Online Now 408

The Paddock

The place to discuss general topics outside of Kentucky

On this Board 26
Record: 470 (10/27/2012)

Online now 374
Record: 6210 (3/13/2012)

Boards ▾

The House of Blue

The home for all discussion on UK athletics

The Paddock

The place to discuss general topics outside of Kentucky

UK Ticket Exchange

Buy, sell or swap tickets

Reply

Dems/Repubs, Liberal/Conservative?

  • BigTyrone said...

    Personal liberty goes above all else. Freedom of speech, freedom to bear arms, freedom to assemble.

    Don't go to war unless it's defensive. The rest of the world constantly fucks with us because we constantly fuck with the rest of the world. We could cut our defense spending by 75% and still have twice the military power of the next several largest countries combined. There are your lower taxes. Promote the 2nd Amendment, encourage every household to be armed. No one's going to invade us. If they want to try, bring it on, mother fuckers!

    I'm fine with GOP desires to drastically cut welfare. I would at the same time drastically increase minimum wage. Everyone who works full time should be able to afford a halfway decent, safe place to live as well as medical care.

    End the War on Drugs. I'm not talking about legalizing PCP and crack. People are going to drink, and people are going to smoke weed. Without instituting draconian policies that severely erode the personal freedom of everyone, that's not going to change. The US has more people in prison per capita than any country in the world. A majority are in for non-violent drug offenses. This is NOT the land of the free right now. It's just not, there's absolutely no reasonable argument otherwise.

    To improve the current financial situation, put lawmakers on the same playing field as the rest of us. Priority one is eliminating corruption. Double the salary (seriously) of Congress, the House and the rest of the executive branch. Eliminate lobbyists completely. Eliminate corporate donations to campaigns completely. Sitting lawmakers must sell all private investments for the duration of their terms, and have their portfolios tied directly to the performance of the economy. Pass a law that states any sitting Senator or Representative is not eligible for re-election if there's not a balanced budget. If the country doesn't prosper, neither do the lawmakers. No more backroom deals which will make their retirement portfolio explode with money.

    Enforce harsh tax penalties to US companies that outsource jobs to other countries. Tax (highly) imported goods. This will make t-shirts from China comparable cost-wise to US t-shirts, which are of a higher quality. This will encourage people to buy domestic, stimulating the economy.

    Make it easy for young people to get ahead education-wise. The US is falling behind.

    Completely reform our totally fucked up food culture in the US. We've dropped down to the 40s in life expectancy, I think 42nd internationally. Stop providing tax breaks or credits for any food producers who doesn't turn out food that's healthy. If you want to keep eating eight Big Macs a day, popping Lipitor, and have a heart attack in your late 40s, go for it. But get the twisted US Agricultural system off of welfare so the rest of us don't have to pay for it.

    Related to that last point, the USDA has two important tasks. One is to promote a healthy diet. The other is to promote food (mostly from megafarms) that is given corporate welfare and government subsidies. Get rid of all USDA responsibilities related to anything other than promoting a healthy diet and keeping the food supply safe.

    Awesome post ... +1(000,000,000)

    Welcome back BigT cheers

    signature image signature image

    JawJacker

  • What would BIgtyrone get us?

    Inflation at an outrageous rate (incrasing minimum wage and taxing outsourcing)

    I actually agree with you about the food issue. I'd also submit that people who receive food stamps can't buy gripos and soda with food stamps. Only healthy foods.

    The poorer you are the more likely you are to be obese and have chronic ilness. If you are poor the government pays for your healthcare. If you are poor, the government buys your food. So what should we do? If you are on food stamps, you have to eat healthy.

    hoptownukfan

  • Pot should be legal. So should prostitution.

    signature image

    CarlLexington

  • hoptownukfan said...

    What would BIgtyrone get us?

    Inflation at an outrageous rate (incrasing minimum wage and taxing outsourcing)

    A middle class that doesn't exist anymore and an upper class that keeps job here instead of giving them to other countries that use children and pay them slave wages for profit?

    This post was edited by CarlLexington on 9/13/2012 at 11:20 AM

    signature image

    CarlLexington

  • CarlLexington said...

    A middle class that doesn't exist anymore and an upper class that keeps job here instead of giving them to other countries that use children and pay them slave wages for profit?

    That's an oversimplified view of world economics and i suspect you know that. Do we want countries to place huge tarrifs on the products we ship overseas?

    hoptownukfan

  • CarlLexington said...

