-
BELIEVEinBLUE
- 5 stars Rating: 86
160 votes total - (728)
- 30 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
JDHoss said...
I'm glad you agree with my description of Petrino, and FWIW, I have yet to find anyone who directly refutes it. They usually just respond with a question that doesn't pertain to Petrino. I will say this. Unlike many of the rubes across the various UK boards who seem to be "Petrino or slit their wrists"....I will support him if he is hired just like I will anyone else. My opinion of him won't change. He will still be a stupid, ethically challenged, pathologically lying SOB....but he will be OUR stupid, ethically challenged, pathologically lying SOB, and he will have my support. BTW, to ansewr your question, I would describe our football program as down. It's usually what folks in my neck of the woods say when their favorite sports team is struggling.
of his coaching ability but is better than Jokers
-
hoptownukfan
- 3 stars Rating: 56
1136 votes total - (4128)
- 32 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 3 stars
-
BELIEVEinBLUE
- 5 stars Rating: 86
160 votes total - (728)
- 30 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
tommy said...
UK could still suffer legal liability in hiring BP regardless of any wording in a contract. Having particular wording in a contract would not protect the university. UK could still face legal liability in hiring him because of their knowledge of previous past actions of Petrino. This is a legal fact.
Should a company hire someone with full knowledge of a previous sexual harrasment incident, and that person again sexually harrass someone, said company coukd still suffer legal liability regardless if any wording in a contract or aggrement of employment.
So, all the talk if UK simply wording his contract to protect the univeristy is useless.
-
sleepydog said...
I agree also and you will know how much if you have read my thread on him. I dont put things the way you do but the sentment that I have is the same as yours. He is ethically challenged and will do the same to UK as he has done to the other people that have employed him. An interesting stat that I saw recently is that BPs SEC record is 17-15, if thats true then thats hardly a ringing endorsement of his coaching ability.
-
JDHLaw11 said...
You realize that footballcat65 (here) and steakcat (CI) are the same poster, right? The only "confirmation" outside of a single poster has been the unbelievable tale that someone talked with "Bob" Petrino on the phone during Thanksgiving dinner with his family.
If Petrino is announced as coach tomorrow, I will patronize footballcat65's business, whatever it may be.
-
Chiuk said...
Did BP also side-step state hiring requirements? Which could also lead to legal action against the university (Arky).
Im also not following you - are you saying BP has sexually harassed other employees at Arky? If so, what is the evidence?
I understand the risk with his mistress whom he hired.....but I just dont understand what you mean with your comments.
-
JDHLaw11 said...
Man, I've done a much longer post on this in the past. Hiring him will hamper, if not completely eliminate, an affirmative defense for the University. This affirmative defense would generally make the University immune in a sexual harassment suit as well as eliminate the vicarious liability of the University.
So: The risk is someone accuses him of sexual harassment at UK and UK is inextricably involved in the lawsuit, rather than being able to remove itself quickly and fire Petrino immediately without having further problem, much like Arkansas did.
-
JDHLaw11 said...
Man, I've done a much longer post on this in the past. Hiring him will hamper, if not completely eliminate, an affirmative defense for the University. This affirmative defense would generally make the University immune in a sexual harassment suit as well as eliminate the vicarious liability of the University.
So: The risk is someone accuses him of sexual harassment at UK and UK is inextricably involved in the lawsuit, rather than being able to remove itself quickly and fire Petrino immediately without having further problem, much like Arkansas did.
-
BELIEVEinBLUE
- 5 stars Rating: 86
160 votes total - (728)
- 30 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
- Post a New Topic
- Back to Topics
- « Previous Topic
- Next Topic »
- Boards ▾
- Pages: 1 | ... | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8



Petrino is the next coach at