Online Now 395

The House of Blue

The home for all discussion on UK athletics

On this Board 227
Record: 3046 (4/11/2012)

Online now 403
Record: 6210 (3/13/2012)

Boards ▾

The House of Blue

The home for all discussion on UK athletics

The Paddock

The place to discuss general topics outside of Kentucky

UK Ticket Exchange

Buy, sell or swap tickets

Reply

Petrino is the next coach at

  • GOT: PETRINO?

    Just working on my new T-shirt

    signature image signature image

    JawJacker

  • Chiuk said...

    Dude - you clearly don't understand how the law works.

    Lets say UK hires Petrino. Lets say he hires a "staffer" outside the rules of state hiring requirements...like he did at Arky. Let's say someone sues UK for not properly posting the job.....

    UK's potential penalty in theory could be worse since they were put on notice of Petrino's past discretions, yet still hired him.

    Lets be clear...this scenario is highly unlikely. But it does present a theoretical "legal risk" to UK.

    She probably wouldn't sue for as much as Joker's buyout, so it's all relative.

    I'm as much against Petrino as anybody. I think he's a bad guy. Football is a social sport--you can't do it on your own and eventually his petulant behavior will catch up with him. He needs players, recruits, assistants, administration, high school coaches, media, and even fans. Maybe he could take the UK job and win enough to cover up his social shortcomings, or maybe this is the job where he'd implode like Billy Clyde, another very adept tactician whose ill-formed personality caught up to him.

    djkycat54906

  • BP will be our OC and TD will be our HC

    jimlowe7

  • jasonukfan said...

    JDH

    Again, I don't see much risk. It's not like he's going to make the mistake of hiring his girlfriend again. I'd bet that he never felt comfortable with the situation he put himself in with her to begin with. Love can make a person do stupid things. When I talk about risk of hiring a coach, I'm concerned with NCAA probation and things of that sort.

    By the way, I think he was ultimately fired at Arkansas because they just didn't think they needed him to win. Then they found out the hard way just how wrong they were. I would argue that Pitino was in a worse situation at Louisville, but they weren't forced to fire him because of it. It was certainly more embarrassing to the University. I mean, legal statements about a sexual encounter with explicit and graphic details, a blackmail of the head coach by another Athletic Department employee, and an FBI investigation and show trial. Good lord! Petrino's relationship with his girlfriend was part of his private life, in my opinion and as far as I'm concerned. Did he get her hired in the Arkansas offices, yes, but I've seen and heard about that happening many times before, even in the corporate world. I think Arkansas' AD only fired him because he didn't want to take any heat himself. He was spineless and he panicked. All he had to do was stonewall the media and let Petrino take all of the heat himself. If he did that they probably wouldn't be looking for a coach right now, and possibly could be in the hunt for a national championship. I've never seen a better example of just how good a head coach must be than how disoriented Arkansas has been without Petrino. I think that example, more than any other, has shown just how good he is at leading a football team. I'd love to see what he can do with the Kentucky program.

    Completely wrong on all counts. Arkansas had no other choice but to fire him. I have been with my employer for 28 years and my work record is spotless. If I hired someone I was having sex with into a job, I would be fired on the spot, and it wouldn't even matter if I was single.

    You'd bet he never felt comfortable with the situation he put himself in to begin with? Really? He started boinking her while knowing she was engaged to a fellow employee in the AD. Yeah, he was so uncomfortable with it that he hired her into a job over dozens of far more qualified applicants, and into a job where he could continue boinking her right under her fiance's nose, and even getting the university to finance it for him. Bobby Petrino is a stupid, ethically challenged, pathologically lying SOB. There's really no other way to describe him accurately.

    JDHoss

  • Impressive. How would you describe our football program?

    zcats

  • Footballcat65 is Steakcat on CatsIllustrated. He started this same thread on two different forums, even using the same claims that he has "lawyers" that work for him.