    Pot should be legal. So should prostitution.

    Pot definitely should be legal but if wouldn't do any good if Big Pharm got a hold of it. Its more safe and effective as a pain killer and Anti Depressant than anything they've ever produced. Oh so is vagina.

    tWhit

  • tWhit said...

    Oh so is vagina.

    I've found hand to be an effective generic substitute as well.

    stillDA23

  • hoptownukfan said...

    That's an oversimplified view of world economics and i suspect you know that. Do we want countries to place huge tarrifs on the products we ship overseas?

    It's not oversimplified. It's just not that complicated. Does China have huge tarrifs? What's wrong with levelling the playing field? Employees make a company run. Why should they be paid a wage they literally can't live on without state assistance while the owner lives in luxury? This country is becoming an Oligarchy.

    signature image

    CarlLexington

  • stillDA23 said...

    I've found hand to be an effective generic substitute as well.

    And liver thawed in the microwave. It's a joke!!! An old Dice Clay joke to be exact lol

    This post was edited by CarlLexington on 9/13/2012 at 11:37 AM

    signature image

    CarlLexington

  • tWhit said...

    Pot definitely should be legal but if wouldn't do any good if Big Pharm got a hold of it. Its more safe and effective as a pain killer and Anti Depressant than anything they've ever produced. Oh so is vagina.

    I don't think big pharm would be involved. I mean they aren't in cali and all the other states that have legalized medicinal marijuana. It also helps with appetite for those on chemo or any other reason they have no appetite. Also good for glaucoma. A recent big study said that not only does marijuana not hurt you but that it actually helps lung capacity. They figure it's because of all the holding in of the smoke that strengthen the lungs. Not a joke.

    signature image

    CarlLexington

  • CarlLexington said...

    I don't think big pharm would be involved. I mean they aren't in cali and all the other states that have legalized medicinal marijuana. It also helps with appetite for those on chemo or any other reason they have no appetite. Also good for glaucoma. A recent big study said that not only does marijuana not hurt you but that it actually helps lung capacity. They figure it's because of all the holding in of the smoke that strengthen the lungs. Not a joke.

    They haven't yet but if it goes country wide they could. All I'm saying is make sure they can't. Let small businesses and farmer take the lead. Lots of different products you can derive from Pot. I know it helps tremendously ease the pain of burns. You could come up with an unlimited amount of uses and products that could help people. Glaucoma and Appetite are a few of the obvious ones. If you look it up its amazing what all it does. New studies are even showing it can help prevent cancer in theory. Something about canabainioid receptors.

    tWhit

  • CarlLexington said...

    It's not oversimplified. It's just not that complicated. Does China have huge tarrifs? What's wrong with levelling the playing field? Employees make a company run. Why should they be paid a wage they literally can't live on without state assistance while the owner lives in luxury? This country is becoming an Oligarchy.

    china doesn't have high tarrifs on our exports, namely our agriculture products.

    And yes, you are oversimplifying. Our economy is transforming.

    The best economies in the world have the most educated people in the world. In the 50's and 60's our economy was based on manufacturing and the jobs were based on the strength of your back and not on the ability to think.

    Now we've got an economy in which the educated are thriving and the undeducated are suffering. Unemployment for people with a college degree is less than 4%. Those with a 2 year degree or technical degree less than 6%. Those with no post high school training 11% and those with no high school diploma 15%+.

    It's not about trade policy it's about workforce. Our government (republicans and democrats) have created an education system that has no accountability. We consider teachers as entitled employees and refuse to hold them accountable for the results they produce. We allow kids to drop out of school at age 16. When that happens they become a drag on our economy.

    Our issue in america isn't a trade issue (there are some nuances about currency manipulatino) it's about having a lazy workforce that has not adjusted to the "mind" economy.

    Ask top HR managers. They'll tell you in a heart beat that they can't find good workers. They can find "people" but they can't find people who can think or who can pass a drug test.

    hoptownukfan

  • hoptownukfan said...

    I'd also submit that people who receive food stamps can't buy gripos and soda with food stamps. Only healthy foods.

    If you are poor, the government buys your food. So what should we do? If you are on food stamps, you have to eat healthy.

