Online Now 344

The House of Blue

The home for all discussion on UK athletics

On this Board 151
Record: 3046 (4/11/2012)

Online now 306
Record: 6210 (3/13/2012)

Boards ▾

The House of Blue

The home for all discussion on UK athletics

The Paddock

The place to discuss general topics outside of Kentucky

UK Ticket Exchange

Buy, sell or swap tickets

Reply

Paterno

  • Jeff Drummond said...

    It is hard to understand from the outside looking in, but I think it could happen just about anywhere. When you build up that kind of love and devotion for something over 40+ years, you'll go to great lengths to defend/protect it. I think it's just human nature.

    With each additional piece of info that comes out, however, it's getting harder for even the most loyal supporters to reconcile the awful mistakes that were made.

    Jeff they love him because he did his JOB. He did not do another mans job aka his AD's job.
    He told who he was supose to tell and that is his JOB. I have no love for this man However he did see the act being done it was second hand news to him. You do not go to the Police around your PREZ and your AD unless you have better proof.

    dvillepro1

  • dvillepro1 said...

    I do not know you but I know this you have neaver worked in a job or have neaver been in the service, where you have people above your pay grade to step around. You do with no proof you are toast.
    Hind sight is 100%

    He did not know another person told him what he had herd. He did not see the act he herd the act. You cannot go to the police above your bosses based on what you was told. PERIOD.
    If he did and the man was found not guilty then what you made an ass of yourself and you will neaver coach again. PERIOD. Now if Joe had saw the act then hell yes go over everybody to the po po.
    But guess what he did what I would have done knowing that I did not see it happening and a man is not guilty till proven guilty by my eyes and ears.

    The above is a whole bunch of horse shit.

    I work civilian for the USN. I jumped rank and pissed a whole heck of a lot of people off when my superior was doing something wrong. I got chewed out and had a verbal reprimand put in my file. But, they had to admit I was right and I gave them hell every step of the way when my superior's superior was "discussing" it with me because he didn't like all the flak he caught when I jumped him. I'd do it again in the same circumstances.

    In this case, we are talking about little boys being molested. Worrying about your own skin and chain of command is an excuse that isn't worth a damn. Period.

    The assertion that you cannot go to the police when a felony of that magnitude is reported to you (as opposed to observing it youself) is absolute fucking nonsense. PERIOD! (Look, I can capitalize words too...) There is no other way to describe it. Complete and utter nonsense.

    The assertion that he would never coach again for making an accusation that might have turned out false is more nonsense. He would not have been making an accusation to the police. He would have been reporting an accusation of a significant felony to the police. The assertion he would have been burned for that is more nonsense. Further, there is no moral culpability for reporting to the police an accusation made by someone else even if that accusation turns out to be false. The culpability is on the accuser's shoulders.

    I cannot believe I am reading this absurd cop-out and abdication of responsibility.

    When you (in general) have a serious criminal felony of this magnitude reported to you (in general, again), you have a responsibility to inform the authorities who can investigate and determine veracity. Leaving it up to superiors who have a vested interest in not seeing such things come to light (versus the police whose job it is to root out such things) is an absurd abdication of responsibility. Using fear of your superiors is a pathetic excuse.

    signature image

    rompcat

  • dvillepro1 said...

    Jeff they love him because he did his JOB. He did not do another mans job aka his AD's job. He told who he was supose to tell and that is his JOB. I have no love for this man However he did see the act being done it was second hand news to him. You do not go to the Police around your PREZ and your AD unless you have better proof.

    He didn't tell who he was supposed to tell.

    He was supposed to tell the police.

    Criminal liability was removed because he informed his superiors but morality is NOT defined by legality. That is the most basic of ethics maxims. He was still morally responsible.

    signature image

    rompcat

  • dvillepro1 said...

