Online Now 434

The House of Blue

The home for all discussion on UK athletics

On this Board 656
Record: 3046 (4/11/2012)

Online now 1219
Record: 6210 (3/13/2012)

Boards ▾

The House of Blue

The home for all discussion on UK athletics

The Paddock

The place to discuss general topics outside of Kentucky

UK Ticket Exchange

Buy, sell or swap tickets

Reply

The Good, The Bad & The Ugly

  • http://kentucky.247sports.com/Article/The-Good-The-Bad-The-Ugly-40516

    From a much-awaited breakout game for a UK receiver to ongoing struggles on the line and a potential season-sinking setback, it's "The Good, The Bad & The Ugly."

    signature image

    E-mail: JDRUM@247SPORTS.COM Follow me on Twitter: http://twitter.com/#!/JDrumUK

    Jeff Drummond

  • Couldn't disagree with any of it, except the OL play being ugly.....IMO it just defies description.....

    JDHoss

  • Good summary, nothing much to add except that the half glass full description of the Oline is that several of these guys have played against the best teams in this league in the past and have performed well so we know it's in them, the coaches just have to find a way to get it out of them.

    Overall this team is just performing well under it's potential. Execution at several positions is just disjointed and inconsistent, but it isn't due to a lack of talent. I still maintain that we have enough players to play with any team on our schedule, but at this juncture playing at full potential seems a long, long way from here.

    In college football a lot can happen in a week, let's hope it does.

    This post has been edited 2 times, most recently by Deeeefense on 9/18/2011 at 6:58 PM

    "Ignorance is constricted awareness" - Deepak Chopra

    Deeeefense

  • Well, the part about the TEs getting some passes their way, is encouraging since we recruited some and they have been mysteriously conspicuously absent in recent years with ALL KINDS of excuses. However, real reason they were not getting passes might not have been they dont block well so they dont deserve a pass their way. or, they cant catch. These were ridiculous excuses. they wont ever catch anything if the qb doesnt throw them the ball. This mistake was on the coaches and the know it.
    Playcalling in the red zone WAS bad but it was also bad the whole game for the most part so dont let Randy off the hook so easily. Again, even the announcers commented on it. How many hints does the OC and HC need to get?
    These announcers see games all the time and they know when the OC is not getting it done,.
    The OL? I dont need to say anymore except Joker needs to show some passion on the sidelines and get in their grill and call them out.

    This post has been edited 2 times, most recently by ukfit on 9/18/2011 at 7:04 PM

    ukfit

  • You might include the fanbase's mood after the game under "Ugly." I know mine was.

    snarkster

  • Bad:

    Giving up the big play. All of UofL's TD's came from beyond 25 yards. Bridgewater and Stein completed 12 passes and a quarter of them went for long TD's. UK either had trouble getting to the quarterback or finishing when they did manage to get in Bridgewater's face. The DB's never turned to play the ball on the scoring passses either.

    Lost in the O-line's struggles was the fact that a mostly rookie Louisville offensive line manhandled a bigger and more veteran UK D-Line at the point of attack. Louisville averaged 4.5 yds/carry. Once Bridgewater entered the game UK's defense overpursued and created cutback lanes which gave the Louisville offense momentum.

    Ugly:

    Strong has been in Louisville for two seasons and already they have more playmakers and better athletes at the skill positions. Strong's big recruiting wins were all over the field and the stat sheet last night. They are bigger and faster on the outside and Bridgewater looked brilliant at times in relief. The Cardinals could've had 31 points had a fantastic throw by Bridgewater not been dropped. This is ugly because Kentucky's roster is entirely of Joker Phillips making. He's had since the beginning of the Brooks regime to stock the cupboard. Strong has better players at the skill positions and he's been in Kentucky for only a quarter of the time as Joker. This is horrifically bad.

    No fight. The Cardinals had all the energy and emotion on the field. Kentucky took the field with no spark and played entitled, as if they expected the game to be handed to them. It's been rumored that the players do not respect Joker and they do not care for him or the decisions he's made in building his staff and on whom takes the field. Originally I dismissed this all as rumor, but after last night I feel this may be the case. No fire, no passion, and consequently they lost nearly every hat on a hat situation. This has to get corrected. Right now.

    fylm

  • A good summary of the game Jeff. As a long time Styx fan I appreciate the fact that you mentioned the band is embarrassed to have recorded that song. They should have booted Dennis DeYoung from the band immediately after the end of the Paradise Theater tour!

    bruce122767

  • bruce122767 said...

    A good summary of the game Jeff. As a long time Styx fan I appreciate the fact that you mentioned the band is embarrassed to have recorded that song. They should have booted Dennis DeYoung from the band immediately after the end of the Paradise Theater tour!

    Their Behind The Music was hilarious. Tommy Shaw said something like "I was singing Renegade... now I'm singing about ROBOTS???"

    signature image

    E-mail: JDRUM@247SPORTS.COM Follow me on Twitter: http://twitter.com/#!/JDrumUK

    Jeff Drummond

  • Pretty good recap.

    The main thing I would take issue with is this:

    "A large group of high school players from across the state and beyond were on hand at Commonwealth Stadium Saturday, plus a national TV audience on ESPNU."

    ESPNU might be broadcasted from coast to coast and border to border, but there were some good games on last night including OU-FSU, SC-Navy, The U and THE Ohio State University. The numbers are still being tallied, but the overnight numbers indicate 16 sets outside of the Commonwealth were tuned into the pillow fight. Definitely good news for the Cats.

    olblue

  • I still can't get over UL's youth taking it to UK's "veterans". UL's impact players on D were all 1st or second year players that Strong recruited. BJ Butler (true soph), Brandon Dunn (true soph), BJ Dubose (true frosh), Jamon Brown (true frosh). Looks to me like Clint Hurtt can coach equally as well as recruit. His dline punched UK in the mouth all night.