    I'm calling BS on his claims, about Petrino and about these "lawyers" that work for him. I'm curious what sort of business SteakFootballCat65 has that employs lawyers. Want to share some info on that, Steak?

    JDHLaw11

  • What kind of business could he be in that didn't employ lawyers? I've yet to run across one myself...

    signature image

    pb1992

  • Rumors must be true, I saw him in Lexington this morning, snapped a pic for proof:

    attachment

    Hooplehead

  • Hooplehead said...

    Rumors must be true, I saw him in Lexington this morning, snapped a pic for proof:

    Looks like he is already bringing talent with him

    truecatfan4life

  • pb1992 said...

    What kind of business could he be in that didn't employ lawyers? I've yet to run across one myself...

    There's a difference between hiring lawyers to represent you and having lawyers that work for you. So maybe I just need clarification?

    What his business is, do the lawyers work for him or do they simply represent the company, and how having lawyers that represent your company imparts their legal knowledge on matters outside the scope of their representation to the business owner. That would suffice, I guess.

    JDHLaw11

  • ThIs is sme clown jacking U& fans around. Come on people this is nonsense.

    bigcat65

  • JDHLaw11 said...

    Footballcat65 is Steakcat on CatsIllustrated. He started this same thread on two different forums, even using the same claims that he has "lawyers" that work for him.

    I'm calling BS on his claims, about Petrino and about these "lawyers" that work for him. I'm curious what sort of business SteakFootballCat65 has that employs lawyers. Want to share some info on that, Steak?

    I'd ignore him except his posts are so insanely stupid that they are entertaining.

    hoptownukfan

  • rompcat said...

    What you stated is slightly different than what I stated with that difference being important.
    So, does that make footballcat65 incorrect for saying there are no legal risks attached to Petrino?
    What about his statement that JDHLaw is a liar for stating there are risks attached?

    Maybe UK has vetted the situation, and have hammered out contract details to assist in preventing the same situation from happening at UK (proactive, mitigation, on UKs part), and therefore UK feels comfortable that there is no real legal risk.

    Again, Im obviously speculating here and we are assuming this info is legit, but if there were ever a potential legal risk in hiring BP, UK could protect itself.

    Further, I HIGHLY doubt BP would be stupid enough to make the same mistakes twice....if the guy has any conscience he'd be counting his blessings wherever he may land as a HC.

    Chiuk

  • Chiuk said...

    Maybe UK has vetted the situation, and have hammered out contract details to assist in preventing the same situation from happening at UK (proactive, mitigation, on UKs part), and therefore UK feels comfortable that there is no real legal risk.

    Again, Im obviously speculating here and we are assuming this info is legit, but if there were ever a potential legal risk in hiring BP, UK could protect itself.

    Further, I HIGHLY doubt BP would be stupid enough to make the same mistakes twice....if the guy has any conscience he'd be counting his blessings wherever he may land as a HC.

    I'm not sure how you contractually prevent someone from doing something they already are not allowed to do but choose to do anyway. I don't see how helps UK free itself from the associated risk

    signature image

    rompcat

  • Chiuk said...

    Maybe UK has vetted the situation, and have hammered out contract details to assist in preventing the same situation from happening at UK (proactive, mitigation, on UKs part), and therefore UK feels comfortable that there is no real legal risk.

    Again, Im obviously speculating here and we are assuming this info is legit, but if there were ever a potential legal risk in hiring BP, UK could protect itself.

    Further, I HIGHLY doubt BP would be stupid enough to make the same mistakes twice....if the guy has any conscience he'd be counting his blessings wherever he may land as a HC.

    If it were only the affair I wouldn't have a problem with it. It's his repeated lack of moral compas on any level that gives me hesitation.

    Whether its him lying over and over about the auburn meeting, him leaving without talking to players, lying to his employer at Arkansas over and over,
    Lying to the police, etc...

