Online Now 417

The House of Blue

The home for all discussion on UK athletics

On this Board 179
Record: 3046 (4/11/2012)

Online now 321
Record: 6210 (3/13/2012)

Boards ▾

The House of Blue

The home for all discussion on UK athletics

The Paddock

The place to discuss general topics outside of Kentucky

UK Ticket Exchange

Buy, sell or swap tickets

Reply

New artwork at Nutter...

  • Lists and rankings, by their very nature, are subjective, arbitrary and completely in the eye of the beholder. It doesn't matter what Chris Lowe thinks, what I think, what you think. It matters what players, staff and recruits think and the response over and over and over again is that Kentucky's facilities are well above average.

    This post was edited by Matt May on 6/15/2012 at 2:54 PM

    signature image

    Follow me on Twitter: '@TCPMattMay'

    Matt May

  • I find it intellectually dishonest to hold the opinion that the failure to update a website (not the purview of the AD, but some web administrator somewhere) demonstrates a glaring lack of attention to the football program in the same thread that points out that $160,000 dollars were spent doing something to improve football facilities.

    Spending $160,000 outweighs updating a website, from a commitment standpoint.

    JDHLaw11