Online Now 454

The House of Blue

The home for all discussion on UK athletics

On this Board 235
Record: 3046 (4/11/2012)

Online now 447
Record: 6210 (3/13/2012)

Boards ▾

The House of Blue

The home for all discussion on UK athletics

The Paddock

The place to discuss general topics outside of Kentucky

UK Ticket Exchange

Buy, sell or swap tickets

Reply

Lance Armstrong gets stripped of all 7 titles...

  • He not only got stripped... he got "raped"! IMO

    Lance Armstrong stripped of all 7 Tour de France titles, banned for life | Fox News

    Cycling's governing body is set to announce Monday whether it will ratify Lance Armstrong's lifetime ban and the loss of seven Tour de France titles ordered by the U.S. Anti-Doping Agency.

    www.foxnews.com
    signature image signature image

    JawJacker

  • JawJacker said...

    He not only got stripped... he got "raped"! IMO

    I agree. I guess it's got to the point where you're guilty if you're just accused. He's never been convicted of anything. There are a lot of people making accusations that are jealous of his success. The drug tests he took never showed anything, not once,

    ukblueforever

  • I dont know if Armstrong did blood doping and performance enhancing drugs but if he did I dont blame him because 99.9% of his competitors were doing just that. If he was going to compete in that world he almost had to do it.

    I will think of condemning Armstrong when all of the others that were doing the exact same thing are punished.

    If Armstrong was cheating he must have been one crafty dude because they never caught him doing it while he was competing. The only evidence they had was the word of some of his jealous competitors that had been caught cheating and were trying to justify it.

    Cll80

  • Who gives a rip about bicycles?

    MatanzasCat

  • MatanzasCat said...

    Who gives a rip about bicycles?

    It's not about bicycles, Slick!!! It's about a competitor that's never been proven to have done anything wrong.banghead

    ukblueforever

  • Free Barry Bonds!!!!!!

    stillDA23

  • It is about a liar, cheater and an embarrassment to our country. I want the money back the post office WASTED on him

    MatanzasCat

  • MatanzasCat said...

    It is about a liar, cheater and an embarrassment to our country. I want the money back the post office WASTED on him

    Well you have some like above, who is embarrasing to listen to, and you have a NCAA type entity who runs things like idiots. If you couldn't catch him 10 years ago for doping WHY take disgruntled riders say so? Lying goes both ways expecially when an organization can make it worth your while to back them even if it is lies.

    UKlaw82

  • MatanzasCat said...

    It is about a liar, cheater and an embarrassment to our country. I want the money back the post office WASTED on him

    wow

    signature image signature image

    JawJacker

  • My big issue with the way that the situation has been handled by the USADA is twofold:

    1. They make it appear, particularly to the US public, as if Armstrong was the only major player in the peloton doping and that Postal/Radioshack/Discovery was the only team doping. This is clearly not true as almost every contender since Le Mond has either been caught doping or has been seriously implicated. Additionally, the sport of cycling has been rife with doping since its inception and doping was legal in the sport until the 60s, I believe (that date may not be right). Amphetamines were a very common drug for riders to abuse. By doing this, meaning by painting only Armstrong and his team in a bad light, they are missing a huge opportunity to help clean up the sport of cycling (and sports in general).
    2. They are missing an opportunity to single out the UCI as a horribly corrupt organization. There was clearly bribery and collusion involved in Armstrong's relationship with the UCI. His "donation" to their doping control division after a positive test in the Tour de Suisse is highly suspect. Without any attempt at pursuing either outright litigation versus the UCI or at least a public shaming the USADA is missing a huge opportunity to clean up the sport of cycling (and sports in general).

    I know many would argue that these are not the goals of the USADA, but at some point a moral imperative takes precedence. At the end of the day, however, these sports will never be clean unless they truly learn to police themselves, meaning that the players/athletes will have to be on board as a group. There will always be cheaters, but without policies and attitudes in to self police it will never work.

    BlueGhost

  • A whole life, a whole career ruined at the drop of a hat. Just makes you wonder since everyone else was also cheating that if everyone were clean would Armstrong have dominated the sport in the same way? Or did he cheat better than everybody else, did the drugs effect his performance differently. We'll never know. I can't imagine what it must feel like to work so hard for something only to have it all taken away knowing that you did nothing outside of the norm. In the end he can't blame any but himself.

    tWhit

  • tWhit said...

    A whole life, a whole career ruined at the drop of a hat. .

    That is equal to saying that Bonnie and Clyde's lifes were ruined by that last shoot-out. No, he had no career outside of cheating so there was no carrer to ruin.

    Appearently everybody else was cheating, but he was the one running the whole process of their cheating also.

    Scum of the earth.gets what he deserves, finally.

    MatanzasCat