    It's one thing to have poor judgement. We all do. It's another to lie once you get caught. That's the patter that concerns me. He has poor judgement and an his reaction when he gets caught is to lie.

    If Mitch thinks he is reformed then I'm cool with it, but I see a pattern.

    It sucks because I think the guy is a pretty good coach.

    hoptownukfan

  • UK could still suffer legal liability in hiring BP regardless of any wording in a contract. Having particular wording in a contract would not protect the university. UK could still face legal liability in hiring him because of their knowledge of previous past actions of Petrino. This is a legal fact.

    Should a company hire someone with full knowledge of a previous sexual harrasment incident, and that person again sexually harrass someone, said company coukd still suffer legal liability regardless if any wording in a contract or aggrement of employment.

    So, all the talk if UK simply wording his contract to protect the univeristy is useless.

    signature image

    tommy

  • Footballcat, I'm gullible enough to believe you. Will we hear something on monday?peace

    23jumpboy

  • JDHLaw11 said...

    There's a difference between hiring lawyers to represent you and having lawyers that work for you. So maybe I just need clarification?

    What his business is, do the lawyers work for him or do they simply represent the company, and how having lawyers that represent your company imparts their legal knowledge on matters outside the scope of their representation to the business owner. That would suffice, I guess.

    Fair enough. I didn't pick up the lawyer comment when I read it initially.

    signature image

    pb1992

  • Hooplehead said...

    Rumors must be true, I saw him in Lexington this morning, snapped a pic for proof:

    I wonder what his recruiting pitch was with this one.crackwhip

    sleepydog

  • dvillepro1 said...

    There is no truth to his post. My daughter works for the UK compliance office and she just left my house for thanks giving. BP is not and has not been contacted by UK not ever.

    He will not be at UK unless his new team in the next few yrs plays UK at UK.

    He is to much of a risk even for UK. Mitch is not going to put his rep on the line for that idiot.

    Move on people... And my source is for real.

    Thanks for confirming what I have said, per my friends, that BP has not and will not be hired as KYs next football coach. Now I know that a lot of people claim to have sources about this matter but you are stating something that is coming from someone who would know the situation and my 2 buddies have intimate knowledge of the situation and they have never lied to me about anything they have confided in me, so IM going with what your daughter and my buddies have said about the matter and I feel relieved.

    sleepydog

  • UKcats60 said...

    Not doubting you personally, but I have to ask why it hasn't been announced yet since Petrino isn't at another job right now. Why the delay, when we need the next coach on the recruiting trail asap?

    Mitch allowing Joker to finish out the year. If true, very classy move by Mitch. This is really interesting information, and we should know by Monday if this is true.

    Cats Den

  • sleepydog said...

    Thanks for confirming what I have said, per my friends, that BP has not and will not be hired as KYs next football coach. Now I know that a lot of people claim to have sources about this matter but you are stating something that is coming from someone who would know the situation and my 2 buddies have intimate knowledge of the situation and they have never lied to me about anything they have confided in me, so IM going with what your daughter and my buddies have said about the matter and I feel relieved.

    Your buddies have any idea if who will get the job?

    hoptownukfan

  • footballcat65 said...

    Slinger you are one of the posters I respect. I understand you being reluctant but have I ever been wrong before?

    Not very modest are you?horn

    ukblueforever

  • You guys might want to check some of the other boards. Something is up, looks like as early as tomorrow.

    Katonic

  • hoptownukfan said...

    Your buddies have any idea if who will get the job?

    They havent confided that to me yet but when I hear I will go out on that proverbial limb and post it. I have contact with them over the phone since they live there in Lexington and I live in Ohio. I should speak to them sometime tonight or tommorow am and hopefully they will have some news. They did tell me that a decision would be coming very soon but Mitch is being very guarded. with his info. I think if something comes out real early it will come from the coach that has been hired his side.

    This post has been edited 2 times, most recently by sleepydog on 11/23/2012 at 2:36 PM

    sleepydog