-
BigTyrone said...
Personal liberty goes above all else. Freedom of speech, freedom to bear arms, freedom to assemble.
Don't go to war unless it's defensive. The rest of the world constantly fucks with us because we constantly fuck with the rest of the world. We could cut our defense spending by 75% and still have twice the military power of the next several largest countries combined. There are your lower taxes. Promote the 2nd Amendment, encourage every household to be armed. No one's going to invade us. If they want to try, bring it on, mother fuckers!
I'm fine with GOP desires to drastically cut welfare. I would at the same time drastically increase minimum wage. Everyone who works full time should be able to afford a halfway decent, safe place to live as well as medical care.
End the War on Drugs. I'm not talking about legalizing PCP and crack. People are going to drink, and people are going to smoke weed. Without instituting draconian policies that severely erode the personal freedom of everyone, that's not going to change. The US has more people in prison per capita than any country in the world. A majority are in for non-violent drug offenses. This is NOT the land of the free right now. It's just not, there's absolutely no reasonable argument otherwise.
To improve the current financial situation, put lawmakers on the same playing field as the rest of us. Priority one is eliminating corruption. Double the salary (seriously) of Congress, the House and the rest of the executive branch. Eliminate lobbyists completely. Eliminate corporate donations to campaigns completely. Sitting lawmakers must sell all private investments for the duration of their terms, and have their portfolios tied directly to the performance of the economy. Pass a law that states any sitting Senator or Representative is not eligible for re-election if there's not a balanced budget. If the country doesn't prosper, neither do the lawmakers. No more backroom deals which will make their retirement portfolio explode with money.
Enforce harsh tax penalties to US companies that outsource jobs to other countries. Tax (highly) imported goods. This will make t-shirts from China comparable cost-wise to US t-shirts, which are of a higher quality. This will encourage people to buy domestic, stimulating the economy.
Make it easy for young people to get ahead education-wise. The US is falling behind.
Completely reform our totally fucked up food culture in the US. We've dropped down to the 40s in life expectancy, I think 42nd internationally. Stop providing tax breaks or credits for any food producers who doesn't turn out food that's healthy. If you want to keep eating eight Big Macs a day, popping Lipitor, and have a heart attack in your late 40s, go for it. But get the twisted US Agricultural system off of welfare so the rest of us don't have to pay for it.
Related to that last point, the USDA has two important tasks. One is to promote a healthy diet. The other is to promote food (mostly from megafarms) that is given corporate welfare and government subsidies. Get rid of all USDA responsibilities related to anything other than promoting a healthy diet and keeping the food supply safe.
-
hoptownukfan
- 3 stars Rating: 56
1136 votes total - (4128)
- 32 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 3 stars
-
CarlLexington
- 3 stars Rating: 50
397 votes total - (3428)
- 23 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 3 stars
-
CarlLexington
- 3 stars Rating: 50
397 votes total - (3428)
- 23 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 3 stars
-
hoptownukfan
- 3 stars Rating: 56
1136 votes total - (4128)
- 32 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 3 stars
-
CarlLexington
- 3 stars Rating: 50
397 votes total - (3428)
- 23 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 3 stars
-
CarlLexington
- 3 stars Rating: 50
397 votes total - (3428)
- 23 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 3 stars
-
CarlLexington
- 3 stars Rating: 50
397 votes total - (3428)
- 23 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 3 stars
-
CarlLexington said...
I don't think big pharm would be involved. I mean they aren't in cali and all the other states that have legalized medicinal marijuana. It also helps with appetite for those on chemo or any other reason they have no appetite. Also good for glaucoma. A recent big study said that not only does marijuana not hurt you but that it actually helps lung capacity. They figure it's because of all the holding in of the smoke that strengthen the lungs. Not a joke.
-
CarlLexington said...
It's not oversimplified. It's just not that complicated. Does China have huge tarrifs? What's wrong with levelling the playing field? Employees make a company run. Why should they be paid a wage they literally can't live on without state assistance while the owner lives in luxury? This country is becoming an Oligarchy.
hoptownukfan
- 3 stars Rating: 56
1136 votes total - (4128)
- 32 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 3 stars
-
hoptownukfan said...
I'd also submit that people who receive food stamps can't buy gripos and soda with food stamps. Only healthy foods.
If you are poor, the government buys your food. So what should we do? If you are on food stamps, you have to eat healthy.
This post has been edited 3 times, most recently by JawJacker on 9/13/2012 at 12:04 PM
-
JawJacker said...
Sounds good, but just not realistic. "Health Food Only" stamps cannot guarantee better health for anyone... poor or otherwise. There are many things that ultimately effects one's health. Though it may be a well intended, compassionate idea... it simply wouldn't work. Instead, it would be just another heavily regulated, big government subsidy at the tax payers expense... and what we would have with our nations poor, is the same obesity and unhealthy eating habits as we do now. The only difference (with your idea) is... now their stamps are worth even MORE money, making them that much easier to sell in exchange for cash. It's a common practice now, so after big nanny improves their worth, giving them a more attractive deal to offer others...why would they NOT sell them?
I can agree with you on a lot of things hop (politically)... the same as I may disagree with BigT on a lot of things (politically). However, we have to be realistic.... and many things in BigT's post are more realistic. I may not agree with it all, but our government better serves it's people, when they focus on the most important issues (of the day) and work together... they must find common ground, agree on common sense solutions and sign compromising legislation into law, which represents the will of like-minded, common sense American citizens.... and STOP pandering to the extreme right/left, the special interests groups and all foreign nations who only use our gullible asses for our money.
