Online Now 448

The Paddock

The place to discuss general topics outside of Kentucky

On this Board 15
Record: 470 (10/27/2012)

Online now 454
Record: 6210 (3/13/2012)

Boards ▾

The House of Blue

The home for all discussion on UK athletics

The Paddock

The place to discuss general topics outside of Kentucky

UK Ticket Exchange

Buy, sell or swap tickets

Reply

It's over fellas

  • goldenbearcatz said...

    Keep it up with that kool-aid

    What Koolaid?

    I said people see what they want to see. I didnt give any opinions on convention vs convention...just said what republicans would say about the Dem convention, because that part was definitely "cluster" worthy.

    Not a very good response by you.

    WildcatGG24

  • CarlLexington said...

    I think it's fair to say most moderate and independent people would say the democratic convention blew the republican one away. Only the most conservative of republicans would say their convention was better and I'd bet a lot that a good % of those know the democratic convention was better but would never admit it.

    How can you have much of an honest opinion though...this was the start of your RNC thread:

    "I didn't watch it. Of course. I caught snippets here and there."

    Not saying you are wrong or right...just wondering how you can compare when you didnt watch one. If you are going off of polling bumps, well I wouldnt put much stock into it. Dems were going to get a bump no matter the convention performance...hell I think GWB got a large bump...back in 04

    WildcatGG24

  • WildcatGG24 said...

    How can you have much of an honest opinion though...this was the start of your RNC thread:

    "I didn't watch it. Of course. I caught snippets here and there."

    Not saying you are wrong or right...just wondering how you can compare when you didnt watch one. If you are going off of polling bumps, well I wouldnt put much stock into it. Dems were going to get a bump no matter the convention performance...hell I think GWB got a large bump...back in 04

    I'm going on what I did see which was a complete joke of a convention coming from the republicans. Chris Christie acting like he's the one being nominated, not a mention of Afghanistan, Ann Romney trying to convince people she and Mitt had it really rough, the entire platform being based on a lie, and the now infamous Eastwood and the empty chair routine. By all accounts other than Fox a complete laughfest of a convention.

    signature image

    CarlLexington

  • Man Colbert had an hilarious bit. It started with that Frankenstein's Monster-Like Brit Hume saying something like this about the Democratic Convention "The press box was open to the floor of the convention and the cheering was so loud we couldn't hear ourselves. Another example that the democrats didn't really have their stuff together". Flash to Colbert: "Yes!! The unbridled enthusiasm of the democrats was so loud Fox reporters couldn't hear themselves reporting on how much it sucked". Colbert is a republican

    signature image

    CarlLexington

  • CarlLexington said...

    I'm going on what I did see which was a complete joke of a convention coming from the republicans. Chris Christie acting like he's the one being nominated, not a mention of Afghanistan, Ann Romney trying to convince people she and Mitt had it really rough, the entire platform being based on a lie, and the now infamous Eastwood and the empty chair routine. By all accounts other than Fox a complete laughfest of a convention.

    Those other accounts happen to be left leaning? Sure, they are...Fox right leaning? Sure it is.

    They see what they want to see and send the message of what they want people to believe whether it be true or false.

    Christie was bad. Anne Romney was genuine. Michelle Obama seemed phony on her delivery to me, but I know some people loved it. Clinton did what he does, and is very popular, ran a little too long but performed good. Obama was underwhelming. Romney did better than his usual speeches, but still underwhelming. Biden was surprisingly better than Obama, his only prob was that a few times he got angry looking. Ryan wasnt memorable, but I bet his "all-american" family helps him (Obama's does as well). Sandra Fluke was a joke...

    All in all, they were all FOS and these convention won't have much impact in November. They were pretty forgettable.

    WildcatGG24

  • Really cannot argue with your assessment too much, but I disagree about Ryan's speech. I did not watch the DNC at all, so I can't really comment.

    suncat05

  • WildcatGG24 said...

