-
CarlLexington said...
I think it's fair to say most moderate and independent people would say the democratic convention blew the republican one away. Only the most conservative of republicans would say their convention was better and I'd bet a lot that a good % of those know the democratic convention was better but would never admit it.
-
WildcatGG24 said...
How can you have much of an honest opinion though...this was the start of your RNC thread:
"I didn't watch it. Of course. I caught snippets here and there."
Not saying you are wrong or right...just wondering how you can compare when you didnt watch one. If you are going off of polling bumps, well I wouldnt put much stock into it. Dems were going to get a bump no matter the convention performance...hell I think GWB got a large bump...back in 04
CarlLexington
- 3 stars Rating: 50
397 votes total - (3428)
- 25 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 3 stars
-
CarlLexington
- 3 stars Rating: 50
397 votes total - (3428)
- 25 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 3 stars
-
CarlLexington said...
I'm going on what I did see which was a complete joke of a convention coming from the republicans. Chris Christie acting like he's the one being nominated, not a mention of Afghanistan, Ann Romney trying to convince people she and Mitt had it really rough, the entire platform being based on a lie, and the now infamous Eastwood and the empty chair routine. By all accounts other than Fox a complete laughfest of a convention.
-
WildcatGG24 said...
Those other accounts happen to be left leaning? Sure, they are...Fox right leaning? Sure it is.
They see what they want to see and send the message of what they want people to believe whether it be true or false.
Christie was bad. Anne Romney was genuine. Michelle Obama seemed phony on her delivery to me, but I know some people loved it. Clinton did what he does, and is very popular, ran a little too long but performed good. Obama was underwhelming. Romney did better than his usual speeches, but still underwhelming. Biden was surprisingly better than Obama, his only prob was that a few times he got angry looking. Ryan wasnt memorable, but I bet his "all-american" family helps him (Obama's does as well). Sandra Fluke was a joke...
All in all, they were all FOS and these convention won't have much impact in November. They were pretty forgettable.
-
CarlLexington
- 3 stars Rating: 50
397 votes total - (3428)
- 25 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 3 stars
-
CarlLexington
- 3 stars Rating: 50
397 votes total - (3428)
- 25 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 3 stars
-
CarlLexington said...
And on a completely different note this election is far from over. I know I have talked a lot of smack. I can't resist sticking it to the righties. They deserve it so. But I'm not ready to throw dirt on Romney yet. There's a long way to go and I can't help but seeing Truman holding the "Dewey Wins" headline in my mind's eye. A long way to go.
-
WildcatGG24 said...
Not blaming Hollywood or anyone. In fact, I think it is beneficial for the Dems to produce such grand things.
I think it plays very well to the un-informed and the people who care about politics for about a week out of the year. It's smart.
This post was edited by CarlLexington on 9/20/2012 at 10:22 AM
CarlLexington
- 3 stars Rating: 50
397 votes total - (3428)
- 25 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 3 stars
-
dj-ky-cat said...
There's a ways to go, but this is shaping up to be a disaster for Republicans, which might not be a bad thing (for them) in the long run. I think it's a revelation that they can nominate a candidate that so little understands how America works and apparently has no respect for anybody south of median income, from which he will likely receive a majority of his votes.
I do not believe this speaks for the majority of Republicans. By and large, they respect the American ideals of advancement. They also, in large numbers, believe that government has some role in fostering that advancement. The question since the New Deal is how much of a role that needs to be. They do not hold grudges against people who need or needed some of that help because most of us either are those people, have had some of those people in our families, or may be even working for such a person.
EJ Dionne had this quote in his column today--it's very nicely stated from Pres. George W. Bush. Although I disagreed with Pres. Bush on many many things, this kind of thing isn't something I ever dreamed any Americans would disagree over:
"Yet this is not who we are as Americans. We have always found our better selves in sympathy and generosity, both in our lives and in our laws. ... Our national character shines in our compassion."