I know many people in the middle, both on the left and right, who are normal everyday folks... who could agree on most everything in BigT's post (among many other things). Being a Conservative/Libertarian, as well as, a Christian... even "I" can agree to most of his ideas. The bottom line is... as long as we keep playing this "Political Power" game of tug-a-war, we will never get anywhere as a nation... and we will ALL lose in the end. It's time to turn our government into a "Reality Show".
This post has been edited 2 times, most recently by hoptownukfan on 9/13/2012 at 12:09 PM
hoptownukfan
- 3 stars Rating: 56
1136 votes total - (4128)
- 32 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 3 stars
-
hoptownukfan said...
I agree, if you buy your own food, government should not be involved in the process. But if I'm buying your food and healthcare for you, I should sure as hell do everything in my power to make sure you eat healthy so I don't have to pay treat you for diabities, heart disease etc... Chronic illnesses like the one's i just listed are preventable 90% of the time with a healthy diet.
90% of the food people eat who are on foodstamps come from foodstamps. Go in the grocery store at the first of the month and notice all the folks swiping the american flag card. Notice what's in their shopping carts. It's not wheat bread, lean meat and veggies.
It's bags of chips, soda, white bread and high fat meats.
We regulate what can be purchased with wic. We can do the same with foodstamps.
In terms of why people like Carl on the far left and others on the far right control our government? It's simple. Closed primaries. Independent thinkers like you and i get shut out of the candidate selection process. We are not valuable until the general election once the exteremists have been chosen by the extremists. See Rand Paul as the prime example. (no offense if you like him) Trey Grayson was about as "down the middle" as they come and would have destroyed Jack Conway yet the closed primary system gave us Paul because independents and conservative democrats couldn't cross over and vote Grayson.
I agree, we need to give independent thinkers a voice in our country. Personally, that's why I like Romney. His record proves that he's pragmatic. He was highly effective in working with an 85% democrat legislature in Mass. He has common sense. While not as articulate as Clinton, they are both pragmatists.
This post was edited by tWhit on 9/13/2012 at 12:28 PM
-
hoptownukfan said...
I agree, if you buy your own food, government should not be involved in the process. But if I'm buying your food and healthcare for you, I should sure as hell do everything in my power to make sure you eat healthy so I don't have to pay treat you for diabities, heart disease etc... Chronic illnesses like the one's i just listed are preventable 90% of the time with a healthy diet.
90% of the food people eat who are on foodstamps come from foodstamps. Go in the grocery store at the first of the month and notice all the folks swiping the american flag card. Notice what's in their shopping carts. It's not wheat bread, lean meat and veggies.
It's bags of chips, soda, white bread and high fat meats.
We regulate what can be purchased with wic. We can do the same with foodstamps.
In terms of why people like Carl on the far left and others on the far right control our government? It's simple. Closed primaries. Independent thinkers like you and i get shut out of the candidate selection process. We are not valuable until the general election once the exteremists have been chosen by the extremists. See Rand Paul as the prime example. (no offense if you like him) Trey Grayson was about as "down the middle" as they come and would have destroyed Jack Conway yet the closed primary system gave us Paul because independents and conservative democrats couldn't cross over and vote Grayson.
I agree, we need to give independent thinkers a voice in our country. Personally, that's why I like Romney. His record proves that he's pragmatic. He was highly effective in working with an 85% democrat legislature in Mass. He has common sense. While not as articulate as Clinton, they are both pragmatists.
-
JawJacker said...
I would much rather have a plan that would motivate people to get off of food stamps... not encourage it. We will always have the legitimate and deserving needy, who will require such assistance... but we need to promote a prosperous economy to encourage people to be more independent and willing to work for a living (not to mention... self-esteem, self-pride and self-worth).
-
tWhit said...
As a side note has anybody heard the commercials now for food stamps? Advertising the fact that its not a hard process to get food stamps. And I don't mind people who are going through school who get food stamps. I'm not saying that everybody abuses the fact that they can get them. But it just seems like a ploy by the government to control people.
This post has been edited 2 times, most recently by JawJacker on 9/13/2012 at 12:47 PM
-
JawJacker said...
All valid points. We just have to agree to disagree on health food stamps, because it would never work as you and I would hope for. We would have more people finding ways to mooch off the tax payers. We would have more people on food stamps eating better than those of us who work to feed our own family... just like many of them now have nicer cars, fancier cell phones and bigger HD flat screens in their their nicer homes. I would much rather have a plan that would motivate people to get off of food stamps... not encourage it. We will always have the legitimate and deserving needy, who will require such assistance... but we need to promote a prosperous economy to encourage people to be more independent and willing to work for a living (not to mention... self-esteem, self-pride and self-worth).
hoptownukfan
- 3 stars Rating: 56
1136 votes total - (4128)
- 32 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 3 stars
-
CarlLexington
- 3 stars Rating: 50
397 votes total - (3428)
- 23 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 3 stars
-
hoptownukfan
- 3 stars Rating: 56
1136 votes total - (4128)
- 32 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 3 stars
-
CarlLexington
- 3 stars Rating: 50
397 votes total - (3428)
- 23 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 3 stars
-
hoptownukfan
- 3 stars Rating: 56
1136 votes total - (4128)
- 32 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 3 stars
-
CarlLexington
- 3 stars Rating: 50
397 votes total - (3428)
- 23 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 3 stars






Dems/Repubs, Liberal/Conservative?