    Those other accounts happen to be left leaning? Sure, they are...Fox right leaning? Sure it is.

    They see what they want to see and send the message of what they want people to believe whether it be true or false.

    Christie was bad. Anne Romney was genuine. Michelle Obama seemed phony on her delivery to me, but I know some people loved it. Clinton did what he does, and is very popular, ran a little too long but performed good. Obama was underwhelming. Romney did better than his usual speeches, but still underwhelming. Biden was surprisingly better than Obama, his only prob was that a few times he got angry looking. Ryan wasnt memorable, but I bet his "all-american" family helps him (Obama's does as well). Sandra Fluke was a joke...

    All in all, they were all FOS and these convention won't have much impact in November. They were pretty forgettable.

    Not a bad assessment, but how could you leave out the one who outshined them all... Marco Rubio? He was better than anyone...from either side.

    signature image signature image

    JawJacker

  • JawJacker said...

    Not a bad assessment, but how could you leave out the one who outshined them all... Marco Rubio? He was better than anyone...from either side.

    Rubio was very good. He did flub up at the very end, but he has that Obama effect to where people just love the way he speaks and sounds so I am not sure too many caught it.

    He will be a star.

    WildcatGG24

  • headslap Jaysus.

    In the final sentence of his speech, Rubio told voters that he dreamed about the day when there will be more "government over more freedom," with Mitt Romney in office. He clearly meant the opposite, that Republicans want more freedom over more government.

    What he really meant is more freedom for the rich and more poverty for the poor. Adore him if you want but he was far from the best speaker of either convention. He wasn't even the best of his disastrous party's convention. Here's a lil diddy on the golden child and it's from Fox "News" which is pretty shocking in and of itself.

    And on a completely different note this election is far from over. I know I have talked a lot of smack. I can't resist sticking it to the righties. They deserve it so. But I'm not ready to throw dirt on Romney yet. There's a long way to go and I can't help but seeing Truman holding the "Dewey Wins" headline in my mind's eye. A long way to go.

    Marco Rubio's Past Political Vulnerabilities? | Fox News Latino

    The rising GOP star has potential vulnerabilities in his personal and political background.

    latino.foxnews.com
    signature image

    CarlLexington

  • WildcatGG24 said...

    So no doubt Democrats have a lot more "hollywood" in their productions and I assume it plays very well to the average Joe that isnt much into politics but will vote.

    During the RNC, did you happen to see that big tall old dude who was standing next to the chair?

    djkycat54906

  • dj-ky-cat said...

    During the RNC, did you happen to see that big tall old dude who was standing next to the chair?

    lmao +1

    signature image

    CarlLexington

  • dj-ky-cat said...

    During the RNC, did you happen to see that big tall old dude who was standing next to the chair?

    I wasnt talking about celebrities...I was talking about production.

    Like the columns in 08...

    Like I said more "hollywood" in their PRODUCTIONS....didnt say more "hollywood" in their speakers and audience, although that would be true as well.

    WildcatGG24

  • WildcatGG24 said...

    I wasnt talking about celebrities...I was talking about production.

    Like the columns in 08...

    Like I said more "hollywood" in their PRODUCTIONS....didnt say more "hollywood" in their speakers and audience, although that would be true as well.

    I'll stand by my opinion that Republicans are the worst star-touchers, but I won't argue over who has the better production values. It's 95% people standing up there and talking--there's only so much you can do.

    Traditionally, Republicans have been much stronger in unifying their message. They failed at that this year for the first time that I remember. You've got to blame that on the campaign which is lackluster if not inept. It was their responsibility to make Christie address the message. It was their foul-up to let their bland candidate follow one of the world's biggest stars (Clint). You can blame Hollywood all you want, but this was just bad political fundamentals.

    djkycat54906

  • Not blaming Hollywood or anyone. In fact, I think it is beneficial for the Dems to produce such grand things.

    I think it plays very well to the un-informed and the people who care about politics for about a week out of the year. It's smart.

