-
cobbycobb said...
Local papers rarely ever cover the smaller sports and most students ignore them too.
If a university has a department that isn't making enough revenue then yes they should be cut too. Good business says you don't keep dead weight, non performing departments or people.
QueenLizzysWild ●
- 5 stars Rating: 90
50 votes total - (1404)
- 33 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
QueenLizzysWildcat said...
The problem with your statement (in my eyes) is that this is a university, not a business, and it's main aim shouldn't be to make a profit, it should be to educate people. It's short sighted to say the astronomy department isn't making a profit, lets cut it, what about what those graduates go on to do and achieve in the future because of their education at UK?
-
cobbycobb said...
I disagree with the notion that a university shouldn't be about making money... We all know that's a falacy otherwise schools wouldn't force you to get x number of stupid credits that have zero to do with your degree and instead is a mere means to bring in more revenue and fatten the profs and admins pockets.
-
JamesPennington
- 4 stars Rating: 80
76 votes total - James Pennington
- (990)
- 28 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 4 stars
-
JamesPennington said...
In my opinion, it's short-sighted to argue in favor of cutting smaller-revenue sports than football and men's basketball. The NCAA's purpose (whether or not it's their first priority is another argument altogether, though I don't think any of us would argue on that) is to educate and to provide student-athletes with an opportunity to learn and to earn an education at a place that maybe they wouldn't have ended up otherwise. College sports like soccer and tennis enrich these students' lives because, who's to say they would have been able to go to college at all if not for the opportunity athletics afforded them? Just because a kid won't go professional in that sport, play for the national team someday or even make his or her university a boatload of money in the short-term doesn't mean it's not a valuable and worthwhile venture.
I've worked as a sports writer for five years now (three years as a student reporter at the Kentucky Kernel, which included one summer internship at the Herald-Leader, and two years here at TCP). In that time, I've written at least one story about 16 of UK's 22 varsity sports. I've covered NCAA tournaments (or bowl games, in football's case) for seven of them. These programs are successful because they're winning on the field but they're also bringing bright young minds to the University that, in all likelihood, would have ended up elsewhere otherwise.
Also: To say there is no interest in those sports is wrong. Interest in many of those sports is very high. If you say it isn't, you have not been around them. They may not earn as much money but interest is high.
It also must be clarified that sports other than football and basketball do not get full scholarships for every athlete. Men's basketball gets 13 scholarships, women's gets 15 and football gets 85.
Do you know how many men's soccer gets? 9.9. That's not a typo. Nine-point-nine scholarships. Women's soccer gets 12. Baseball gets 11.7 scholarships. Women's swimming and diving gets 8.1. Men's tennis gets 4.5. It's up to the coaches in those sports to figure out how to dole out partial scholarships among all of their athletes. I was talking to somebody at UK tonight about this very subject (oddly enough it was an unrelated conversation). Not a single baseball player in recent memory has gotten a 100-percent scholarship. James Paxton got 90 or 95% one year, and that's the closest anyone's been. Not even Alex Meyer, who was just drafted 22nd overall in the MLB draft as a junior.
So before you pass blind judgments about how many non-football athletes are being coddled by football money, at least do your homework.
It saddens me to see Maryland go down this road. This was all unfolding around this time last year with Cal and its baseball and softball programs. Alumni stepped up and donated enough money so Cal didn't shut down those two teams. It'd be great to see that happen in Maryland's case, but I'm not sure if they have as many high-profile alumni as Cal happened to have not just from its general alumni base but also from its baseball and softball teams.
This post was edited by OptimusBlue5716 on 11/24/2011 at 7:43 PM
OptimusBlue5716
- 4 stars Rating: 72
91 votes total - (537)
- 33 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 4 stars
-
JamesPennington
- 4 stars Rating: 80
76 votes total - James Pennington
- (990)
- 28 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 4 stars
-
OptimusBlue5716
- 4 stars Rating: 72
91 votes total - (537)
- 33 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 4 stars


WoW. Maryland cuts 8 varsity sports to further fund football.