    I do not know you but I know this you have neaver worked in a job or have neaver been in the service, where you have people above your pay grade to step around. You do with no proof you are toast.
    Hind sight is 100%

    He did not know another person told him what he had herd. He did not see the act he herd the act. You cannot go to the police above your bosses based on what you was told. PERIOD.
    If he did and the man was found not guilty then what you made an ass of yourself and you will neaver coach again. PERIOD. Now if Joe had saw the act then hell yes go over everybody to the po po.
    But guess what he did what I would have done knowing that I did not see it happening and a man is not guilty till proven guilty by my eyes and ears.

    I am a Director of Operations for a very large company with locations on 3 continents. That said...and im going to type this in your language (all caps) so you can clearly read it.

    TO HELL WITH MY JOB IF IT MEANT PROTECTING INNOCENT CHILDREN FROM A PREDATOR!

    To further add, IF (and im sorry but no comp would EVER take on the PR nightmare of firing someone who report child abuse) and only IF i were to be fired for refusing to allow my bosses to cover up not one BUT TWO separate cases of sexual abuse of a child i would own said company.

    There is no job, no status, no amount of damn money more valuable than the safety of a child.

    But im sure you'd have the same ignorant stance if was your son getting "tickled" in the shower by a monster.

    signature image

    tommy

  • rompcat said...

    The above is a whole bunch of horse shit.

    I work civilian for the USN. I jumped rank and pissed a whole heck of a lot of people off when my superior was doing something wrong. I got chewed out and had a verbal reprimand put in my file. But, they had to admit I was right and I gave them hell every step of the way when my superior's superior was "discussing" it with me because he didn't like all the flak he caught when I jumped him. I'd do it again in the same circumstances.

    In this case, we are talking about little boys being molested. Worrying about your own skin and chain of command is an excuse that isn't worth a damn. Period.

    The assertion that you cannot go to the police when a felony of that magnitude is reported to you (as opposed to observing it youself) is absolute fucking nonsense. PERIOD! (Look, I can capitalize words too...) There is no other way to describe it. Complete and utter nonsense.

    The assertion that he would never coach again for making an accusation that might have turned out false is more nonsense. He would not have been making an accusation to the police. He would have been reporting an accusation of a significant felony to the police. The assertion he would have been burned for that is more nonsense. Further, there is no moral culpability for reporting to the police an accusation made by someone else even if that accusation turns out to be false. The culpability is on the accuser's shoulders.

    I cannot believe I am reading this absurd cop-out and abdication of responsibility.

    When you (in general) have a serious criminal felony of this magnitude reported to you (in general, again), you have a responsibility to inform the authorities who can investigate and determine veracity. Leaving it up to superiors who have a vested interest in not seeing such things come to light (versus the police whose job it is to root out such things) is an absurd abdication of responsibility. Using fear of your superiors is a pathetic excuse.

    did you not read the story the police was called they made there investagation back in 98 and they did nothing. Nothing. And I will tell you this if you were in the service and you went around your command you were lucky you were not kicked out. You live and die by your orders and the people above you period.

    dvillepro1

  • tommy said...

    I am a Director of Operations for a very large company with locations on 3 continents. That said...and im going to type this in your language (all caps) so you can clearly read it.

    TO HELL WITH MY JOB IF IT MEANT PROTECTING INNOCENT CHILDREN FROM A PREDATOR!

    To further add, IF (and im sorry but no comp would EVER take on the PR nightmare of firing someone who report child abuse) and only IF i were to be fired for refusing to allow my bosses to cover up not one BUT TWO separate cases of sexual abuse of a child i would own said company.

    There is no job, no status, no amount of damn money more valuable than the safety of a child.

    But im sure you'd have the same ignorant stance if was your son getting "tickled" in the shower by a monster.

    did you not read the story they called th police ok they made there invest and found nothing to prove anything. OK. End of story, a ton of this crap is what it is lecture they try to fit in what they think and not what is proven by Joe. Hear say is what it is. Joe told his boss and the police were brought in.. And the perp was fired then brought back not as a coach but in another order.
    The man was neaver found to have did nothing wrong untill now. ?????
    OH well not worth me fighting over go cats.

    dvillepro1

  • dvillepro1 said...