    WildcatGG24

  • CarlLexington said...

    And on a completely different note this election is far from over. I know I have talked a lot of smack. I can't resist sticking it to the righties. They deserve it so. But I'm not ready to throw dirt on Romney yet. There's a long way to go and I can't help but seeing Truman holding the "Dewey Wins" headline in my mind's eye. A long way to go.

    There's a ways to go, but this is shaping up to be a disaster for Republicans, which might not be a bad thing (for them) in the long run. I think it's a revelation that they can nominate a candidate that so little understands how America works and apparently has no respect for anybody south of median income, from which he will likely receive a majority of his votes.

    I do not believe this speaks for the majority of Republicans. By and large, they respect the American ideals of advancement. They also, in large numbers, believe that government has some role in fostering that advancement. The question since the New Deal is how much of a role that needs to be. They do not hold grudges against people who need or needed some of that help because most of us either are those people, have had some of those people in our families, or may be even working for such a person.

    EJ Dionne had this quote in his column today--it's very nicely stated from Pres. George W. Bush. Although I disagreed with Pres. Bush on many many things, this kind of thing isn't something I ever dreamed any Americans would disagree over:

    "Yet this is not who we are as Americans. We have always found our better selves in sympathy and generosity, both in our lives and in our laws. ... Our national character shines in our compassion."

    djkycat54906

  • WildcatGG24 said...

    Not blaming Hollywood or anyone. In fact, I think it is beneficial for the Dems to produce such grand things.

    I think it plays very well to the un-informed and the people who care about politics for about a week out of the year. It's smart.

    It's funny you keep insulting Dems by calling us uniformed when the Right get all their information from Fox "news", rush, beck, and right wing bloggers that cater to them. Republicans think they can cut their way to a balanced budget(uninformed/stupid). Republicans think the world is 6000 years old(uniformed/stupid). Republicans think man has nothing to do with climate change(uninformed/stupid). Republicans think Obama was born in Kenya(uninformed/stupid). Providing a link showing the correlation between college graduates and party affiliation. In short, the more educated a person becomes the more left they become. Hence republicans wanting to gut education/grants so they can keep the people good and stupid sheep ripe for the propaganda of the conservative machine. Production value had nothing to do with people knowing the dems won the convention comparison. It had to do with the platforms and what each side was selling. I don't recall Clinton coming out with fire cannons and a pink floyedesque light show. He just spoke. I don't recall Michelle Obama coming from the rafters on a harnees to land on a stage where cirque du soleil was performing. She just spoke. And so on with all the speakers. The left are winning on our ideas, not production or a "liberal" media. As a matter of fact the so-called liberal media have been frustratingly easy on Mitt and Paul. They never question them on their fuzzy math or Mitt's tax evasion. They may ask but they don't follow up and demand a real answer. They never ever call Mitt out for his daily flip flops.

    This post was edited by CarlLexington on 9/20/2012 at 10:22 AM

    Proof: Republicans Really Are Dumber Than Democrats - Business Insider

    No wonder Rick Santorum said he didn't want everyone to go to college.  More college means fewer Republicans.  Justin Wolfers tweeted this little chart showing the correlation between having a

    articles.businessinsider.com
    signature image

    CarlLexington

  • CarlLexington said...

    I don't recall Clinton coming out with fire cannons and a pink floyedesque light show.

    I thought the Republicans were bringing out that big pig that Pink Floyd used to have, but it turned out it was just the governor of New Jersey.

    djkycat54906

  • dj-ky-cat said...

    There's a ways to go, but this is shaping up to be a disaster for Republicans, which might not be a bad thing (for them) in the long run. I think it's a revelation that they can nominate a candidate that so little understands how America works and apparently has no respect for anybody south of median income, from which he will likely receive a majority of his votes.

    I do not believe this speaks for the majority of Republicans. By and large, they respect the American ideals of advancement. They also, in large numbers, believe that government has some role in fostering that advancement. The question since the New Deal is how much of a role that needs to be. They do not hold grudges against people who need or needed some of that help because most of us either are those people, have had some of those people in our families, or may be even working for such a person.