    Sounds good, but just not realistic. "Health Food Only" stamps cannot guarantee better health for anyone... poor or otherwise. There are many things that ultimately effects one's health. Though it may be a well intended, compassionate idea... it simply wouldn't work. Instead, it would be just another heavily regulated, big government subsidy at the tax payers expense... and what we would have with our nations poor, is the same obesity and unhealthy eating habits as we do now. The only difference (with your idea) is... now their stamps are worth even MORE money, making them that much easier to sell in exchange for cash. It's a common practice now, so after big nanny improves their worth, giving them a more attractive deal to offer others...why would they NOT sell them?

    I can agree with you on a lot of things hop (politically)... the same as I may disagree with BigT on a lot of things (politically). However, we have to be realistic.... and many things in BigT's post are more realistic. I may not agree with it all, but our government better serves it's people, when they focus on the most important issues (of the day) and work together... they must find common ground, agree on common sense solutions and sign compromising legislation into law, which represents the will of like-minded, common sense American citizens.... and STOP pandering to the extreme right/left, the special interests groups and all foreign nations who only use our gullible asses for our money.

    I know many people in the middle, both on the left and right, who are normal everyday folks... who could agree on most everything in BigT's post (among many other things). Being a Conservative/Libertarian, as well as, a Christian... even "I" can agree to most of his ideas. The bottom line is... as long as we keep playing this "Political Power" game of tug-a-war, we will never get anywhere as a nation... and we will ALL lose in the end.

    It's time to turn our government into a "Reality Show" and start voting "Real People" into office. Pipe Dream? Maybe. shrug

    This post has been edited 3 times, most recently by JawJacker on 9/13/2012 at 12:04 PM

    signature image signature image

    JawJacker

  • JawJacker said...

    Sounds good, but just not realistic. "Health Food Only" stamps cannot guarantee better health for anyone... poor or otherwise. There are many things that ultimately effects one's health. Though it may be a well intended, compassionate idea... it simply wouldn't work. Instead, it would be just another heavily regulated, big government subsidy at the tax payers expense... and what we would have with our nations poor, is the same obesity and unhealthy eating habits as we do now. The only difference (with your idea) is... now their stamps are worth even MORE money, making them that much easier to sell in exchange for cash. It's a common practice now, so after big nanny improves their worth, giving them a more attractive deal to offer others...why would they NOT sell them?

    I can agree with you on a lot of things hop (politically)... the same as I may disagree with BigT on a lot of things (politically). However, we have to be realistic.... and many things in BigT's post are more realistic. I may not agree with it all, but our government better serves it's people, when they focus on the most important issues (of the day) and work together... they must find common ground, agree on common sense solutions and sign compromising legislation into law, which represents the will of like-minded, common sense American citizens.... and STOP pandering to the extreme right/left, the special interests groups and all foreign nations who only use our gullible asses for our money.

    I know many people in the middle, both on the left and right, who are normal everyday folks... who could agree on most everything in BigT's post (among many other things). Being a Conservative/Libertarian, as well as, a Christian... even "I" can agree to most of his ideas. The bottom line is... as long as we keep playing this "Political Power" game of tug-a-war, we will never get anywhere as a nation... and we will ALL lose in the end. It's time to turn our government into a "Reality Show".

    I agree, if you buy your own food, government should not be involved in the process. But if I'm buying your food and healthcare for you, I should sure as hell do everything in my power to make sure you eat healthy so I don't have to pay treat you for diabities, heart disease etc... Chronic illnesses like the one's i just listed are preventable 90% of the time with a healthy diet.

    90% of the food people eat who are on foodstamps come from foodstamps. Go in the grocery store at the first of the month and notice all the folks swiping the american flag card. Notice what's in their shopping carts. It's not wheat bread, lean meat and veggies.

    It's bags of chips, soda, white bread and high fat meats.

    We regulate what can be purchased with wic. We can do the same with foodstamps.

    In terms of why people like Carl on the far left and others on the far right control our government? It's simple. Closed primaries. Independent thinkers like you and i get shut out of the candidate selection process. We are not valuable until the general election once the exteremists have been chosen by the extremists. See Rand Paul as the prime example. (no offense if you like him) Trey Grayson was about as "down the middle" as they come and would have destroyed Jack Conway yet the closed primary system gave us Paul because independents and conservative democrats couldn't cross over and vote Grayson.

    I agree, we need to give independent thinkers a voice in our country. Personally, that's why I like Romney. His record proves that he's pragmatic. He was highly effective in working with an 85% democrat legislature in Mass. He has common sense. While not as articulate as Clinton, they are both pragmatists.