    Jeff they love him because he did his JOB. He did not do another mans job aka his AD's job.
    He told who he was supose to tell and that is his JOB. I have no love for this man However he did see the act being done it was second hand news to him. You do not go to the Police around your PREZ and your AD unless you have better proof.

    No...he did not do his job whatsoever. You obviously have no knowledge of the report released today. Paterno and 3 other men covered up not one but TWO incidents where a child was molested. It may have not been his job (technically) but it was definitely his moral obligation as a man ass a human being. The first time it happened he and the others covered it up an made it go away. When it happened AGAIN they were forced to cover it up yet again this time to prevent anyone from discovering the first Damn cover up.

    Was it ok in your opinion for JoPa to allow that bastard to remain on campus with kids knowing what he had done?

    As for your opinion...its pathetic and embarrassing.
    Your a Damn coward.

    And if i get banned oh Fn well. If more people spoke out against shit like this and cowards like You Maybe a whole bunch of kids wouldnt have suffered what he did.

    signature image

    tommy

  • dvillepro1 said...

    did you not read the story they called th police ok they made there invest and found nothing to prove anything. OK. End of story, a ton of this crap is what it is lecture they try to fit in what they think and not what is proven by Joe. Hear say is what it is. Joe told his boss and the police were brought in.. And the perp was fired then brought back not as a coach but in another order.
    The man was neaver found to have did nothing wrong untill now. ?????
    OH well not worth me fighting over go cats.

    The covered it up on 98. They covered it up again in 2001. Paterno then allowed the piece of shit to keep bringing kids on campus knowing what he was doing. And lets go with your pathetic take. He still allowed the piece of shit to bring CHILDREN on campus AFTER TWO F**KING INSTANCES!!!! How in Gods name can you defend what he did...or didn't do. Its exactly THAT outlook that Paterno shared with you hat lead to dozens of CHILDREN molested.

    And you actually talked about fear of losing your Fn job being more important than stopping potential abuse...SEXUAL ABUSE of CHILDREN.

    Coward.

    signature image

    tommy

  • First, why does this guy still post on here, especially after this thread? I won't answer that. Second, see the first question....

    signature image signature image signature image

    Nate87

  • Whether I got fired or not I would've went to the police. An assistant coach told Joe pa who wouldn't make that stuff up. That's enough for me to contact the police. I couldn't live with myself knowing something like that and not taking proper action. If the people above my paygrade didn't like it then the hell with them. I would rather work for someone that has higher morals than just a chain of command.

    jeffries123

  • dvillepro1 said...

    did you not read the story they called th police ok they made there invest and found nothing to prove anything. OK. End of story, a ton of this crap is what it is lecture they try to fit in what they think and not what is proven by Joe. Hear say is what it is. Joe told his boss and the police were brought in.. And the perp was fired then brought back not as a coach but in another order. The man was neaver found to have did nothing wrong untill now. ????? OH well not worth me fighting over go cats.

    First, it is absolutely sickening that you would stand up for this man given what has been PROVEN true at this point. There is also no telling how much they were successfully able to keep under wraps.

    Second, i don't know what corporate structure you have ever been a part of, but you are absolutely wrong. Oftentimes, there is a LEGAL DUTY to report criminal activity (and other types of unethical sorts of activity as well) to your boss, and on up the chain of command, until something is done to correct the behavior, including going outside of the "chain of command." I have filed suit on behalf of shareholders for precisely this sort of inaction, and if I represented a company and had knowledge of this type of activity and did not exhaust ALL means to correct it, I would lose my license to practice law. Further, oftentimes corporate bylaws require employees to do the same.

