-
CarlLexington
- 3 stars Rating: 50
397 votes total - (3428)
- 25 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 3 stars
-
Warmother51
- 5 stars Rating: 94
311 votes total - Eric Fulks
- (7704)
- 22 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
Warmother51 said...
All it would have took was one person to be carrying and to have pulled and killed this guy. Unfortunately the law abiding citizens werent the ones with the guns. Take guns away and the only ones who have them are the criminals. Do not support a business if it does not support your ability to carry.
-
Warmother51 said...
All it would have took was one person to be carrying and to have pulled and killed this guy. Unfortunately the law abiding citizens werent the ones with the guns. Take guns away and the only ones who have them are the criminals. Do not support a business if it does not support your ability to carry.
-
Warmother51 said...
All it would have took was one person to be carrying and to have pulled and killed this guy. Unfortunately the law abiding citizens werent the ones with the guns. Take guns away and the only ones who have them are the criminals. Do not support a business if it does not support your ability to carry.
CarlLexington
- 3 stars Rating: 50
397 votes total - (3428)
- 25 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 3 stars
-
CarlLexington said...
That is just BS NRA speak. It's ridiculous. A theatre full of people shooting would have caused more deaths than we already have. The one person with a gun would have been the first shot. The guy had armor and the movie-goer wouldn't have. But you don't have to worry. The good guys don't have the balls to stand up to the bad guys(NRA).
-
CarlLexington said...
That is just BS NRA speak. It's ridiculous. A theatre full of people shooting would have caused more deaths than we already have. The one person with a gun would have been the first shot. The guy had armor and the movie-goer wouldn't have. But you don't have to worry. The good guys don't have the balls to stand up to the bad guys(NRA).
hoptownukfan
- 3 stars Rating: 56
1137 votes total - (4130)
- 33 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 3 stars
-
hoptownukfan said...
What kind of gun control would have prevented this?
This is what is so curious to me. Frankly, I don't see a need for AR-15's. I don't see a need to be able to buy ak=47's. But in reality. The kid did his damage with a deer rifle. You won't find many people at all who want to see everyday deer rifles banned.
-
Warmother51 said...
All it would have took was one person to be carrying and to have pulled and killed this guy. Unfortunately the law abiding citizens werent the ones with the guns. Take guns away and the only ones who have them are the criminals. Do not support a business if it does not support your ability to carry.
-
dj-ky-cat said...
You guys with military experience ought to know more than anybody that this is a maybe, not a certainty. A guy with a pistol going up a guy with a semi-auto in full body armour--the pistol is gonna win what, one in 5 times. Factor in the guy with the pistol is sitting in the dark, surprised, maybe tired, probably had a few drinks by midnight on a Friday, could be with his wife or girlfriend. The scenario is just not that likely.
Yet it will be used to defray the idea that there should be some logical controls on military-grade weapons in the hands of random citizens.
CarlLexington
- 3 stars Rating: 50
397 votes total - (3428)
- 25 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 3 stars
-
dj-ky-cat said...
Show me where it says we have the right to anything more powerful than a musket--which is what "arms" consisted of back then.
There is a line. We all agree there should be one, I think. You don't want your neighbor to have a plutonium bomb. You don't want him to have a tank. On the other hand, most of us don't mind for our neighbor to have a pistol or hunting rifle or a shotgun. There's a line drawn between and there's a legitimate argument as to which side a semi-automatic assualt rifle falls on.
This post was edited by cobbycobb on 7/23/2012 at 12:07 PM
-
mrhotdice said...
The Dove speaks and his name is Carl.
I go with Archie Bunker's idea from All In the Family.
When asked his opinion on gun control on planes his suggestion was the airlines should just "pass out the pistols when you board" that way everyone is packing.

CarlLexington
- 3 stars Rating: 50
397 votes total - (3428)
- 25 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 3 stars
-
hoptownukfan said...
What kind of gun control would have prevented this?
This is what is so curious to me. Frankly, I don't see a need for AR-15's. I don't see a need to be able to buy ak=47's. But in reality. The kid did his damage with a deer rifle. You won't find many people at all who want to see everyday deer rifles banned.
No kind of 24 hour waiting period, gun ban, etc... would have stopped this. he had a clean record, actually went through waiting periods etc.
The only way this doesn't happen is if this kid was never born.
CarlLexington
- 3 stars Rating: 50
397 votes total - (3428)
- 25 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 3 stars
-
CarlLexington
- 3 stars Rating: 50
397 votes total - (3428)
- 25 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 3 stars
-
CarlLexington said...
I know I'm on the right side when you're on the other. And I haven't even responded to cobbs nonsense yet. He's having it out with DJ. So I think you mean DJ lost again, which he hasn't. He's doing a great job of checking cobbs NRA company line childish crap so I haven't needed to respond to it.
-
CarlLexington said...
I know I'm on the right side when you're on the other. And I haven't even responded to cobbs nonsense yet. He's having it out with DJ. So I think you mean DJ lost again, which he hasn't. He's doing a great job of checking cobbs NRA company line childish crap so I haven't needed to respond to it.
This post was edited by JawJacker on 7/23/2012 at 12:45 PM










Century 16 Theater in Aurora, CO... Lawsuit POLL