The Paddock

You stated: "They didn't wait years. They brought it to peoples attention years ago. And got paid off for their silence."

My reply: Hearsay... where's the proof?

You stated: "As for this new woman it isn't that kind of situation. It's a woman that carried on a 13 year relationship with him."

My reply: You said yourself in another post that this woman "maintains" they had a 13 year relationship. How does that equate to "REALLY HAD" a 13 year relationship? Again, just hearsay... where's the proof?

You stated: " It isn't the left that Cain himself is accusing for bringing all this back up. He's blaming his republican opponents. Mainly Romney and Perry."

My reply: He NEVER specifically named anyone... he gave "general" answers as to who may be behind this. YOU said Cain named Romney and Perry... where's the proof?

You stated: "And for the record I don't give a crap if he wins the nomination or not."

My reply: For someone who doesn't care or plans on staying home and not voting... you sure seem to be awful worried and concerned about who the possible GOP nominee will be... and thus, make an obvious effort to point out all the "negatives" of Obama's competition. Odd.

JawSmacker I don't care. I really don't. The republican field are in the news. That's why they're being commented on. And I said they all suck and I could smash them all up if I wanted. I said why I didn't like Newt. Cain kept getting love and I happened upon yet another woman accuser. The point of it was to show he's done as a candidate. Did you not read my post? I said right in there that this shouldn't cost him a chance. I'm betting if it was a democrat that had all these women coming forward you would have an entirely different outlook. Whereas I would have the exact same outlook either way. I bet during the Clinton scandal, before there was the stained dress and everything was just rumor, you believed everything they said about him. That's if you were even alive then. I hope Cain stays in as long as he can. It's more entertaining with him in the race. Do you even believe the crap you type?

It isn't rhetoric. It's news. I explained why it's not a democrat. It would be incredibly stupid for a dem to bring this up at this time. The timing doesn't gel with a dem doing it. Even Cain knows that and has said as much. Are you so blinded by partisan politics you can't grasp the simple concept that a republican can leak a story on another republican to gain an advantage in a primary? It happens every election. Dems leaking on dems. Repubs leaking on repubs. It's par for the course. Cain gets up in the polls with Romney and this stuff comes up and you blame Obama? What kind of sense does that make? Cain making a race of it plays well for Obama. Why would he want to derail it? That makes no sense. And your entire thinking is wrong. There isn't some conspiracy laden mad man mastermind behind the scenes coaching these women and throwing them to the press. The story got leaked and these women came forward. As for proof the woman has cell phone records. 4AM phone calls. Yeah. He says she's just a friend he was helping financially. Right.

I said the exact same thing. I even gave more examples of womanizers that were good leaders. Do you smoke meth?

I wish. I'd make a fortune on you crazy fockers.

I don't know if I believe all of them either. I figure if there's so many odds are at least 1 or a few of them are telling the truth. It's just the odds. And you hit on my entire point. True or not, and I believe a lot of it is true, it has ended his run. His numbers are plummeting. I think the difference between Clinton and Edwards is a matter of degree. Clinton dribbled some on a dress. Edwards actually got a woman pregnant and that all hit when his wife got diagnosed with cancer. Just the perfect crap storm for Edwards. And there's no way he ever runs for office again. But yeah, you nailed everything perfectly.

Newt is on a roll... he's leading in ALL polls now. Mitt has reason to worry... as does Obama.

Here's an article on the subject. My favorite part:

Indeed, faced with him as the nominee, many conservatives would privately hold their noses and vote for Obama. “Bigfoot dressed as a circus clown would have a better chance of beating President Obama than Newt Gingrich, a similarly farcical character,” one anonymous Republican told Washington Post blogger Jonathan Bernstein.

Any hatred for Newt (or any REP candidate) will not make a Republican hold their nose and vote for Obama. That is fiction.

Obama will get shredded in '12 by ANY candidate barring a full blown implosion. A pizza maker would've trounced Obama if the election were held in August.

You're a joke... see me laughing

As one of your friends said, you're a fool.

I agree with your first statement, but Gingrich is enough to keep the GOP moderate-sometime-voters home.

How do you justify your statement about Obama getting shredded? Please support it with some factual data if it's not just complete speculation on your part. I disagree with you. Here's a story about polls done in South Carolina and Florida, 2 states critical for the GOP if they're to win in 2012. Obama probably would have lost if the election were this past August, I agree with you on that.

"Obama, who lost South Carolina to Sen. John McCain in 2008, leads Romney there, 45% to 42%, a disparity within the margin of error. Obama also leads Gingrich 46% to 42%. The result is a reversal for Romney, who bested the president by six percentage points in the October poll.

In Florida, a state Obama captured in the last election, he would beat Romney 48% to 41% and Gingrich 51% to 39% in a potential match-up. In October, voters were divided between Romney and Obama."

Right now, the Republicans are attacking each other. wait till there's a consensus candidate and they start going after the low hanging fruit of Obama's economic record which is atrocious.