    Third, you seem to be missing the point entirely that not only did Paterno not do his job (he did not convey all of his knowledge of multiple events), but he also used his position of power to persuade those whom he did provide with limited (i.e. he downplayed the story he was given) information to not take appropriate action, which of course inured to his own benefit. It's truly a travesty he was fortunate enough to pass before he was called to justice for this heinous behavior, but I can assure you there is no place at the right hand of his Maker for this sort of monster. If he were still alive, he might even be indicted for aiding and abetting, but criminal law isn't my thing. I know this much, when you cover up activity that directly leads to further criminal activity taking place, you are a liable, be it as a principal to his own crime or as a conspirator/aider and abettor to Sandusky's

    I'm not a woe is me, let's make everyone happy type of guy. If something is wrong, it's probably your own fault. But when it comes to children, they are fully incapable of protecting themselves not only in the eyes of the law but physically, mentally, and so on. I wouldn't wish what has happened to these children on my enemies, and there isn't a hell that's hot enough for Paterno as far as I'm concerned. If you want to defend what he has done, and what he has allowed to take place, you fall in the same category in my eyes.

    This post was edited by mrbaseball2004 on 7/13/2012 at 12:40 AM

    mrbaseball2004

  • Jeff Drummond said...

    That's amazing to me under the circumstances. I know it's still a great school with a lot to offer, but one had to figure there'd be some fallout for at least a couple of years from all the negativity. Kudos to their new staff. They must be doing a remarkable job.

    Jeff, we hear it all the time that UK basketball is bigger than the coach. It is the same at Penn State no matter who is the coach. As they say, they did play football before JP came on the seen and they will continue being a football school.

    signature image

    The meanest dog in Taiwan.

    mrhotdice

  • dvillepro1 said...

    I do not know you but I know this you have neaver worked in a job or have neaver been in the service, where you have people above your pay grade to step around. You do with no proof you are toast. Hind sight is 100%

    He did not know another person told him what he had herd. He did not see the act he herd the act. You cannot go to the police above your bosses based on what you was told. PERIOD. If he did and the man was found not guilty then what you made an ass of yourself and you will neaver coach again. PERIOD. Now if Joe had saw the act then hell yes go over everybody to the po po. But guess what he did what I would have done knowing that I did not see it happening and a man is not guilty till proven guilty by my eyes and ears.

    Dude Joe Pa was the judge jury and executioner at Penn St. He called the shots. No one was above his pay grade.

    tWhit

  • jeffries123 said...

    Whether I got fired or not I would've went to the police. An assistant coach told Joe pa who wouldn't make that stuff up. That's enough for me to contact the police. I couldn't live with myself knowing something like that and not taking proper action. If the people above my paygrade didn't like it then the hell with them. I would rather work for someone that has higher morals than just a chain of command.

    Screw going to the police. If it was someone I knew doing something like that. Someone I had a very close relationship with. I'd got straight to his house and beat his ass for doing something like that in and around my program. Its the absolute worst scandal in college sports history. Penn St. should be burned to the ground.

    tWhit

  • tommy said...

    The covered it up on 98. They covered it up again in 2001. Paterno then allowed the piece of shit to keep bringing kids on campus knowing what he was doing. And lets go with your pathetic take. He still allowed the piece of shit to bring CHILDREN on campus AFTER TWO F**KING INSTANCES!!!! How in Gods name can you defend what he did...or didn't do. Its exactly THAT outlook that Paterno shared with you hat lead to dozens of CHILDREN molested.

    And you actually talked about fear of losing your Fn job being more important than stopping potential abuse...SEXUAL ABUSE of CHILDREN.

    Coward.

    THIS X a million.

    tWhit

  • dvillepro1 said...

    did you not read the story the police was called they made there investagation back in 98 and they did nothing. Nothing. And I will tell you this if you were in the service and you went around your command you were lucky you were not kicked out. You live and die by your orders and the people above you period.

    1. Going to the authorities (and them not doing anything) would have absolved Paterno of a whole lot of responsibility. He didn't do it. I don't know or care about '98. One of Paterno's assistants explicitly told him of the sexual behavior he personally witnessed. Paterno reported up but not to the police. Failure of morality. Paterno testified to that himself: when specifically questioned regarding the account described to him he admitted that it was described as being sexual in nature under oath. There is no way around that.

    2. You said service or a job where one had to go around higher pay grades. My anecdote was USN civilian. Not service by any means (except civil which doesn't mean anything) but it sure is heck is closer than PSU plus I went around much higher pay grades which is the exact specification given. I got away with just a verbal reprimand because I was right regarding a VERY significant deal.