    This post has been edited 2 times, most recently by hoptownukfan on 9/13/2012 at 12:09 PM

    hoptownukfan

  • hoptownukfan said...

    I agree, if you buy your own food, government should not be involved in the process. But if I'm buying your food and healthcare for you, I should sure as hell do everything in my power to make sure you eat healthy so I don't have to pay treat you for diabities, heart disease etc... Chronic illnesses like the one's i just listed are preventable 90% of the time with a healthy diet.

    90% of the food people eat who are on foodstamps come from foodstamps. Go in the grocery store at the first of the month and notice all the folks swiping the american flag card. Notice what's in their shopping carts. It's not wheat bread, lean meat and veggies.

    It's bags of chips, soda, white bread and high fat meats.

    We regulate what can be purchased with wic. We can do the same with foodstamps.

    In terms of why people like Carl on the far left and others on the far right control our government? It's simple. Closed primaries. Independent thinkers like you and i get shut out of the candidate selection process. We are not valuable until the general election once the exteremists have been chosen by the extremists. See Rand Paul as the prime example. (no offense if you like him) Trey Grayson was about as "down the middle" as they come and would have destroyed Jack Conway yet the closed primary system gave us Paul because independents and conservative democrats couldn't cross over and vote Grayson.

    I agree, we need to give independent thinkers a voice in our country. Personally, that's why I like Romney. His record proves that he's pragmatic. He was highly effective in working with an 85% democrat legislature in Mass. He has common sense. While not as articulate as Clinton, they are both pragmatists.

    Half the time they are using food stamps at gas stations now. We all know they sell nothing healthy there. Unless people are buying almonds which they are not. I see this stuff probably more than anybody on this board because I work at a place and supervise some really overweight people. They literally won't stop drinking soda to help diabetes. They come to work and they are so overweight that they have to elevate their feet to stop the swelling. Its so bad that the insurance company at work had to implement a clause that they will not pay for Gastric Bypass or Lap Band surgery. Most of these people would literally rather go under the knife than quit drinking sodas. Its sad, I try to tell them all the time that if you won't do it for yourself then do it for your kids. Almost everybody has diabetes and if they don't their husband or child has diabetes. Its crazy. Not only that but I constantly hear about somebody who has cancer in this mix of people. Every damn day. But JJ is right a lot of the time now people are selling these food stamp cards for cash. I've even seen this in my Wifes family. She's got a sister with 3 kids by 3 different dudes none of which support their child. She actually has a decent job but still gets food stamps. She's made numerous mistakes and instead of having to live with them and find a way to live off what she makes the government bails her out for having to take any responsibility for herself and her family.

    As a side note has anybody heard the commercials now for food stamps? Advertising the fact that its not a hard process to get food stamps. And I don't mind people who are going through school who get food stamps. I'm not saying that everybody abuses the fact that they can get them. But it just seems like a ploy by the government to control people.

    This post was edited by tWhit on 9/13/2012 at 12:28 PM

    tWhit

  • hoptownukfan said...

    I agree, if you buy your own food, government should not be involved in the process. But if I'm buying your food and healthcare for you, I should sure as hell do everything in my power to make sure you eat healthy so I don't have to pay treat you for diabities, heart disease etc... Chronic illnesses like the one's i just listed are preventable 90% of the time with a healthy diet.

    90% of the food people eat who are on foodstamps come from foodstamps. Go in the grocery store at the first of the month and notice all the folks swiping the american flag card. Notice what's in their shopping carts. It's not wheat bread, lean meat and veggies.

    It's bags of chips, soda, white bread and high fat meats.

    We regulate what can be purchased with wic. We can do the same with foodstamps.

    In terms of why people like Carl on the far left and others on the far right control our government? It's simple. Closed primaries. Independent thinkers like you and i get shut out of the candidate selection process. We are not valuable until the general election once the exteremists have been chosen by the extremists. See Rand Paul as the prime example. (no offense if you like him) Trey Grayson was about as "down the middle" as they come and would have destroyed Jack Conway yet the closed primary system gave us Paul because independents and conservative democrats couldn't cross over and vote Grayson.

    I agree, we need to give independent thinkers a voice in our country. Personally, that's why I like Romney. His record proves that he's pragmatic. He was highly effective in working with an 85% democrat legislature in Mass. He has common sense. While not as articulate as Clinton, they are both pragmatists.

