-
catcard202 said...
No...No I wasn't a libertarian..I'm still a registered REP, as I have always been. And just as I have previously stated...the REP party I belonged to, has been over run by people so far to the Religious Right & By Tea Party REP... That my views are now seen as being squarely on the Liberal side of those rigid ideologues.
It's just fun messing w/ those ill-prepared & uniformed lost souls.
-
stillDA23 said...
So JJ, would you be in favor of an overturn of Roe v. Wade? As far as gay marriage goes, I'm sure you're probably in the same camp as I am in that if a state wants to pass a defense of marriage act, they should be able to do so, and if a state wants to honor gay marriage, let them. But then it gets dicey as to the states with DOMA, have to recognize the gay marriage. If they could get that figured out, that would be good.
People like to frame abortion as an act that a woman does to her own body. That's complete fukin bullshit if you ask me. Any doctor will tell you that a fetus is a complete different body. It's not a tumor. We legislate morality all the time. You know, how murder and stealing is wrong? Anyway, I know I'm not going to change anyone's mind on the internet, so I'll leave the issue alone, I guess. Just know that it means a million times more to me than if I have money in my pocket or not.
This post has been edited 2 times, most recently by JawJacker on 10/29/2012 at 1:42 PM
-
CarlLexington
- 3 stars Rating: 50
397 votes total - (3428)
- 25 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 3 stars
-
CarlLexington said...
I'm also against late term abortions unless the health of the mother is threatened. The mother's life takes precedence 100% of the time. By late term I mean the 3rd trimester. You figure anyone that's pregnant will know in the first 3 months. That gives her 3 months minimum to make her choice. If she can't make her choice in 3 months too bad, she's stuck with it.
Oh and for the record I'm against abortion personally. But I'm not a woman and that's her choice. Not mine.
-
stillDA23 said...
This is what you said:
"DA, I was raised in a very REP - god fearing household...(The grandson of a minister & son of a black-sheep.) But it's true that my views have ebbed & flowed for yrs. I'm now at a point in my life that I feel like I'm really stuck btwn the 2 extremes / 2 parties. I'm either a Liberal-REP or Conservative-Dem. Not sure which is which...(Socially Liberal - Fiscally Conservative. - for the most part) "
That last part about socail liberal, fiscal conservative... That's libertarian. Maybe you just didn't know you were a libertarian, but now apparently you love social programs and spending the country into oblivion.
This post was edited by catcard202 on 10/30/2012 at 7:27 AM
-
catcard202 said...
Or they pull their head out of their asses & realized that everything that's good for billionaires, isn't necessarily good for the common working man. And that Wall Street capitalism in it's most vulturous form, isn't good for main street America.
It's kinda hard to argue that it is, when it's led to over 46Million people in this country living below the poverty line! The largest # of Americans in the 52yrs the census bureau had been publishing it's results. (per the 2010 US Census Bureau that poverty line for a family of 4 was ONLY a little over $22K in household income! Which is SQUAT.).
The # of Americans living below the poverty line is roughly equal to the entire population of the 22 least populated states combined!!!
The population of Wyoming, Vermont, North & South Dakota, Alaska, Delaware, Montana, Rhode Island, New Hampshire, Maine, Hawaii, Idaho, Nebraska, West Virgina, New Mexico, Nevada, Utah, Kansas, Arkansas, Mississippi, Iowa, Connecticut = 45,052,212 people.
This post was edited by tWhit on 10/30/2012 at 12:23 PM
-
catcard202 said...
You mean get help from the social services that this REP party wants to cut the guts out of???
You guys can not have it both ways...Can't just say they can get help & at the same time, plan to cut the funding for said help. (Ryan Budget)
And as far as upward mobility in America is concerned...It's been slipping for decades...We have fallen well behind other industrialized nations.
(What Ever Happened To Upward Mobility?)
-
catcard202 said...
Or they pull their head out of their asses & realized that everything that's good for billionaires, isn't necessarily good for the common working man. And that Wall Street capitalism in it's most vulturous form, isn't good for main street America.
It's kinda hard to argue that it is, when it's led to over 46Million people in this country living below the poverty line! The largest # of Americans in the 52yrs the census bureau had been publishing it's results. (per the 2010 US Census Bureau that poverty line for a family of 4 was ONLY a little over $22K in household income! Which is SQUAT.).
The # of Americans living below the poverty line is roughly equal to the entire population of the 22 least populated states combined!!!
The population of Wyoming, Vermont, North & South Dakota, Alaska, Delaware, Montana, Rhode Island, New Hampshire, Maine, Hawaii, Idaho, Nebraska, West Virgina, New Mexico, Nevada, Utah, Kansas, Arkansas, Mississippi, Iowa, Connecticut = 45,052,212 people.
-
CarlLexington
- 3 stars Rating: 50
397 votes total - (3428)
- 25 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 3 stars
- Post a New Topic
- Back to Topics
- « Previous Topic
- Next Topic »
- Boards ▾
- Pages: 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6





Quick Political Question??