    3. There is no requirement to remain within chain of command regarding criminal matters outside the military. (I have no idea regarding the rules within.) You (in general) may be required to report to your superiors but you cannot be told to not report anything to the police. You (in general) could not lose your job for doing so. Sure as heck not Paterno. Even if one could, so what. Still only one morally acceptable choice.

    4.Legality does not define morality bears repeating. Absolving himself of moral responsibility by reporting to his superiors does not absolve him of moral responsibility to report to the authorities. There is no reason whatsoever to say that police doing nothing in '98 absolves him of responsibility to report either.

    signature image

    rompcat

  • A couple of things:

    1) All of the assistant coaches were aware that Sandusky was under investigation in '98. Subsequently, more coaches even saw Sandusky showering with boys. Then, although JS was banned from facilities he was seen observing weight lifting workouts this time LAST YEAR. The players didn't know who Sandusky was.

    Point to consider... Who but Paterno would allow clearance by this fecal matter to keep dropping by practices? No one had the power but Joe. I believe it was an unspoken agreement and FEAR Paterno had that Sandusky may spill the beans IF he were denied access...

    2) McQueary. Does he look like a wide receiver? How many elite athletes came through those locker room doors? Top 10 recruiting classes abound, yet I think UK now has had more NFL impact WRs in the last 5 years than PSU in the last 15.
    Could it be that McQueary was retained as coach and in the watchful eye of Paterno to assure his loyalty/silence although McQueary is a flat miserable coach?

    Everything stinks about this case.

    Happy Valley was a time machine to the '50's- an enclave of Americana.

    It is all burned to the ground.

    Innocence Lost. Lives ruined.

    This post has been edited 2 times, most recently by Kooky Kats 247 on 7/13/2012 at 7:35 AM

    Kooky Kats 247

  • dvillepro1 said...

    Jeff they love him because he did his JOB. He did not do another mans job aka his AD's job. He told who he was supose to tell and that is his JOB. I have no love for this man However he did see the act being done it was second hand news to him. You do not go to the Police around your PREZ and your AD unless you have better proof.

    False.

    Joe Paterno was the most powerful man at Penn State -- and some could argue maybe all of Pennsylvania -- during his heyday. The athletic director, college president and other administrators may have been his superiors on paper, but he was calling the shots on anything that had the slightest thing to do with football. And despite what he and others have said, they swept this under the rug to protect his precious football program.

    Beavis13

  • Beavis13 said...

    False.

    Joe Paterno was the most powerful man at Penn State -- and some could argue maybe all of Pennsylvania -- during his heyday. The athletic director, college president and other administrators may have been his superiors on paper, but he was calling the shots on anything that had the slightest thing to do with football. And despite what he and others have said, they swept this under the rug to protect his precious football program.

    Correct.

    In 1998 Penn St. was 9-3 and finished #15 in the country. They found out about Sandusky and made the decision to cover it...get rid of Sandusky and project their program which was healthy at the time. You can argue that Paterno allowed (yes...allowed...as mentioned, He was the most powerful man there) Sandusky to remain on campus in order to keep it all quiet.

    In 2001 Penn St. was 5-6 and now people were saying Paterno had lost control and needed to go. With people saying he had lost control shouldn't be coaching any longer once again they found out Sandusky had struck again. There was simply noway they could come forward after already covering it up once. And now instead of protecting a healthy program, they were protecting their secret from 98, and protecting the name and career of Joe Paterno and his obsession with passing Bowden on The all time wins list...or staying ahead of him.

    Imo this isn't just the most disgusting and shameful incident in sports history but our nations history.
    A group of four subhuman, cowardly jokes of men placed a football program above the lives of children.
    Defenseless children. It is our obligation to the human race to protect our children as they are the only innocence in or world.