    MinterWonderlnd

  • Good write-up, Jeff. I thought that "run Morgan, run" designed plays were about as ugly as one can imagine. They were so ugly that I'm not sure I can stand to see them called more than once next week.

    ShockeyFork

  • It seems like the OL lost it's mojo and never found it after the BBVA bowl game. Amazing what one game can do to a player's psyche. Hopefully, they can find it quickly.

    dustarm20

  • It is not just the OL. If you watch the game and pay attention you will see a lot of mistakes. The ball is not going where the play is designed too often. There are not a lot of plays where the OL is just blown up. I would like to watch this tape with Jeff sometime.

    On another note, how did our special team's coach expect to successfully block 4 guys who consistently got to our second level with only 3 blockers on punts? Another one, how did we expect to defend UL when they split 3 receivers grouped together wide with only two DB's? That happened a few times and UL converted. I was amazed they didn't score. These are just bad coaching mistakes. If I can see it from the stands the guys in the press box can. I just don't see consistent attention to detail and discipline. Some guys are playing hard and some are just loafing. Finally, do we get anything at all out of the FB position? I hear all the crowing about the new guy but I never see him make a good block especially at the second level where we need him. He doesn't run the ball or catch passes. I think we need to put this on the shelf and split someone into the slot just to get people out of the box and give us another option in the passing game. I honestly think it will help our running game too.

    zcats

  • zcats, did we not watch the same game? The UL defense blew our line up all night long and many times come through with multiple people untouched.

    signature image

    Stoopified!

    cobbycobb

  • dustarm20 said...

    It seems like the OL lost it's mojo and never found it after the BBVA bowl game. Amazing what one game can do to a player's psyche. Hopefully, they can find it quickly.

    Makes you wonder. I know Pitt had way more talent than the record indicated, but hard to believe they were that much better than some of the SEC lines UK had faced.

    signature image

    E-mail: JDRUM@247SPORTS.COM Follow me on Twitter: http://twitter.com/#!/JDrumUK

    Jeff Drummond

  • cobbycobb said...

    zcats, did we not watch the same game? The UL defense blew our line up all night long and many times come through with multiple people untouched.

    I'm with you. The o line was terrible. They were too bad to let us properly evaluate any other position groups, although both WR fumbles really hurt us. 6 sacks, 14 TFLs, their guys lived in our backfield. And that's against UL, not LSU.

    BigTyrone

  • Rough game to stomach for The Big Blue Nation.

    focust1

  • I never said the OL was good but it is just incorrect to lay all the blame at their feet. You are not going to keep the DL out all day. The entire offense was disorganized and bad. The UL game was not like the Pitt game where we were over matched at the point of attack. Like it or not QB and receiver play has a big impact on how you see the OL and there were a lot of mistakes by those positions. Look at the tape.

    zcats

  • zcats said...

    I never said the OL was good but it is just incorrect to lay all the blame at their feet. You are not going to keep the DL out all day. The entire offense was disorganized and bad. The UL game was not like the Pitt game where we were over matched at the point of attack. Like it or not QB and receiver play has a big impact on how you see the OL and there were a lot of mistakes by those positions. Look at the tape.

    I don't need to watch a tape to see that the OL has been manhandled in just about every quarter of play this year. I'm not laying all of the blame at their feet, just the majority of it. Having played on the offensive line, I can tell you that when you're not doing your job, the offense is going to spin it's wheels.

    JDHoss

  • JDHoss said...

    I don't need to watch a tape to see that the OL has been manhandled in just about every quarter of play this year. I'm not laying all of the blame at their feet, just the majority of it. Having played on the offensive line, I can tell you that when you're not doing your job, the offense is going to spin it's wheels.

    you can't explain it to him he hates Newton(not that i'm his biggest fan either). so he refuses to see any progress from him. plain and simple the OL has been terrible for awhile.

    nbtoppers2

  • I don't hate Newton. I would like him to be great. I want the team to be great. If you don't need to see the tape to see how the plays broke down then you are much better at analyzing football than I am. Line blocking especially on the sweeps was bad and part of it was because guys like Hines have little lateral mobility due to a bad wheel. Warford and Hines were two of the best OG's in the SEC last year. Smith is on the Rimington watch list. Burden had off season shoulder surgery and Miller is a true freshman playing because Murphey is out. The OL didn't forget how to play. They are banged up. The same guys maned the line for the 3rd best offense in the SEC last year.

    If you played OL then you know that the skill guys can help or hurt line play by getting the ball where it is supposed to go on time. Receivers can catch and block and get out of the way when they are not in the play. Backs, including the QB can may everyone look like a fool. There were at least two screens where the OL released the pressure and on one the back blocked instead of looking to receive the ball and on the other the QB couldn't get his head up to hit the receiver. The plays looked like the line caved unless you watch it carefully. No one really played well enough to win that game. It was not just the OL. That is all I am saying. Summers was a man and took responsibility but he was not happy because it is not all his guys' fault that the O sucks.

    zcats

  • dustarm20 said...

    It seems like the OL lost it's mojo and never found it after the BBVA bowl game. Amazing what one game can do to a player's psyche. Hopefully, they can find it quickly.

    From re-watching the first three games it seems to me Lanefski and Warford have played OK. The real disappointments as far as I can tell have been Burden, Hines, and to a lesser degree Murphy (only because of the injury that held him out of the last two games). Darrian Miller has looked like a freshman, but there is definitely talent there.

    KSt