CarlLexington
- 3 stars Rating: 50
397 votes total - (3428)
- 25 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 3 stars
-
CarlLexington
- 3 stars Rating: 50
397 votes total - (3428)
- 25 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 3 stars
-
CarlLexington said...
I don't think they'll get the message they should. They'll see it that they need a "real" conservative running. Someone even more right than Romney. Which is the exact opposite of what they should be learning. I completely disagree that Republicans by and large respect Government having a role in the adavancment of the poor or sick or less fortunate. I think by and large they could give a shit about anyone other than themselves. If you aren't making it it's because you're lazy. You have no right to food or my tax money just because you're too lazy to work. That's by and large the republican attitude. And they believe everyone needing and receiving help is a lazy bum. They are either cruel or uninformed morons. By and large. Not all. They hammered Dubya for those statements and the few good things he did do, aid to africa and prescription drugs for seniors.
-
CarlLexington said...
It's funny you keep insulting Dems by calling us uniformed when the Right get all their information from Fox "news", rush, beck, and right wing bloggers that cater to them. Republicans think they can cut their way to a balanced budget(uninformed/stupid). Republicans think the world is 6000 years old(uniformed/stupid). Republicans think man has nothing to do with climate change(uninformed/stupid). Republicans think Obama was born in Kenya(uninformed/stupid). Providing a link showing the correlation between college graduates and party affiliation. In short, the more educated a person becomes the more left they become. Hence republicans wanting to gut education/grants so they can keep the people good and stupid sheep ripe for the propaganda of the conservative machine. Production value had nothing to do with people knowing the dems won the convention comparison. It had to do with the platforms and what each side was selling. I don't recall Clinton coming out with fire cannons and a pink floyedesque light show. He just spoke. I don't recall Michelle Obama coming from the rafters on a harnees to land on a stage where cirque du soleil was performing. She just spoke. And so on with all the speakers. The left are winning on our ideas, not production or a "liberal" media. As a matter of fact the so-called liberal media have been frustratingly easy on Mitt and Paul. They never question them on their fuzzy math or Mitt's tax evasion. They may ask but they don't follow up and demand a real answer. They never ever call Mitt out for his daily flip flops.
-
CarlLexington said...
Jaysus.
In the final sentence of his speech, Rubio told voters that he dreamed about the day when there will be more "government over more freedom," with Mitt Romney in office. He clearly meant the opposite, that Republicans want more freedom over more government.
What he really meant is more freedom for the rich and more poverty for the poor. Adore him if you want but he was far from the best speaker of either convention. He wasn't even the best of his disastrous party's convention. Here's a lil diddy on the golden child and it's from Fox "News" which is pretty shocking in and of itself.
And on a completely different note this election is far from over. I know I have talked a lot of smack. I can't resist sticking it to the righties. They deserve it so. But I'm not ready to throw dirt on Romney yet. There's a long way to go and I can't help but seeing Truman holding the "Dewey Wins" headline in my mind's eye. A long way to go.
-
ukaveman said...
It ain't over yet but Romney needs to kick it into another gear if he hopes to have a chance. I'm just amazed at the kid glove treatment der leader has gotten over the last two weeks. Amassador gets killed, make a statement and fly off to Vegas for a fundraiser. Lie about the circumstances for a week and then when the truth gets out, it all gets ignored. For crying out loud, when asked about the total debt he couldn't even answer that (hint idiot it's 16Trillion and climbing). Bottom line is I've never seen a guy get such a pass for his obvious BS and incompetence as this POS. Even Bob Woodward, who in tremendous detail documents the DBag's utter incompetence and failed leadership, and NOBODY gives it creedence. If I didn't know better I'd bet that Obama's real name is Damian Thorne the way people just circle the wagons and protect him!!!
CarlLexington
- 3 stars Rating: 50
397 votes total - (3428)
- 25 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 3 stars
- Post a New Topic
- Back to Topics
- « Previous Topic
- Next Topic »
- Boards ▾
- Pages: 1 | 2 | 3




It's over fellas