    I believe there is a God. Sometimes more than other times. Sometimes its hard to when you think about what is going on in Uganda, Rwanda and the Sudan.
    This is one of those times that i truly truly hope there is a God because these men responsible for covering this up deserve to held accountable on a level much higher than what's capable of men.

    I sincerely hope their souls are damned to an eternal hell.

    signature image

    tommy

  • Everyone in power at Pedo State knew that Sandusky was a serial rapist. They did not report him to the authorities. Instead, they:

    --Made sure he got a pension.
    --Gave him an office on campus and keys that would give him access to any athletic facility on campus to use as he pleased.
    --Did absolutely nothing to help his past victims or keep him from abusing new ones.

    I don't know how anyone could look at the facts and come away thinking Paterno -- or any of them, really -- did the right thing.

    Beavis13

  • The "death penalty" has only been used once in college football and that was for paying players if I'm not mistaken. What is the penalty for an institutional coverup of raping children? The football program should be shut down for life. Period. Every statue of that troll protector of molesters should be blown up. Every facade that bears his name should be removed. Notice how I didn't say his name or the name of school or football team? That should be the punishment. Made as if it never existed. Reminds me of a line by Sam Jackson from A Time To Kill, "Yes they deserve to die! And I hope they burn in hell!!"

    Play

    Yes They Deserved to Die... (Samuel L. Jac...

    Samuel L. Jackson expressing his feelings about the two men who raped and killed his daughter to a Southern court room

    http://www.youtube.com/v/sMGMZsKXz94
    signature image

    CarlLexington

  • rompcat said...

    The above is a whole bunch of horse shit.

    I work civilian for the USN. I jumped rank and pissed a whole heck of a lot of people off when my superior was doing something wrong. I got chewed out and had a verbal reprimand put in my file. But, they had to admit I was right and I gave them hell every step of the way when my superior's superior was "discussing" it with me because he didn't like all the flak he caught when I jumped him. I'd do it again in the same circumstances.

    In this case, we are talking about little boys being molested. Worrying about your own skin and chain of command is an excuse that isn't worth a damn. Period.

    The assertion that you cannot go to the police when a felony of that magnitude is reported to you (as opposed to observing it youself) is absolute fucking nonsense. PERIOD! (Look, I can capitalize words too...) There is no other way to describe it. Complete and utter nonsense.

    The assertion that he would never coach again for making an accusation that might have turned out false is more nonsense. He would not have been making an accusation to the police. He would have been reporting an accusation of a significant felony to the police. The assertion he would have been burned for that is more nonsense. Further, there is no moral culpability for reporting to the police an accusation made by someone else even if that accusation turns out to be false. The culpability is on the accuser's shoulders.

    I cannot believe I am reading this absurd cop-out and abdication of responsibility.

    When you (in general) have a serious criminal felony of this magnitude reported to you (in general, again), you have a responsibility to inform the authorities who can investigate and determine veracity. Leaving it up to superiors who have a vested interest in not seeing such things come to light (versus the police whose job it is to root out such things) is an absurd abdication of responsibility. Using fear of your superiors is a pathetic excuse.

    Here's the deal. When you are in a position of authority, say like a commanding officer, and you have to face an issue like this then you have several obligations. First and foremost, the accused is presumed innoncent and care must be given not to wantonly tread upon that and impede any succeeding investigation. Secondly, and JUST AS IMPORTANT, you have an ABSOLUTE OBLIGATION to PROTECT THE VICTIM to the BEST OF YOUR ABILITIES. But, and here's the kicker, you are legally and morally obligated to ensure the matter is completely and thoroughly investigated and to not do so is a blantant violation of the duties and responsibilities that you've been entrusted with. Granted, Paterno wasn't sworn in to "support and defend against all enemies foreign and domestic" but as the defacto head of PSU, he was ABSOLUTELY obligated to report and follow up on the 2001 allegation.

