-
BG631
- 5 stars Rating: 81
512 votes total - Brad G
- (6294)
- 31 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
QueenLizzysWildcat
- 5 stars Rating: 90
50 votes total - (1400)
- 32 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
BG631
- 5 stars Rating: 81
512 votes total - Brad G
- (6294)
- 31 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
CatfaninIndiana
- 5 stars Rating: 100
25 votes total - (427)
- 32 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
BG631
- 5 stars Rating: 81
512 votes total - Brad G
- (6294)
- 31 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
BG631
- 5 stars Rating: 81
512 votes total - Brad G
- (6294)
- 31 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
BG631 said...
We do need to figure out how to do the playoff shit though. . . Right now I have it set so Each division winner gets in automatically, but the seed is determined by your overall record. . .Also, 6 teams in the playoffs almost seems like too many in a 10 person league. . . What do you all think??
-
CatfaninIndiana
- 5 stars Rating: 100
25 votes total - (427)
- 32 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
tommy said...
Ok, first and foremost....get rid of the Louisville bullshit.
Second, why even bother with divisions? Divisions are usually for larger leagues anyway. Why not just have whatever number of teams we are using and the top 4 or 6 get in? I like having a larger post season. 6 teams With the top 2 getting 1st round bye weeks. JMO
Im also not a big fan of re seeding once the playoffs begin.
-
tommy said...
Ok, first and foremost....get rid of the Louisville bullshit.
Second, why even bother with divisions? Divisions are usually for larger leagues anyway. Why not just have whatever number of teams we are using and the top 4 or 6 get in? I like having a larger post season. 6 teams With the top 2 getting 1st round bye weeks. JMO
Im also not a big fan of re seeding once the playoffs begin.
BG631
- 5 stars Rating: 81
512 votes total - Brad G
- (6294)
- 31 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
BG631
- 5 stars Rating: 81
512 votes total - Brad G
- (6294)
- 31 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
BigBlueNation 7
- 5 stars Rating: 96
31 votes total - Tyler M
- (170)
- 32 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
BG631 said...
Ok, first off the Louisville thing is staying. . .
Second I don't really care about divisions one way or the other, I was just bored one day and started messing around. . . Chill the F out tommy, lol the Louisville thing is just a joke . . .
Third I like placing more value on the regular season personally, I don't feel like the guy who finishes 6th in the regular season in a 10 person league should be in contention to win the league over all. .
Fourth, I hate bye weeks
Fifth, what the hell is playoff "re-seeding"??? How would you even do that?? What would you re-seed from and to???
Again, these are all just my opinions, what ever the majority of the league wants to do we will. . . (To a certain extent, ha
) -
BG631
- 5 stars Rating: 81
512 votes total - Brad G
- (6294)
- 31 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
JawJacker said...
A joke is one thing, but to come back on here and say it's staying that way is bullshit. Maybe Brad is trying to piss a few of us off in hopes that we will back out. I don't plan on watching myself being labeled as a Louisville fan the rest of the year... especially, in a league I must "PAY" to get in. Brad, that's uncool and you know it... if you don't plan on changing it, then count me out. Some of us can start another league.
BG631
- 5 stars Rating: 81
512 votes total - Brad G
- (6294)
- 31 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
- Post a New Topic
- Back to Topics
- « Previous Topic
- Next Topic »
- Boards ▾
- Pages: 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ... | 7









Fantasy Football this year?