated that there is no commitment to the football program. You have direct evidence of funding requests, expenditure approval, and the search for financing, all directly related to the football program. What more does the administration have to do to demonstrate "commitment" to you?
This post was edited by OptimusBlue5716 on 4/13/2012 at 1:39 PM
OptimusBlue5716
- 4 stars Rating: 72
91 votes total - (537)
- 33 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 4 stars
-
DACats86 said...
I think it has gotten to the point that the lack of facilities and obvious lack of commitment to football is now affecting the ability to win. There should have been some positive momentum after the 2007 season.
E-mail: JDRUM@247SPORTS.COM Follow me on Twitter: http://twitter.com/#!/JDrumUK
Jeff Drummond
- 5 stars Rating: 91
960 votes total - Jeff Drummond
- (16232)
- 33 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
Optimus-Blue said...
Jeff, I agree to ceratin point but alot of has do with who asking , CAL has very good relationship with right people and that is great, other coachs not so much , I would be very leary giving anything to UK in football, no donors are giving anything to UK until they show more commitment, heard that from a couple of people who has giving in past. Barnhart cant do it either
E-mail: JDRUM@247SPORTS.COM Follow me on Twitter: http://twitter.com/#!/JDrumUK
Jeff Drummond
- 5 stars Rating: 91
960 votes total - Jeff Drummond
- (16232)
- 33 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
usa1000 said...
Jeff - I agree with you that we have what we need to be successful and I know Mitch doesn't want to "piece meal" the improvement to the stadium, but that may be the world in which we live. According to the numbers in the proposed budgeted we can build the recruiting room, a few extra suites, and do the infrastructure improvements for about $14 million. Well, let's do that first. The department could fund that out of operations over a 2 year period. Build the recruiting room as an addition on the Nutter field house with a walk way over to the stadium. Put in the extra suites and do the infrastructure work. Then, come back with another $10-$15 million project and convert all of the covered seating on the Cooper Drive side to Club Level seating. Then if there needs to be some additional $2 million dollar landscaping and fascade work over time then do it. But if they want to improve the stadium with things that will "potentially" help recruiting and most likely increase revenue just do it. Don't wait on someone else to help us. Most, if not all of that, could be funded with operational money; however, I believe raising $10-$15 million with a plan and drawing is doable even in these times. Do you think that is off base? I am not and engineer or architect, but it seems those projectes are doable.
E-mail: JDRUM@247SPORTS.COM Follow me on Twitter: http://twitter.com/#!/JDrumUK
Jeff Drummond
- 5 stars Rating: 91
960 votes total - Jeff Drummond
- (16232)
- 33 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
- Post a New Topic
- Back to Topics
- « Previous Topic
- Next Topic »
- Boards ▾
- Pages: 1 | ... | 3 | 4 | 5 | Refresh
Kentucky Legislature approves $75 million in bonding