Online Now 389

The House of Blue

The home for all discussion on UK athletics

On this Board 199
Record: 3046 (4/11/2012)

Online now 395
Record: 6210 (3/13/2012)

Boards ▾

The House of Blue

The home for all discussion on UK athletics

The Paddock

The place to discuss general topics outside of Kentucky

UK Ticket Exchange

Buy, sell or swap tickets

Reply

Updated Bracketology - 2/27 WOW

  • Derek said...

    I appreciate that mindset, and most of that comes from the sheer-unbeatable nature of this UK team right now. We don't really have to fear anyone because, as you said, there's only one MAYBE two teams in the whole country who can contend with us if we are playing at a high level.

    But with that being said, I think the bigger point is not whether we think K-St can beat us, but whether we think they are the toughest of the 8/9 seeds. Right now, I think they probably are. Or at least, they have enough talent to make things interesting. The other possibilities are California and UVA, but I think K-St probably has more ability at their peak than either of those two.

    So the bigger issue is who has the "toughest" lower seeds in their bracket. I think if you compare 2-9 in each round, the current ATL bracket is by far the toughest.

    Which line would you rather see:

    2-UNC, 3- Baylor, 4-Louisville, 5-Wichita St, 6-Murray St, 7-San Diego St, 8-Purdue, 9-K. St

    2-Duke, 3-Michigan, 4-Indiana, 5-UNLV, 6-Vandy, 7-Gonzaga, 8-Virginia, 9-St. Louis

    Is that really even a comparison? lol

    8) and 9) seeds tend to be talented teams that are fatally flawed.

    Think about how scary that Wake Forest/Texas 8/9 matchup was in 2010? At one point in the season, Texas was No. 1 in the country.

    Not only did Wake beat Texas, UK blasted Wake by 30.

    This post was edited by Chris Fisher on 2/28/2012 at 11:27 AM

    signature image

    Chris Fisher