    EJ Dionne had this quote in his column today--it's very nicely stated from Pres. George W. Bush. Although I disagreed with Pres. Bush on many many things, this kind of thing isn't something I ever dreamed any Americans would disagree over:

    "Yet this is not who we are as Americans. We have always found our better selves in sympathy and generosity, both in our lives and in our laws. ... Our national character shines in our compassion."

    I don't think they'll get the message they should. They'll see it that they need a "real" conservative running. Someone even more right than Romney. Which is the exact opposite of what they should be learning. I completely disagree that Republicans by and large respect Government having a role in the adavancment of the poor or sick or less fortunate. I think by and large they could give a shit about anyone other than themselves. If you aren't making it it's because you're lazy. You have no right to food or my tax money just because you're too lazy to work. That's by and large the republican attitude. And they believe everyone needing and receiving help is a lazy bum. They are either cruel or uninformed morons. By and large. Not all. They hammered Dubya for those statements and the few good things he did do, aid to africa and prescription drugs for seniors.

    signature image

    CarlLexington

  • dj-ky-cat said...

    I thought the Republicans were bringing out that big pig that Pink Floyd used to have, but it turned out it was just the governor of New Jersey.

    rotfl!!! Nice!! Another +1

    signature image

    CarlLexington

  • CarlLexington said...

    I don't think they'll get the message they should. They'll see it that they need a "real" conservative running. Someone even more right than Romney. Which is the exact opposite of what they should be learning. I completely disagree that Republicans by and large respect Government having a role in the adavancment of the poor or sick or less fortunate. I think by and large they could give a shit about anyone other than themselves. If you aren't making it it's because you're lazy. You have no right to food or my tax money just because you're too lazy to work. That's by and large the republican attitude. And they believe everyone needing and receiving help is a lazy bum. They are either cruel or uninformed morons. By and large. Not all. They hammered Dubya for those statements and the few good things he did do, aid to africa and prescription drugs for seniors.

    I just don't know. I'm probably just naive. I've never actually been around any class-ism. I've seen plenty of racism, probably some sexism, but really the hard core Republicans I've always known are not like this guy. It's extremely un-Christian, and from what I know about Mormonism, it's un-Mormon too.

    Whether the next candidate will be any better is anybody's guess. I agree that the extreme right will push for a more conservative candidate--which they would of course do. I'd advise them to re-watch Bill Clinton's speech and learn about A-rith-ma-tic. They just can't get the votes with that kind of stuff. I'd say the moderate part will feel frustrated in that they've had two seeming moderates in the last two elections that turned really hard right when the spotlight came on.

    djkycat54906

  • CarlLexington said...

    It's funny you keep insulting Dems by calling us uniformed when the Right get all their information from Fox "news", rush, beck, and right wing bloggers that cater to them. Republicans think they can cut their way to a balanced budget(uninformed/stupid). Republicans think the world is 6000 years old(uniformed/stupid). Republicans think man has nothing to do with climate change(uninformed/stupid). Republicans think Obama was born in Kenya(uninformed/stupid). Providing a link showing the correlation between college graduates and party affiliation. In short, the more educated a person becomes the more left they become. Hence republicans wanting to gut education/grants so they can keep the people good and stupid sheep ripe for the propaganda of the conservative machine. Production value had nothing to do with people knowing the dems won the convention comparison. It had to do with the platforms and what each side was selling. I don't recall Clinton coming out with fire cannons and a pink floyedesque light show. He just spoke. I don't recall Michelle Obama coming from the rafters on a harnees to land on a stage where cirque du soleil was performing. She just spoke. And so on with all the speakers. The left are winning on our ideas, not production or a "liberal" media. As a matter of fact the so-called liberal media have been frustratingly easy on Mitt and Paul. They never question them on their fuzzy math or Mitt's tax evasion. They may ask but they don't follow up and demand a real answer. They never ever call Mitt out for his daily flip flops.