    The PSU leadership err'd way to much protecting Sandusky's reputation (as well as the institutions) and did NOTHING to help the victims. If the 98 investigation didn't set off red flags then certainly McQreary's statements to the PSU leadership should have. Bottom line is while I can, by just a little bit, understand why PSU officials took some caution to ensure they didn't smear Sandusky upon learning of allegations in 98, there is ZERO excuse for what happened afterwards. Two known seperate incidents, one witnessed by a PSU coach, and NOBODY did anything. There was NO attempt to find the alleged victim, ensure his well being, get his side of the story and most importantly, ensure he was safe from a child predator. It's shameless, inexcusable and doesn't pass the smell test. JoePa had a MORAL obligation, if not legal, to follow up and ask specifically what the administration was going to do about it. Instead, at best he willingly turned a blind eye to the whole issue and kept his head in the sand until it blew up last year. I LOVED JoePa and have had a hard time reconciling the fact that he failed when the odds were the greatest and many children suffered because of his failure. It's as simple as that.

    ukaveman

  • dvillepro1 said...

    I know alot of you will not agree with me. But I have worked in the corp world for a long time. He took what he knew (JOPA) and told them evrything it is there job not his to take further action. What they do is above his pay grade. If he had went around the AD and the Pres he would have been fired.

    He is in no way the police of the AD Dept. He is the head coach. He did not see what had happend it was second hand news to him. The person who saw the act or acts is the one who should have went to the police, if the AD did not do anything. Joe did what every coach would do, turn over what you know to the Ad and let them do what they are paid to do. Yes Joe could have done more based on another persons opinon of what he saw. I have no love for joe none at all. But I do know how it works from pay grade to pay grade. My father was a full bird col in the US MCorp.

    You go around your superiors and you get the hammer....

    Accidently hit, "Up" instead of "down"

    Yes, he told his bosses and his bosses had alot of accountability....BUT, this is a criminal matter and he was to report it to the police.

    It should not have been Joes decision to make. If he told his bosses, then they should have told the police as well.

    This post was edited by bigbluemist on 7/13/2012 at 2:12 PM

    bigbluemist

  • dvillepro1 said...

    I know alot of you will not agree with me. But I have worked in the corp world for a long time. He took what he knew (JOPA) and told them evrything it is there job not his to take further action. What they do is above his pay grade. If he had went around the AD and the Pres he would have been fired.

    He is in no way the police of the AD Dept. He is the head coach. He did not see what had happend it was second hand news to him. The person who saw the act or acts is the one who should have went to the police, if the AD did not do anything. Joe did what every coach would do, turn over what you know to the Ad and let them do what they are paid to do. Yes Joe could have done more based on another persons opinon of what he saw. I have no love for joe none at all. But I do know how it works from pay grade to pay grade. My father was a full bird col in the US MCorp.

    You go around your superiors and you get the hammer....

    As you have been told repeatedly by others, you couldn't possibly be more wrong on all counts. Your "chain of command/pay grade" doesn't even remotely apply in this situation. It's not like McQueary told Paterno that he saw Sandusky stealing some practice jerseys or cleats out of the field house. He was sexually assaulting a young boy, and Paterno was only concerned about his legacy and the image of Penn St. The same goes for McQueary, Spanier, Curley and Shultz in that they were only concerned about their careers and the image of Penn St. I don't see how any of them can look at themselves in the mirror, especially McQueary, who saw it first hand and had the opportunity to put a stop to the horror, but instead worried more about his career. Thanks to these selfish cowards, the lives of other boys were ruined. Hands down the most disgusting thing I've ever seen in my years of following college athletics.

    JDHoss

  • Interestingly enough, the notion was brought up today that Paterno likely would have faced criminal charges himself had he lived (namely conspiracy) much like I imagined when posting last night. Like I said, criminal law isn't my thing, but if anyone reading is knowledgeable and can fill in the blanks, I'd be VERY interested to know how it is possible that Schultz, Curley, McQueary, and Spanier haven't been charged, if Paterno himself could have been.

    I rarely express much opinion one way or the other when it comes to the legal system as it pertains to criminals... but in this case, I truly hope that the full wrath of the law is brought to bear upon them all. It won't give back what was stolen from these kids, but it's a (minimal) step in the right direction.

    mrbaseball2004