-
jeffries123 ●
- 4 stars Rating: 61
191 votes total - (270)
- 29 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 4 stars
-
jeffries123 said...
28-10 Louisville. I think louisville defense takes advantage of a inexperienced o-line. I also think our secondary struggles early on. So I think Bridgewaters has a big game. Plus our linebackers are young and inexperienced. Dupree will be a monster but i'm worried about the others. That home crowd they will have will be obnoxious and rowdy so that will also be hard to overcome. JMO.
-
JDHLaw11 said...
My opinion on the position comparisons is as follows:
QB: I give a slight edge to UL here. Bridgewater got a lot of experience last year taking snaps and growing in the offense. Although I think Max has a chance to do well for us, there is little doubt which of the two Sophomores has the edge in experience.
RB: I give UK a slight edge in RB here. Mainly because we return everyone, while UL loses its leader in rushing and APY. I'm basing this comparison on the thought that Clemons will be ready to go.
WR: UL gets a slight edge here due to last year's performance. I give King the nod over Parker, but we have to find some other guys this season that will produce like Rogers and Harris.
OL: Slight edge to UK. As bad as UK's line was last season, UL's line didn't fare much better. We return Smith and Warford, with Miller getting experience. UL returns their C and RT and plug the gaps with young players. Sounds pretty familiar, actually.
DL: Edge to UK. UL is really struggling with DT depth and lost several productive guys. UK returns Cobble, Rumph, Ukwu, Davis, and Coleman, all who saw extensive snaps last year.
LB: Slight edge to UL. UK lost all four starters, but Williamson and Dupree saw significant time last year. Might have an issue at Will. UL only lost its MLB, but moved its SLB to MLB, so is basically breaking in two new starters.
CB: Edge to UL. Bushell is a good one and they are returning both starters. UK will lean on Rice, who saw plenty of snaps, but Caffey is still unknown, not having played a game snap at the position.
S: A wash. I like Neloms just as much as Smith. Both guys are good players. The other safety position will be either a walk-on (UK) or a relatively young guy for both teams (Lowery v. Johnson).
With all of that said, I don't know what to expect on Sept. 2. If we see a fired-up UL squad like we did last year in Commonwealth and UK comes in flat like in so many games early in the season, it will be a loss, barring some extreme lucky bounces. If we see the same intensity and execution from the UGA and UT games, and UL comes out over-confident, UL will take an L to begin the season.
Either way, we'll know a lot more about our respective teams on Sept. 3.
-
JHB4UK said...
You must be a very casual Little Brother football fan to brazenly predict your team to be excellent to start the season when in Strong's first 2 seasons his teams have been far FAR from that. Study up on your first 4 game results of 2010 and 2011 to better educate yourself and have a more reasonable expectation.
-
shepp2700 said...
Only 10 points difference by not putting his foot on the brakes? Well, either way, hope we score more than 7, I feel like our offense is going to be much better than last year and we mustered out more than 7, unless UL D has improved that much....? U got a summer depth chart, I have been askin to see one on this thread (last time I will ask, sorry to be repetitive)?
-
Alanin502 said...
2010 - Team adapting to new coach, new playbook = slow start to season 2011 - Second youngest team in america playing mostly freshmen = slow start 2012 - Returns just about everyone although still young overall but with added depth
Who said Cards would be excellent from the start? Not me. They are still a young team.
This post was edited by ukblueforever on 7/27/2012 at 3:23 PM
-
ukblueforever said...
But, the difference is their young players are better than our young players. I think their skilled players are better than UK's at every position. If UL gets up 10+ early, it could get ugly. I say 31 -10 UL. I hope UK pulls it out. I just think UL has got it turned around and UK has gone the other way. Time will tell.






Probably too early, but the wait is killin me...