    Quit assuming so much...I said the uninformed who pay attention for about a week of the year.

    I am talking about people who do not know what they are actually voting for...I am not talking about democrats or liberals.

    I wouldnt call you or DJ uninformed at all...I dont have to agree with you all, but you keep up with news and politics daily.

    WildcatGG24

  • CarlLexington said...

    headslap Jaysus.

    In the final sentence of his speech, Rubio told voters that he dreamed about the day when there will be more "government over more freedom," with Mitt Romney in office. He clearly meant the opposite, that Republicans want more freedom over more government.

    What he really meant is more freedom for the rich and more poverty for the poor. Adore him if you want but he was far from the best speaker of either convention. He wasn't even the best of his disastrous party's convention. Here's a lil diddy on the golden child and it's from Fox "News" which is pretty shocking in and of itself.

    And on a completely different note this election is far from over. I know I have talked a lot of smack. I can't resist sticking it to the righties. They deserve it so. But I'm not ready to throw dirt on Romney yet. There's a long way to go and I can't help but seeing Truman holding the "Dewey Wins" headline in my mind's eye. A long way to go.

    Yeah... I caught that flub up, but I knew he meant the opposite. Besides that though, he was great.

    signature image signature image

    JawJacker

  • It ain't over yet but Romney needs to kick it into another gear if he hopes to have a chance. I'm just amazed at the kid glove treatment der leader has gotten over the last two weeks. Amassador gets killed, make a statement and fly off to Vegas for a fundraiser. Lie about the circumstances for a week and then when the truth gets out, it all gets ignored. For crying out loud, when asked about the total debt he couldn't even answer that (hint idiot it's 16Trillion and climbing). Bottom line is I've never seen a guy get such a pass for his obvious BS and incompetence as this POS. Even Bob Woodward, who in tremendous detail documents the DBag's utter incompetence and failed leadership, and NOBODY gives it creedence. If I didn't know better I'd bet that Obama's real name is Damian Thorne the way people just circle the wagons and protect him!!!

    ukaveman

  • ukaveman said...

    It ain't over yet but Romney needs to kick it into another gear if he hopes to have a chance. I'm just amazed at the kid glove treatment der leader has gotten over the last two weeks. Amassador gets killed, make a statement and fly off to Vegas for a fundraiser. Lie about the circumstances for a week and then when the truth gets out, it all gets ignored. For crying out loud, when asked about the total debt he couldn't even answer that (hint idiot it's 16Trillion and climbing). Bottom line is I've never seen a guy get such a pass for his obvious BS and incompetence as this POS. Even Bob Woodward, who in tremendous detail documents the DBag's utter incompetence and failed leadership, and NOBODY gives it creedence. If I didn't know better I'd bet that Obama's real name is Damian Thorne the way people just circle the wagons and protect him!!!

    Explain how the Ambassador getting killed is Obama's fault. They weren't lying about the circumstances. They were gathering information and getting the facts straight before they stupidly realeased an untrue and immature statement, like Romney did. If it gets ignored how do you know about it? People know. There is just nothing to make out of it as the President is concerned. At least he can answer questions about his own taxes, and he knows exactly what the debt is. Don't be stupid. Incompetence just isn't true. That's just a biased slander by right wing idiots. If you're looking for incompetence look at the mouth breather you guys last had in office or look at Romney the past 2 weeks. Those are examples of incompetence. Obama is a guy doing things you don't like. There's a difference. Have you read the Woodward book or just regurgitating what Rush told you to think? There's no need for wagon circling or protection. The sad thing is you actually see this stuff as truth.

    signature image

    CarlLexington

  • Barring Devine intervention it is over. I tell ya, some people have way too much faith in the American people.

    I completely agree about him getting a pass from everybody. Especially when you consider the hammering Ryan is taking about the marathon time. Really? It's upside down.

    stillDA23