    All valid points. We just have to agree to disagree on health food stamps, because it would never work as you and I would hope for. We would have more people finding ways to mooch off the tax payers. We would have more people on food stamps eating better than those of us who work to feed our own family... just like many of them now have nicer cars, fancier cell phones and bigger HD flat screens in their their nicer homes. I would much rather have a plan that would motivate people to get off of food stamps... not encourage it. We will always have the legitimate and deserving needy, who will require such assistance... but we need to promote a prosperous economy to encourage people to be more independent and willing to work for a living (not to mention... self-esteem, self-pride and self-worth).

    signature image signature image

    JawJacker

  • JawJacker said...

    I would much rather have a plan that would motivate people to get off of food stamps... not encourage it. We will always have the legitimate and deserving needy, who will require such assistance... but we need to promote a prosperous economy to encourage people to be more independent and willing to work for a living (not to mention... self-esteem, self-pride and self-worth).

    THIS X a million.

    tWhit

  • tWhit said...

    As a side note has anybody heard the commercials now for food stamps? Advertising the fact that its not a hard process to get food stamps. And I don't mind people who are going through school who get food stamps. I'm not saying that everybody abuses the fact that they can get them. But it just seems like a ploy by the government to control people.

    Yes... and it's scary. People are either too ignorant or simply don't give a shit... about the fact that our current Administration is taking strategic steps to make more and more people big nanny dependents. When they go as far as to actually "promote" food stamps and explain how every day, hard working average people can achieve food stamps... then, everything that America once stood proudly for will soon be lost.

    What's even worse and more pathetic, is the fact that government is paying for these manipulating, enticing ads with OUR DAMN MONEY!!!

    This post has been edited 2 times, most recently by JawJacker on 9/13/2012 at 12:47 PM

    signature image signature image

    JawJacker

  • JawJacker said...

    All valid points. We just have to agree to disagree on health food stamps, because it would never work as you and I would hope for. We would have more people finding ways to mooch off the tax payers. We would have more people on food stamps eating better than those of us who work to feed our own family... just like many of them now have nicer cars, fancier cell phones and bigger HD flat screens in their their nicer homes. I would much rather have a plan that would motivate people to get off of food stamps... not encourage it. We will always have the legitimate and deserving needy, who will require such assistance... but we need to promote a prosperous economy to encourage people to be more independent and willing to work for a living (not to mention... self-esteem, self-pride and self-worth).

    I agree. We need to work to get folks off of foodstamps. But for those who are on them, let's not double charge the tax payer by having to pay for thei health care on chronic illnesses caused by eating crap.

    hoptownukfan

  • Carl isn't on the far left. Left, but I'm not a communist.

    signature image

    CarlLexington

  • CarlLexington said...

    Carl isn't on the far left. Left, but I'm not a communist.

    Far left = socialist to me. You seem to fit that pretty well. Extreme left = communist.

    hoptownukfan

  • hoptownukfan said...

    Far left = socialist to me. You seem to fit that pretty well. Extreme left = communist.

    Well it's according to a person's definition of Socialism. Many think anyone that thinks the government can provide a service is a socialist.

    socialism (ˈsəʊʃəˌlɪzəm)
    — n
    1.Compare capitalism an economic theory or system in which the means of production, distribution, and exchange are owned by the community collectively, usually through the state. It is characterized by production for use rather than profit, by equality of individual wealth, by the absence of competitive economic activity, and, usually, by government determination of investment, prices, and production levels.

    This definition does not describe what I'm in favor of. Competition fuels an economy. I'm not for making everyone have the same salary. I just want the rich to pay their fair share. I want those that make over 250K a year to go back to the tax rate before the Bush tax cuts. That doesn't make me a socialist. Wanting universal healthcare also does not make me a socialist. If universal healthcare makes a country socialist than every country in the industrialized world other than us are socialists. There is no such thing as one pure and true 100% system anywhere in the world. And if they were they would be the poorest. I'm not a socialist. I'm not anywhere close to one actually. I also don't believe socialism is evil either.

    signature image

    CarlLexington

  • Definition that I found that fits today's stereotype and I think that applies to folks like you is as follows. BTW, I don't think liberals or conservatives are bad people. The extremes on both sides seem insistent on thinking that anybody who disagrees with them is stupid.

    Socialism - System of social organization in which private property and the distribution of income are subject to social control; also, the political movements aimed at putting that system into practice

    hoptownukfan

  • If this conversation was in person I'd do an angry fake german thing like hitler and at the end i'd calm down and say "I'm not a socialist".

    signature image

    CarlLexington