-
Chris Fisher
- 5 stars Rating: 94
3198 votes total - (17029)
- 33 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
Jeff Drummond
- 5 stars Rating: 91
960 votes total - Jeff Drummond
- (16232)
- 33 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
Jeff Drummond
- 5 stars Rating: 91
960 votes total - Jeff Drummond
- (16232)
- 33 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
hoptownukfan
- 3 stars Rating: 56
1137 votes total - (4130)
- 33 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 3 stars
-
CampbellSoup07
- 5 stars Rating: 95
46 votes total - Andrew Campbell
- (227)
- 18 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
hoptownukfan
- 3 stars Rating: 56
1137 votes total - (4130)
- 33 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 3 stars
-
Chris Fisher
- 5 stars Rating: 94
3198 votes total - (17029)
- 33 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
Chris Fisher
- 5 stars Rating: 94
3198 votes total - (17029)
- 33 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
Chris Fisher said...
Knowing what we know about UK's depth or lack thereof, I think Cal not wanting Harrell speaks even more to the fact that Harrell isn't an impact-type player.
1 - Ryan Harrow/Julius Mays
2 - Archie Goodwin/Julius Mays
3 - Alex Poythress/Jon Hood
4 - Kyle Wiltjer/Willie Cauley
5 - Nerlens Noel/Willie Cauley
The rotation was pretty much set. Not a huge loss IMO.
-
Chris Fisher
- 5 stars Rating: 94
3198 votes total - (17029)
- 33 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
Chris Fisher
- 5 stars Rating: 94
3198 votes total - (17029)
- 33 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars









Think we have our answer on Harrell